Real World Event Discussions

Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"

POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, April 14, 2025 23:28
VIEWED: 485499
PAGE 18 of 404

Friday, May 26, 2017 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
Paraphrasing what THGRRI said:
"Bein' a dry drunk is a hard way to go."

An alcoholic in Recovery is much happier as life improves.

To get there, tho, we have to like ourSelf more than
we like puffing up our Ego.

Humility can be a very good & somehow empowering thing.


... oooOO}{OOooo ...

I've found the meaning of life in Eastern Philosophy 1A.



Yeah O. You're rather eloquent way of speaking does justice once again to your avatar.

Thank you for putting it in a way that T would never, ever manage to be able to do if he lived to be 1,000 years old.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, May 26, 2017 12:49 AM

Had a weird 'hedline announsement' dream this morning.

I wuz dreaming sumthing about Roadkill (the beater car show I watch on youtube) and suddenly therez a dark gray on grainy lite gray low rez print hed line:

DEAL
MADE

It meant that Trump had manajd to make THE Middle East pease deal . It woke me up immediately at 11:31. It wuz so odd, I wuz haf expecting there to be sumthing in the newz, so turned on the alarm clock radio wich I hav tuned to a rite wing propaganda station. If there wuz anything going on in favor uv Trump, surely they woud be blathering about it. But no.

I coud see this happening.

Altho Trump iz an idiot & crooked az the Devil, he haz a talent for making dealz. Arguably the worldz greatest con man and maybe exactly the guy hoo coud make such a deal happen. Sumbudy hoo can pile on the BS so fast and deep that it smutherz decadez uv animosity. It woud fit with hiz itinerary - Schmooz the Saudi king, schmooz hiz fellow idiot Netenyahoo, schmooz the Pope, get them all lined up to endorse and enfors The Deal.

And it coud also save him from hiz Putin trouble. The GoPs coud uze the pozitiv clamor to drown out the investigation newz and boost Trump's popularity. 'Impeach the Prez hoo did the impossible? Youre crazy!'

Nothing showing up in the newz so far. I shoud go back to sleep.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, May 26, 2017 1:02 AM

Wouldn't that be novel?

When do you think the last time Peace is what saved a presidency? When's the last time anybody even tried?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, May 26, 2017 2:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
Paraphrasing what THGRRI said:
"Bein' a dry drunk is a hard way to go."

An alcoholic in Recovery is much happier as life improves.

To get there, tho, we have to like ourSelf more than
we like puffing up our Ego.

Humility can be a very good & somehow empowering thing.


... oooOO}{OOooo ...

I've found the meaning of life in Eastern Philosophy 1A.



Yeah O. You're rather eloquent way of speaking does justice once again to your avatar.

Thank you for putting it in a way that T would never, ever manage to be able to do if he lived to be 1,000 years old.



I cut and pasted a definition of a dry drunk for you Jack. This way you can't argue it's made up. I did this because your problem is with the messenger, and that blinds you to the truth. Same as it does in these threads. And that Jack, is my point.





NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, May 26, 2017 2:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I cut and pasted a definition of a dry drunk for you Jack. This way you can't argue it's made up. I did this because your problem is with the messenger, and that blinds you to the truth. Same as it does in these threads. And that Jack, is my point.



You had no point T. You were complaining about my behavior, which is no different than your own behavior. And then you're giving yourself a double standard to continue doing what you do because you, as far as we know, don't have a problem with substance abuse.

You knew that. You knew that I had you in a corner. That is why you did not reply directly to me. You wouldn't have said anything had O not swooped in and said his peace. Even then you did not reply directly to me. You spoke to him about me.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, May 26, 2017 5:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I cut and pasted a definition of a dry drunk for you Jack. This way you can't argue it's made up. I did this because your problem is with the messenger, and that blinds you to the truth. Same as it does in these threads. And that Jack, is my point.



You had no point T. You were complaining about my behavior, which is no different than your own behavior.

No need to sell yourself short. You make a lot of sense now that you're not drunk posting. T still makes less sense than you did when you were drunk all the time (that we saw).
Quote:

And then you're giving yourself a double standard to continue doing what you do because you, as far as we know, don't have a problem with substance abuse.

You knew that. You knew that I had you in a corner. That is why you did not reply directly to me. You wouldn't have said anything had O not swooped in and said his peace. Even then you did not reply directly to me. You spoke to him about me.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, May 26, 2017 6:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I cut and pasted a definition of a dry drunk for you Jack. This way you can't argue it's made up. I did this because your problem is with the messenger, and that blinds you to the truth. Same as it does in these threads. And that Jack, is my point.



You had no point T. You were complaining about my behavior, which is no different than your own behavior. And then you're giving yourself a double standard to continue doing what you do because you, as far as we know, don't have a problem with substance abuse.

You knew that. You knew that I had you in a corner. That is why you did not reply directly to me. You wouldn't have said anything had O not swooped in and said his peace. Even then you did not reply directly to me. You spoke to him about me.



I made my point. You are not capable of seeing that. Or that your points of view are uneducated and based on anecdotes and emotion Jack, not reality. That's what separates you from those you choose to argue with. They offer up cited and researched material. You offer emotional responses based on incidents, persons or hear say. You haven't made but a few rational, reasonable or constructive observations.

The rest of what you say is saturated with paranoia and grandiose thinking. Can you see through walls as well as read minds?





NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, May 26, 2017 6:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I cut and pasted a definition of a dry drunk for you Jack. This way you can't argue it's made up. I did this because your problem is with the messenger, and that blinds you to the truth. Same as it does in these threads. And that Jack, is my point.



You had no point T. You were complaining about my behavior, which is no different than your own behavior. And then you're giving yourself a double standard to continue doing what you do because you, as far as we know, don't have a problem with substance abuse.

You knew that. You knew that I had you in a corner. That is why you did not reply directly to me. You wouldn't have said anything had O not swooped in and said his peace. Even then you did not reply directly to me. You spoke to him about me.



I made my point. You are not capable of seeing that. Or that your points of view are uneducated and based on anecdotes and emotion Jack, not reality. That's what separates you from those you choose to argue with. They offer up cited and researched material. You offer emotional responses based on incidents, persons or hear say. You haven't made but a few rational, reasonable or constructive observations.

The rest of what you say is saturated with paranoia and grandiose thinking. Can you see through walls as well as read minds?



Once again, you aren't even talking about the point you were originally trying to make which is that you can behave however you feel like behaving because you don't have substance abuse issues. Simply even bringing this up to me is an example of you doing what you say that I am not entitled to do because of my history.

You do exactly what you are accusing me of every single day you post here, yet somehow you feel that you are entitled to do so because you, at least to our knowledge, have never abused alcohol or drugs.

You are a very petty person who acts purely on an emotional basis and when you lose an argument you resort to personal attacks, and throwing judgements around.

Please, do continue this as we can just fill yet another thread with more examples of your flawed arguments.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, May 26, 2017 7:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I cut and pasted a definition of a dry drunk for you Jack. This way you can't argue it's made up. I did this because your problem is with the messenger, and that blinds you to the truth. Same as it does in these threads. And that Jack, is my point.



You had no point T. You were complaining about my behavior, which is no different than your own behavior. And then you're giving yourself a double standard to continue doing what you do because you, as far as we know, don't have a problem with substance abuse.

You knew that. You knew that I had you in a corner. That is why you did not reply directly to me. You wouldn't have said anything had O not swooped in and said his peace. Even then you did not reply directly to me. You spoke to him about me.



I made my point. You are not capable of seeing that. Or that your points of view are uneducated and based on anecdotes and emotion Jack, not reality. That's what separates you from those you choose to argue with. They offer up cited and researched material. You offer emotional responses based on incidents, persons or hear say. You haven't made but a few rational, reasonable or constructive observations.

The rest of what you say is saturated with paranoia and grandiose thinking. Can you see through walls as well as read minds?



Once again, you aren't even talking about the point you were originally trying to make which is that you can behave however you feel like behaving because you don't have substance abuse issues. Simply even bringing this up to me is an example of you doing what you say that I am not entitled to do because of my history.

You do exactly what you are accusing me of every single day you post here, yet somehow you feel that you are entitled to do so because you, at least to our knowledge, have never abused alcohol or drugs.

You are a very petty person who acts purely on an emotional basis and when you lose an argument you resort to personal attacks, and throwing judgements around.

Please, do continue this as we can just fill yet another thread with more examples of your flawed arguments.



No Jack, that's you who'll go round and round. It's like when you get upset with SECOND and others, as though they are posting to you when they are not. You criticize them because to you they have changed topics. You're doing it again Jack. I made the point I wished to and it's on the money. Hey look, you've caught your tail. Good job Jack.







NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, May 26, 2017 8:22 AM

It doesn't mean anything yet but it is a point of interest.




Jared Kushner is under scrutiny in the FBI's Russia investigation

Federal investigators are looking into meetings Kushner held in December with Russia's ambassador and a banker from Moscow, CBS News' Scott Pelley reported on "CBS Evening News" on Thursday. The banker, Sergey Gorkov, is the head of VEB Bank, a state-owned Russian entity that is the subject of U.S. government sanctions. Gorkov was trained by Russia's Federal Security Service, or FSB.


http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jared-kushner-is-the-white-house-official-
under-investigation-for-ties-to-russians
/





NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME