The Evidens
POSTED BY: JO753
UPDATED: Monday, February 14, 2022 07:11
VIEWED: 159178
PAGE 30 of 121
Quote:Ah, the old ad hominem ... a SECOND-RATE special.
Originally posted by second:
Weren't you a Bernie person? When did you join the legal team defending the GOP?
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
I'm sure you don't. In fact, I guarantee you'll do one of four things 1) shift the topic, 2) disappear for a while and then shift the topic, 3) continue with an ad hominem, or 4) some combination of those.
Putting you back on 'ignore', again.
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:It has everything to do with your honesty, integrity and sincerity, HIS for short. You're the one that always wants people's opinion. If you're fake, if you don't have HIS, your opinions are worthless. Signym was pro-Trump, anti-establishment, anti-Hillary. 1kiki was pro-Bernie, anti-establishment, anti-Hillary. Now you are both on Trump's side. It is not a bad place to be, but Bernie is not supporting Trump in any way. Why is 1kiki, the once-upon-a-time Bernie supporter?
Originally posted by 1kiki:Quote:Ah, the old ad hominem ... a SECOND-RATE special.
Originally posted by second:
Weren't you a Bernie person? When did you join the legal team defending the GOP?
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
I'm sure you don't. in fact, I guarantee you'll do one of three things 1) shift the topic, 2) disappear for a while and then shift the topic, or 3) continue with an ad hominem; or some combination.
Putting you back on 'ignore', again.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Ah, the old ad hominem ... a SECOND-RATE special.
Originally posted by second:
Weren't you a Bernie person? When did you join the legal team defending the GOP?
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
I'm sure you don't. In fact, I guarantee you'll do one of four things 1) shift the topic, 2) disappear for a while and then shift the topic, 3) continue with an ad hominem, or 4) some combination of those.
Putting you back on 'ignore', again.
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Do you realize you just reposted what you had previously posted? You're dissembling. Explain why you, a former Bernie supporter, is on the GOP's legal team. Weissmann's overturned convictions is only of interest to Trump's legal team while concocting a plan to fire Mueller. It is as if 1kiki and Signym are now the same person, both supporting Trump.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Ah, the old ad hominem ... a SECOND-RATE special.
Originally posted by second:
Weren't you a Bernie person? When did you join the legal team defending the GOP?
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
I'm sure you don't. In fact, I guarantee you'll do one of four things 1) shift the topic, 2) disappear for a while and then shift the topic, 3) continue with an ad hominem, or 4) some combination of those.
Putting you back on 'ignore', again.
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You posted the same reply three times in a row. That is a fact. Within your posts you promised: "Putting you back on 'ignore', again", but then you did not ignore me. That is evidence you are not sincere about what you post. And you have not yet answered why you went from supporting Bernie to joining Trump's legal team. Bernie didn't join the team. Why you?
Originally posted by 1kiki:Quote:Ah, the old ad hominem ... a SECOND-RATE special.
Originally posted by second:
Weren't you a Bernie person? When did you join the legal team defending the GOP?
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
I'm sure you don't. In fact, I guarantee you'll do one of four things 1) shift the topic, 2) disappear for a while and then shift the topic, 3) continue with an ad hominem, or 4) some combination of those.
Putting you back on 'ignore', again.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Ah, the old ad hominem ... a SECOND-RATE special.
Originally posted by second:
Weren't you a Bernie person? When did you join the legal team defending the GOP?
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
I'm sure you don't. In fact, I guarantee you'll do one of four things 1) shift the topic, 2) disappear for a while and then shift the topic, 3) continue with an ad hominem, or 4) some combination of those.
Putting you back on 'ignore', again.
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:That is four times in a row 1kiki posted the same comment. And each post promised 1kiki would put me back on 'ignore'. Ignore must have a new definition. Ooh, so cool to learn.
Originally posted by 1kiki:Quote:Ah, the old ad hominem ... a SECOND-RATE special.
Originally posted by second:
Weren't you a Bernie person? When did you join the legal team defending the GOP?
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
I'm sure you don't. In fact, I guarantee you'll do one of four things 1) shift the topic, 2) disappear for a while and then shift the topic, 3) continue with an ad hominem, or 4) some combination of those.
Putting you back on 'ignore', again.
A friend of President Donald Trump, Christopher Ruddy, says that the president is “considering perhaps terminating” Special Counsel Robert Mueller — an action that, if carried out, would mean a crisis over the rule of law in the United States.
www.vox.com/2017/6/12/15788530/trump-firing-robert-mueller
What is 1kiki's opinion about terminating Mueller?
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Ah, the old ad hominem ... a SECOND-RATE special.
Originally posted by second:
Weren't you a Bernie person? When did you join the legal team defending the GOP?
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
I'm sure you don't. In fact, I guarantee you'll do one of four things 1) shift the topic, 2) disappear for a while and then shift the topic, 3) continue with an ad hominem, or 4) some combination of those.
Putting you back on 'ignore', again.
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:1kiki, that is five times in a row you promised to ignore me. Are you using ignore ironically, meaning not ignore? Or are you caught in loop? Is it time to reboot? Once you have, please answer the question everyone needs to know: Why does a Bernie supporter, such as yourself, join the Trump legal team? Joining makes perfect sense for Signym, but not for you. It is inconsistent. Maybe you are using irony because you are joking about supporting Trump, now? Or were you joking about supporting Bernie, back in 2016?
Originally posted by 1kiki:Quote:Ah, the old ad hominem ... a SECOND-RATE special.
Originally posted by second:
Weren't you a Bernie person? When did you join the legal team defending the GOP?
What does that have to do with Weissmann's overturned convictions, where his actions unanimously had the Supreme Court aghast? Or his prosecutorial misconduct? Or, after falsely instructing a witness to testify about hearsay conversation, and who appeared voluntarily, he then prosecuting him for perjury?
Do you have any response to the facts, SECOND-RATE?
I'm sure you don't. In fact, I guarantee you'll do one of four things 1) shift the topic, 2) disappear for a while and then shift the topic, 3) continue with an ad hominem, or 4) some combination of those.
Putting you back on 'ignore', again.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME