For the record.

POSTED BY: FREMDFIRMA
UPDATED: Sunday, April 26, 2026 20:08
VIEWED: 23432
PAGE 11 of 23

Funny how some think their not understanding the complexities of the issues they debate, is somehow someone else's fault.

I would say to them do the research. Stop depending on others to explain everything to you like they would a child.

An example would be what I just had to explain. Why I used nationalism and populism in the same sentence. I had to do this because one person wasn't smart enough to realize, both words applied to the point I was making. So, I explained by posting definitions of both words and then breaking the definitions down even further. I did this by explaining how both words fit into todays political atmosphere. Which was a part of the larger point I was making.

Now, stupid number two suggested in this thread, I should do this all the time. Why, I guess so stupid people wouldn't get confused. And, he did it in a way that suggested, their not understanding the complexities of what they are debating was somehow my fault. Not because he was stupid.

Folks, you can't make this shit up.


Here is that exchange

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

THUGR: If you wanted to say "populism", you shoulda said "populism".



ME

Nationalism is patriotism; the idea of supporting one's country and culture.

Key word being culture sig. Protecting ones culture from changing or morphing into something else. All the racists and bigoted statements by Trump are exploiting these emotions across the country and even the world.



Populism is (philosophy) a (political) doctrine or philosophy that proposes that the rights and powers of ordinary people are exploited by a privileged elite, and supports their struggle to overcome this.

This is the form of doctrine Trump ran on and represents the Bannon (far right) wing of the party. The message is simple and excludes any of the intricacies (the character of something that has many aspects or parts arranged together in a particularly complex or artful way), of an issue or policy. It's fodder for the stupid and uneducated.

Both sig, both play a large part in filling the warped and uneducated minds with dribble. It's spread by fake news, propaganda outlets and trolls like you.


T

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Funny how some think their not understanding the complexities of the issues they debate, is somehow someone else's fault.

I would say to them do the research. Stop depending on others to explain everything to you like they would a child.

An example would be what I just had to explain. Why I used nationalism and populism in the same sentence. I had to do this because one person wasn't smart enough to realize, both words applied to the point I was making. So, I explained by posting definitions of both words and then breaking the definitions down even further. I did this by explaining how both words fit into todays political atmosphere. Which was a part of the larger point I was making.

Now, stupid number two suggested in this thread, I should do this all the time. Why, I guess so stupid people wouldn't get confused. And, he did it in a way that suggested, their not understanding the complexities of what they are debating was somehow my fault. Not because he was stupid.

Folks, you can't make this shit up.


Here is that exchange

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

THUGR: If you wanted to say "populism", you shoulda said "populism".



ME

Nationalism is patriotism; the idea of supporting one's country and culture.

Key word being culture sig. Protecting ones culture from changing or morphing into something else. All the racists and bigoted statements by Trump are exploiting these emotions across the country and even the world.



Populism is (philosophy) a (political) doctrine or philosophy that proposes that the rights and powers of ordinary people are exploited by a privileged elite, and supports their struggle to overcome this.

This is the form of doctrine Trump ran on and represents the Bannon (far right) wing of the party. The message is simple and excludes any of the intricacies (the character of something that has many aspects or parts arranged together in a particularly complex or artful way), of an issue or policy. It's fodder for the stupid and uneducated.

Both sig, both play a large part in filling the warped and uneducated minds with dribble. It's spread by fake news, propaganda outlets and trolls like you.


T

---

I wasn't talking about your infantile opinions on nationalism or populism.

I was talking about how what you wrote sounded like you wanted to be proven wrong and see somebody die out of all of this. That is very much what it sounded like you were saying.

Until you agree that nobody should ever be threatened for simply expressing their opinions, no matter what those opinions are, then I have no desire to know what any of your opinions on any other topic are. They are all null and void.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Figures - yet another threat from SIGNYM. You have threatened me 3 times- GSTRING

---

Oh no, GSTRING, didn't you read my post? I SAID I hoped I was wrong! Just like THUGR did! How could that possibly be a threat? It's just well-wishes, dood. Stop shitting your pants!

---

My pants are lemony fresh, a-hole. You keep whining about being threatened and then threaten people. That's just Dumb Fuckery at it's purest level.



==============================

---

What she said wasn't a threat. I don't care if you're ignoring me. It doesn't change the fact that it wasn't a threat.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

GSTRING, what THUGR wrote

Quote:

---

If I'm right, all the cry babies here will still be posting a few months from now. If I'm wrong and they're dead, I'll be sure to say I was wrong in a post. Really, I look forward to it.

---

What I posted

Quote:

---

Yanno GSTRING, if anything happens to Trump supporters, and it becomes known that you aided, abetted, or encouraged the violence, I really hope that you don't face any legal consequences... yanno, the kind where the webmaster HAS to turn over his records, and the law comes to get YOU. Really, I hope I'm wrong and I'll be glad to say so.

---

What's the diff??? None, as far as I can tell. I did my best to mimic THUGR's post. So what makes my post a "threat", and THUGR's not? That's right: It isn't. In bad taste? Not to be posted? You betcha! But not a threat.

Jeez, stop going off half-cocked. So, FOR THE RECORD: My post was simply taking THUGR's wording and turning it around on you, for illustrative purposes only.

And it illustrated exactly what I thought it would: You have not an objective neuron in what passes for a brain. When "your side" does it, it's copacetic. When the "other side" does it, it's heinous. Gawd, you're stupid. Spineless too, crying "wolf" all the time.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Funny how some think their not understanding the complexities of the issues they debate, is somehow someone else's fault.

I would say to them do the research. Stop depending on others to explain everything to you like they would a child.

An example would be what I just had to explain. Why I used nationalism and populism in the same sentence. I had to do this because one person wasn't smart enough to realize, both words applied to the point I was making. So, I explained by posting definitions of both words and then breaking the definitions down even further. I did this by explaining how both words fit into todays political atmosphere. Which was a part of the larger point I was making.

Now, stupid number two suggested in this thread, I should do this all the time. Why, I guess so stupid people wouldn't get confused. And, he did it in a way that suggested, their not understanding the complexities of what they are debating was somehow my fault. Not because he was stupid.

Folks, you can't make this shit up.


Here is that exchange

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

THUGR: If you wanted to say "populism", you shoulda said "populism".



ME

Nationalism is patriotism; the idea of supporting one's country and culture.

Key word being culture sig. Protecting ones culture from changing or morphing into something else. All the racists and bigoted statements by Trump are exploiting these emotions across the country and even the world.



Populism is (philosophy) a (political) doctrine or philosophy that proposes that the rights and powers of ordinary people are exploited by a privileged elite, and supports their struggle to overcome this.

This is the form of doctrine Trump ran on and represents the Bannon (far right) wing of the party. The message is simple and excludes any of the intricacies (the character of something that has many aspects or parts arranged together in a particularly complex or artful way), of an issue or policy. It's fodder for the stupid and uneducated.

Both sig, both play a large part in filling the warped and uneducated minds with dribble. It's spread by fake news, propaganda outlets and trolls like you.


T

---

I wasn't talking about your infantile opinions on nationalism or populism.

I was talking about how what you wrote sounded like you wanted to be proven wrong and see somebody die out of all of this. That is very much what it sounded like you were saying.

Until you agree that nobody should ever be threatened for simply expressing their opinions, no matter what those opinions are, then I have no desire to know what any of your opinions on any other topic are. They are all null and void.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Funny how some think their not understanding the complexities of the issues they debate, is somehow someone else's fault.

I would say to them do the research. Stop depending on others to explain everything to you like they would a child.

An example would be what I just had to explain. Why I used nationalism and populism in the same sentence. I had to do this because one person wasn't smart enough to realize, both words applied to the point I was making. So, I explained by posting definitions of both words and then breaking the definitions down even further. I did this by explaining how both words fit into todays political atmosphere. Which was a part of the larger point I was making.

Now, stupid number two suggested in this thread, I should do this all the time. Why, I guess so stupid people wouldn't get confused. And, he did it in a way that suggested, their not understanding the complexities of what they are deb

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME