The wiretap tweet IS true (update)

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Wednesday, February 11, 2026 16:07
VIEWED: 18449
PAGE 17 of 18

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I can understand you are in denial. But have you read the post I made on 20 April? Obama did direct the illegal and treasonous actions and activities (Treason as defined in the Espionage Act), and his minions did perform his bidding, all violating the laws as well. So which do you admit, which of the specific actions I outlined do you agree were committed? Or which do you deny ever happened, specifically?

---

I don't agree or deny any of your specific actions that you outlined. I agree that Trump was spied on.

Quote:

---

That would be illegal, as I specified - and only Obama has committed this crime.

---

Would it? Who went to jail when the Access Hollywood tape on Trump came out?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Are you claiming that Obama's Executive Branch Administration, or any other Federal agency, leaked the Access Hollywood tape?

---

Please tell me you don't believe that's all that happened!

---

You mean regarding Access Hollywood tape?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
I just wanted to say a belated thanks for the information. It might go further without the 'libtard' name-calling, but I understand the frustration about people who're unable to deal with facts.

---

I wanted to thank you for reminding me about this subject. I am fair certain that I have already posted several times about the definition of this term, and the accurate application of it, but it seems that many have either never saw it, or read it, or have forgotten (all perfectly reasonable - who can remember everything that somebody else posted or said?), or have conveniently found excuses to deny that they are Libtards when they obviously fit the definition and application.
So let me review again.
Libtards are specific people or characters who selectively choose to be retarded only in clear relation to their Liberal beliefs and delusions. They may be able to balance their checkbook IRL, but if math does not agree with the diatribe of the Looney Lying Lefty Liberals they adore, they make the decision to ignore real world rationality in favor of the delusions of Liberalism. When Liberals declare that a huge drastic budget cut drops the budget from $9 Trillion down to only $11 Trillion, then somebody who chooses to forego sense and critical thought in favor of this delusion is, quite clearly, a Libtard - Retarded in the very specific parameters that their Liberal doctrine requires.
I hope that clarifies, again. There are no Libtards that have not made the choice and decision to be Libtards. This is also the reason that they render themselves devoid of credibility - they are proclaiming that they refuse to reason or be rational while they are reality-impaired.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
It appears some detractors in this thread are up-to-date on their FACTS Vaccine Booster shots, and seem incapable (or at the minimum, unwilling) of comprehending what the contributors of this thread are providing in terms of facts.

So perhaps we can iron out a few details in the framework, and then address which specific items the Libtards and other Democrats are in feverish denial about.

It looks like most of these illegal acts are covered under 50 U.S.C. Sec 1809 and 18 U.S.C. Sec 798, and provide both criminal sanctions as well as civil liability. Also 50 U.S. Code Sec 1813.

1. Obamabots target Trump and his campaign people for wiretapping, but dance and jump around the legalese terms of the law by claiming that they are "officially" targeting only foreign subjects who are most likely to be in phone conversations with the real targets, the Trump people. Only Libtards and other Democrats claim this is "normal" or "regular" or "common" practice, policy, or procedure. Practiced by every President all the way back to Benjamin Franklin's first term.
By avoiding the intent and spirit of the law while dancing around the letter of the law, they violated the spirit and intent of the law. At this point Libtards will start arguing what the definition of the word "is" is.

2. Obamabots intentionally violate US 50, Chapter 36, Subchapter I. B. IV. 1813. By refusing to mask the identities of "incidentally collected" American Citizen subjects of no National Security interest. This is illegal, fer every surveillance and for every person whose privacy is violated.

3. Illegal dissemination of the information to other Obamabots. See my March 22 post (the 49th post) of this thread for part of this.

4. Conspiracy to leak Classified information to non-authorized persons (political hacks), for the purpose of leaking the Classified information to non-authorized persons without Classified Clearance. This would include BimbObamabot Evelyn Farkas bragging about the Obamabot Army Conspiring to disseminate the Classified information (which she was not even authorized to have possession of - no "Need-To-Know" for her, a political Campaign Director for Hilliary, and no positi

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME