Trump talks about respect for women: Grab 'em by the P***Y!

POSTED BY: ElvisChrist
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 03:18
VIEWED: 23001
PAGE 4 of 16

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NEXT PAGE

SECOND

Sunday, October 9, 2016 7:51 PM

Dilbert's creator, Scott Adams, wrote:

We fine citizens of the United States find ourselves playing some sort of sex abuse poker in which we have to assign value to various alleged sex crimes to see which alleged rapist/groper/enabler combination we want to inhabit the White House and represent our national brand. Let’s call that situation “not ideal.”

My view is that if either Clinton or Trump can be judged by the weight of the allegations against them, both are 100% unfit for the office. I think Trump supporters think it’s worth the hit to our national brand just to get some specific improvements in the country.

Clinton supporters have been telling me for a few days that any visible support for Trump makes you a supporter of sex abuse. From a persuasion standpoint, that actually makes sense. If people see it that way, that’s the reality you have to deal with. I choose to not be part of that reality so I moved my endorsement to Gary Johnson.

I encourage all Clinton supporters to do the same, and for the same reason. I don’t know if any of the allegations against the Clintons are true, but since we are judging each other on associations, you don’t want to be seen as supporting sex abuse by putting an alleged duo of abusers (the perp and the clean-up crew) into office. I think you will agree that it doesn’t matter if any of the allegations are true, because the stink from a mountain of allegations – many that seem credible to observers – is bad for the national brand too. To even consider putting the Clintons back in the White House is an insult to women and every survivor of abuse.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151552548531/why-i-endorse-gary-johnson-t
his-week

I'm not about to explain why Scott Adams' blog is wrong about everything. I just wanted to show what he wrote after switching his endorsement from Trump to Johnson.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

THGRRI

Sunday, October 9, 2016 8:17 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by DEVERSE:
Defending Trump because he is a "man's man" (the Republican view).

1. What he did 10 years ago is not important, let's focus on what Clinton did 20 years ago.
2. What he did 10 years ago is just being used as a distraction to the real issues of the election, let's talk about what Clinton did 20 years ago because that isn't a distraction.
3. Don't judge him on what he did 10 years ago, we need to judge Clinton on what her husband did 20 years ago.
4. He made those comments when he was a Democrat.
5. Bill Clinton has said worse things, so its OK for Trump to say slightly less offensive things.
6. He's a changed man from 10 years ago because he is so respectful of women now, like Rosie O'Donnell, Gail Collins, Megyn Kelly and Alicia Machado.

Besides, he apologized and that makes everything OK now.

Oh let the sun beat down upon my face;
With stars to fill my dream;
I am a traveler of both time and space;
To be where I have been

The Washington Post reporter who broke this story of Trump says he has documented evidence of Trump acting this way from 1990 to 2010. Even in conversations about his own daughter. It's telling how the Republican Party that always claims the moral high ground has backed this guy for so long.

Funny how the Clinton haters that think all's fair and who have attacked her at every opportunity, are now claiming foul. I would remind them no one could survive the Republican onslaught the Clintons have endured for thirty years. And the guy they have backed couldn't last one election cycle because he is so morally corrupt.

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

SECOND

Sunday, October 9, 2016 9:09 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:

The Washington Post reporter who broke this story of Trump says he has documented evidence of Trump acting this way from 1990 to 2010. Even in conversations about his own daughter. It's telling how the Republican Party that always claims the moral high ground has backed this guy for so long.

That reporter could have covered an anonymous “Jane Doe” filing a federal lawsuit against Donald Trump, accusing him of raping her in 1994 when she was thirteen years old. The mainstream media ignored the filing.
www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944
.html

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:

Funny how the Clinton haters that think all's fair and who have attacked her at every opportunity, are now claiming foul.

The Clinton haters have reacted, as always, without restraint: "3. I assume that publication of this recording was okayed by the Clinton campaign. And if not, the public will assume so anyway. That opens the door for Trump to attack in a proportionate way. No more mister-nice-guy. Gloves are off. Nothing is out of bounds. It is fair to assume that Bill and Hillary are about to experience the worst weeks of their lives."
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151504993671/why-does-this-happen-on-my-v
acation-the-trump

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

1KIKI

Sunday, October 9, 2016 9:25 PM

Trump now has 13.4% chance while only a month ago it was 50/50 chance.

Even 538 has said - often - that earlier forecasts are less reliable and subject to shifts because people haven't made up their minds yet. And it's true of any race, not just this one.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-users-guide-to-fivethirtyeights-
2016-general-election-forecast/
Be conservative early and aggressive late. Fluctuations in the polls in the summer are often statistical noise or short-term bounces. The model is trained to be conservative in reacting to them. Fluctuations late in the race are more meaningful, and the model will be more aggressive.
It's not because of Trump, and it's not because 'people' are such sheep, and you really, REALLY have no point to make. I suggest you read the entire page that I linked.

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

1KIKI

Sunday, October 9, 2016 9:42 PM

Meanwhile - keep focusing on Trump, little sheep! Pay no attention to the fact that before him it was Assad, and before him it was Qaddafi, and before him it was Yanukovich (what, did you forget him already?), and before him it was ISIS (until they became our paid mercs), and before them it was Arab Spring and the joys of rtp everywhere!, and before that it was Hussein, and before him it was the Taliban, and before them it was Osama bin Laden - until Bush stopped thinking about him, and you did too.

And after Donald I'll even predict who the next person is you're going to be stampeded to hate, because you're such motherfucking USEFUL sheep.

PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE SMOKING CLUSTERFUCK RUINS WE'VE LEFT BEHIND EVERYWHERE!

HATE, HATE, HATE !!!!!!

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

SECOND

Sunday, October 9, 2016 10:25 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Meanwhile - keep focusing on Trump, little sheep! Pay no attention to the fact that before him it was Assad, and before him it was Qaddafi, and before him it was Yanukovich (what, did you forget him already?), and before him it was ISIS (until they became our paid mercs), and before them it was Arab Spring and the joys of rtp everywhere!, and before that it was Hussein, and before him it was the Taliban, and before them it was Osama bin Laden - until Bush stopped thinking about him.

And after Donald I'll even predict who the next person is you're going to be stampeded to hate, because you're such motherfucking USEFUL sheep.

PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE SMOKING CLUSTERFUCK RUINS WE'VE LEFT BEHIND EVERYWHERE!

HATE, HATE, HATE !!!!!!

You're just not tough enough for this cruel world. It is not hate. It is indifference. Americans are indifferent about dead foreigners killed by the USA's military. They are indifferent about poor Americans, too. Well, that is not exactly true. Democrats care a little bit, but not too much!, because caring too much opens the Democrats to very effective attacks by Republicans that your taxes are being wasted on helping lazy, worthless welfare-cheaters. If Americans weren’t so indifferent toward people not exactly like themselves, US politics would be much more admirable. Then the world wouldn't be so cruel, would it?

Now that Tic Tacs are on a 24/7 cable loop as Donald Trump's favored breath mint before assaulting women, they feel the need to put out a statement:

https://twitter.com/TicTacUSA/status/784831611531436032

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

SIGNYM

Sunday, October 9, 2016 10:27 PM

Quote:
The Washington Post reporter who broke this story of Trump says he has documented evidence of Trump acting this way from 1990 to 2010. Even in conversations about his own daughter. It's telling how the Republican Party that always claims the moral high ground has backed this guy for so long.

Funny how the Clinton haters that think all's fair and who have attacked her at every opportunity, are now claiming foul. I would remind them no one could survive the Republican onslaught the Clintons have endured for thirty years. And the guy they have backed couldn't last one election cycle because he is so morally corrupt.

BULLSHIT

You, more than most, have a giant double standard stuck up your ass.

Trump is a terrible person. He talks nasty about women.
Hillary is a terrible person. When Bill went around horndogging and raping/ assaulting/intimidating/romancing women - and TO THIS DAY flies on the "Lolita Express" - Hillary went out of her way to publicly dismiss and attack these women.

Trumps has stiffed some small business people.
Hillary has had people killed and destroyed nations, and laughed and clapped her hands about it. You'd be hard-pressed to find a Trump equivalent.

Trump has a sketchy Foundation. He has used the LEGAL loopholes to avoid taxes. HE'S A BUSINESSMAN, and has behaved like a businessman should.
Bill and Hillary have their own sketchy Foundation, but unlike Trump - who uses his Foundation for business purposes - Hillary and Bill use their Foundation for their own political purposes (ie stuffing money into their pockets and political campaigns). For example, there is a Haitian activist who has begged NYS to stop allowing the Clinton Foundation to collect contributions from ("Steal money from" was her phrase) people because so much of the various Haitian relief funds under Bill Clinton have disappeared.

Given the seriousness of the issues at play, should the Presidency be based on who has the biggest potty-mouth?

I agree with KIKI: You people have lost the thread of your own story.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

SIGNYM

Sunday, October 9, 2016 10:35 PM

Quote:
You're just not tough enough for this cruel world. It is not hate. It is indifference. Americans are indifferent about dead foreigners killed by the USA's military. They are indifferent about poor Americans, too. Well, that is not exactly true. Democrats care a little bit, but not too much!

And YOU - the nice, caring, rational, liberal person that you are - are willing to go along with the lies and the indifference, to defend them, if necessary, in order to protect your opinion of yourself as a "nice person". Which is why you also have a big double standard stuck up your ass.

If a Republican politician had said anything about "private" and "public" positions, we'd never hear the end of it. You'd be apoplectic from here until Xmas 2100. You have a brain. You even claim to be able to use it. Do you suppose you can use it for something other than self-rationalization?

Quote:
If Americans weren’t so indifferent toward people not exactly like themselves, US politics would be much more admirable. Then the world wouldn't be so cruel, would it?

Do you even hear yourself anymore? Here you are, instead of trying to change American cruelty, using "their" cruelty to justify yours. Doesn't that make YOU cruel, too?

Hubby is right: Most Americans don't respond to logic, facts, ethics, or long-term interests. The only thing most Americans respond to is force. We will only change when we are forced to change, and since we won't change of our own volition, someone else will force it on us.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

THGRRI

Sunday, October 9, 2016 10:46 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:

The Washington Post reporter who broke this story of Trump says he has documented evidence of Trump acting this way from 1990 to 2010. Even in conversations about his own daughter. It's telling how the Republican Party that always claims the moral high ground has backed this guy for so long.
That reporter could have covered an anonymous “Jane Doe” filing a federal lawsuit against Donald Trump, accusing him of raping her in 1994 when she was thirteen years old. The mainstream media ignored the filing.
www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944
.html
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:

Funny how the Clinton haters that think all's fair and who have attacked her at every opportunity, are now claiming foul.
The Clinton haters have reacted, as always, without restraint: "3. I assume that publication of this recording was okayed by the Clinton campaign. And if not, the public will assume so anyway. That opens the door for Trump to attack in a proportionate way. No more mister-nice-guy. Gloves are off. Nothing is out of bounds. It is fair to assume that Bill and Hillary are about to experience the worst weeks of their lives."
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151504993671/why-does-this-happen-on-my-v
acation-the-trump

This video was brought to light because it is sensational. It has nothing to do with the Clintons. Another truism is that Bill Clinton is not the democratic nominee, Hillary is. If I was Hillary I remind Trump of that.

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

SIGNYM

Sunday, October 9, 2016 10:46 PM

I have no interest in the results of the "debates". Those are just cage-matches, arranged as our "circus" to distract us from the real agenda of the deep state.

For me, the fact that "mainstream" Republicans are ditching Trump is one more reason to vote FOR him. BUSINESS AS USUAL got us to where we are now. The LAST thing we need is "more of the same". The further and further Trump disassociates from the "mainstream" (ie. "bought and paid for") the more committed I become. The money-changers' tables in the temple need to be turned over. I'm willing to turn them over.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NEXT PAGE