Real World Event Discussions

Out Like Flynn!

POSTED BY: ElvisChrist
UPDATED: Sunday, December 13, 2020 05:41
VIEWED: 12259
PAGE 9 of 13

SIGNYM

Friday, February 17, 2017 12:10 AM

So, GSTRING, aside from making me the focus of your post (in your usual trollish fashion) do you have anything ON TOPIC to say?

-----------

"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake

THGRRI

Friday, February 17, 2017 4:50 AM

Again, SIG THE TROLL. They alter the text to make it appear as though it is saying something else.
You ignorant bitch.

It's why they hide their identities. I've said that here at least a dozen times. You continue to ignore the truth of it. Which explains why you hold the title of Russian troll.

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Again you miss the point. You keep going back to the well of misinformation as your source. What you posted was written by people who HIDE THEIR IDENTITIES.
BUT POST LINKS TO THE ORIGINAL SOURCE. SO THAT YOU, IF YOU'RE NOT TOO LAZY OR STUPID, (you seem to be both) CAN FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF.

And having had your ass handed to you on what Kucinich said ... and how he implicitly criticized deep-state tools like you ... you try to divert the conversation and bury the posts. That doesn't even deserve a "nice try", troll.

-----------

"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake

---------------------

SECOND

Friday, February 17, 2017 4:57 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
REPOSTED
Quote:
If Trump had really intended to drain the swamp, fight the deep state, make America great, he should have planned ahead.
Agreed

Quote:
Signym, that means it is not an either/or choice between "deep state? Or the Trump state." I don't think Trump has the brainpower or stamina to run the government. That leaves nobody in charge.

"Nobody" is not a choice. It's either the elected President of the USA, at least nominally in charge, or it's whoever the deep state chooses. You and I don't have a choice of "neither of the above".

Quote:
Trump could respond to your idea (certainly not mine) of the entire CIA staging a coup d'état against Trump by retaliating.
And hopefully, if Trump can't figure out a way, his advisors can, and he will be smart enough to listen.

I voted for Trump for a reason. I knew ahead of time, and said so quite often, than Trump would be a loose cannon and- look!- Trump is a loose cannon! But Trump is NOT a deep-stater, or a transnational global financialist; he's far too nationalistic for that. IF I HAVE A CHOICE BETWEEN BACKING INTERNATIONAL FASCISM VERSUS NATIONAL FASCISM, I'LL CHOOSE NATIONAL FASCISM. Because if the control is here, in the USA, WE (Americans) have the possibility of fighting for our future. But if the nexus of control is spread across the globe, and the USA has no more control over its own economic, environmental, energy, labor etc policies than (say) Greece, but must bend to the will of some unreachable unelected organization someplace else ... WHAT THEN, SECOND?

I did not vote for Trump because I am extremely familiar with the type. Texas is infested with little wannabe Trumps, little super-patriots waving their huge American flags on poles outside their businesses. The Trumps of Texas and New York state are loud, aggressive, greedy, and, when they are not looking after their own interests, lazy and ignorant. People like Trump run and hide from people who aren't profitable for them. Trump will do a terrible job for you, Signym. It is in his nature. Trump gave a press conference today and he revealed himself:
www.vox.com/2017/2/16/14640956/trump-press-conference-flynn-fired

or there is this Trump talk:

ALEXANDER: You said today that you had the biggest electoral margin since Ronald Reagan, 304, 306 electoral votes. But President Obama had 365....

TRUMP: Well, I'm talking about Republicans.

ALEXANDER: George H.W. Bush, 426 when he won as president. So why should Americans trust you?

TRUMP: Well no, I was given that information. I don't know, I was just given—we had a very, very big margin.

ALEXANDER: I guess my question is why Americans should trust you when you use information...

TRUMP: Well, I don't know, I was given that information. I was given—I actually, I've seen that information around.
www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/02/my-job-just-got-lot-easier

Trump is a lazy ignoramus who can't talk sense. And Signym voted for him. Signym's whys for voting Trump are as bad as Trump's explanations for why he fired Flynn.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

SIGNYM

Friday, February 17, 2017 5:36 PM

AH, THE TRUTH WILL OUT: MARK ZUCKERBERG HATES AMERICA

Mark Zuckerberg Rejects "America First", wants something else OVER AMERICA.

Quote:
Mark Zuckerberg Rejects "America First", Calls For Global Community

First, there is no such thing as "the global community". That presumes the "global community" have a commonality of interests .... We want more food and less war ... and the means to make it happen. IF that were the case, there wouldn't be so many wars, and so many millions of displaced people. Mark Zuckerberg has yet to stop a war.

Quote:
Hot on the heels of retailers who have halted sales of Ivanka Trump's clothing line in protest against Trump (and free marketing buzz), the tech "resistance" against Trump got its lead from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckeberg who on Thursday posted a lengthy note "rebuking isolationist “America First” sentiment, and touting the merits of globalization and a “global community” working for innovation and progress."

And deliver poverty and tyranny. So, spies and software giants find themselves in the same "globalization" camp.

Quote:
In short, the CEO of the "social network", whose business model is predicated upon uninhibited globalization allowing advertisers to reach into every corner of the world with 3 second video clips, is calling for a global government. Not all that surprising.

So tell me , Mark, how has your technology made the world a better place? Other than for advertising, that is?

Quote:
As the Daily Beast, which first reported about Zuckerberg's post, summarizes:

Discouraged by the underlying suspicion of foreign entities, as seen during the 2016 election and the rise of President Trump, Zuckerberg wrote that he wants to refocus Facebook on helping people ~~come together~~ access products across borders.

“We have to build a global community that works for ~~everyone~~ me . I really don’t have much doubt that this is the right direction to go in the long term.” Part of his goal, he wrote, is to make Facebook a global community that is ~~supportive, safe, informed, civically engaged, and inclusive.~~ supportive of our products

Some more excerpts from Zuckerberg's sermon for globalization:

On our journey to connect the world, we often discuss products we're building and updates on our business. Today I want to focus on the most important question of all: ~~are we building the world we all want~~ Am I making as much money as I want?

History is the story of how we've learned to come together in ever greater numbers -- from tribes to cities to nations. At each step, we built social infrastructure like communities, media and governments to ~~empower us to achieve things we couldn't on our own~~ make sure that most of us were heading in the same direction, which was usually the direction that made a few people fabulously wealthy

Today we are close to taking our next step. Our greatest opportunities are now global -- like spreading ~~prosperity and freedom~~ poverty and powerlessness , promoting ~~peace and understanding~~ advertising and propaganda , lifting people out of ~~poverty~~ independence , and accelerating ~~science~~ conformity . Our greatest challenges also need

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

SECOND

Friday, February 17, 2017 6:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
AH, THE TRUTH WILL OUT: MARK ZUCKERBERG HATES AMERICA,

Seriously, he hates America, Even the THOUGHT of America makes him sick, Yanno, kinda like THUGR, who can't even imagine what he's FOR about America.

Sarcasm on. Zuckerberg must hate America because, with 2 billion users of Facebook, many who are not living in the USA, Zuckerberg is in charge of the 3rd largest network in the world. The 2nd largest network is the Internet with 3.5 billion users. The largest network is Money with 7.3 billion users. Signym could argue that the Internet and Money are without net value to super-patriotic Signym because those networks extend across national borders, as does Facebook. Close the borders to save American jobs and save American lives from terrorists! Sarcasm off.

http://onlyagame.typepad.com/only_a_game/2017/02/top-ten-cybergs.html

Oh, I forgot to mention that Trump's dementia is starting to show. If you can watch his news conference all the way to the end and think he has got all his marbles, you have lost your marbles. The entire point of this press conference seemed to be directed at one thing: accusing the press of being horrible and dishonest. This came up in nearly every Trump answer. This is a great strategy for shoring up his base, of course. As near as I can tell, conservatives all thought this dumpster fire of a press conference was a terrific performance. Sad.

The nine most insane moments from Donald Trump’s reality-challenged press conference
https://qz.com/912956/real-leaks-fake-news-nine-insane-moments-from-tr
umps-press-conference/

Here Are Your Highlights of Today's Trump Press Meltdown
www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/02/here-are-your-highlights-todays
-trump-press-meltdown

Donald Trump’s explanation for why he fired Michael Flynn makes no sense
www.vox.com/2017/2/16/14640956/trump-press-conference-flynn-fired

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, February 17, 2017 10:26 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
The first premise of your post was that it was not legal to post the contents of other peoples emails, therefore we did not see Clintons.

That is not at all what I said. The media told people that it was illegal for us to read Clinton's emails, therefore we should let them read them and tell us what was in them. Take a much needed course in reading comprehension for adults at your local community college.

Per CNN:

Quote:
remember... it's illegal to possess these stolen documents. It's different for the media. So everything you learn about this, you're learning from US.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, February 17, 2017 10:29 PM

ADD = Attention Deficit Disorder.

I'm pretty sure everyone in the developed nations of the world know that except for THGGRI.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

THGRRI

Friday, February 17, 2017 11:03 PM

We all remember the past year and a half and SIGs’ barrage of attacks against Hillary, and her staunch support of Trump. The same SIG who argued vehemently Trump would be a much better choice for President, is now finding ways to post how he sucks. Think about it. It’s very consistent. She bashes everything American. Trump is now the president so it’s time for her to pivot. Trump is bad, because Trump represents America. It will seem a bit Schizophrenic because she will be praising his support for Putin, until or if that changes, but Trump will now come under her attack. This is the point. Not what she will be saying against him.

As for her labeling Zuckerberg un-American, that too is obvious. When someone suggests she is heartless, she starts a thread to show she is not. Usually it’s over the top if you know what I mean. That’s all this is. She is calling Zuckerberg un-American as if to say hey, look at me, this proves I love America.

Let me be clear about what I believe gives the most insight into what SIG is about. She constantly cites untrustworthy and fake news sources to assist her in “trolling theses threads”. It would be great if she was confronted about her sourcing by others when she does that. I believe when she quotes others, who themselves are quoting others through untrustworthy sources, (by people who hide their identities), discussing anything but her source, is to argue against material she has posted that is subjective and void of the realities of the actual topic. To me it only makes sense to not discuss the topic, and instead call her out on her source.

---------------------

THGRRI

Friday, February 17, 2017 11:12 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
The first premise of your post was that it was not legal to post the contents of other peoples emails, therefore we did not see Clintons.

That is not at all what I said. The media told people that it was illegal for us to read Clinton's emails, therefore we should let them read them and tell us what was in them. Take a much needed course in reading comprehension for adults at your local community college.

Per CNN:

Quote:
remember... it's illegal to possess these stolen documents. It's different for the media. So everything you learn about this, you're learning from US.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Jack you're chasing your tail here. You'll have to do that on your own.

---------------------

6IXSTRINGJACK

Saturday, February 18, 2017 2:03 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Jack you're chasing your tail here. You'll have to do that on your own.

It's becoming clear that I'm wasting my time speaking with you. You suffer from some form of learning disability or something that makes it impossible to have intelligent conversation with you.

Do Right, Be Right. :)