PARIS UNDER ATTACK
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Tuesday, June 30, 2026 15:17
VIEWED: 11171
PAGE 5 of 10
Thank you for that cogent explanation. Maybe G will understand it better from you than from me.
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Well, you would be right. Saudi Arabia has been benefiting from USA policy and a relaxed attitude about the export of Wahhabism for 40 years. What looked like disorder and destabilization was merely Wahhabis establishing their territory. In fact, we found it handy in Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Libya, and we sure tried to make a go of it in Syria.
So you see winners in the Middle East in recent history? Who would they be? Come on, you're so bright you must have a list handy... Saudi Arabia no doubt.
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
Why do you guys always have to take red or blue pills, can't you go independent? libertarian? constitutional?
anyway speaking of red pills, Trump on Paris
Trump weighs in
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If you ever wondered where SIG got her posting style he you go. Hey JAYNEZTOWON, must you post as many pictures and videos as you can. This is an opinion posting area not a place for people to watch the news. What is it about you that don't think others are capable of turning on their TV'S and watching the news?
Second, since in the past and now in the present all you can do is talk about Muslim immigrants, I will continue to point out your blatant bigotry and use the posts of your supporters here to highlight theirs.
It's very telling that you contend that every Muslim has the same agenda as ISIS.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
DANG! THOSE ISIL-Daesh wahhabis sure know how to activate enemies, don't they? The USA would have been content to ineffectually peck at them forever, but now we'll be forced to "do something"!
ISIS Threatens Attacks On Washington DC In New Video
Quote:Until ISIL runs out of warm bodies
As "details" and "intelligence" surface regarding the attacks that left 129 dead in Paris on Friday, and as French warplanes drop bombs on Raqqa, you had to have known it was only a matter of time before ISIS released another Hollywood special to, i) do some more gloating about the "successful" assault on the French capital, and ii) threaten France and anyone assissting them with still more attacks in retailiation for retailiating.
In short, this is an endless loop
Quote:
of attack-retailiate-attack-retailiate that, if both sides want it to, could easily end up seeing American, French, and British boots on the ground in eastern Syria, setting the stage for - you guessed it - the final battle for the political future of Assad once the ISIS distraction has been relegated to annals of terrorist history. After all, the West has always hung on to the "Assad's brutality attracts terrorists" line and so, it would be easy enough to claim that in order to keep Syria "ISIS-free," Assad has to go
This is called "the day after" problem. It's like the attack on Sinjar, which accomplished with combined Peshmerga (USA-affiliated Kurds) and PKK/YPG (socialist/ feminist Kurds). It may have been successful, but what happens the day after?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-16/isis-threatens-attacks-washin
gton-dc-new-video
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's like whack a mole around here...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:
That's a very specific example Jo, and one I doubt is very prevalent to your overall point %-wise.
Its only a matter uv degree between extreemz. Selling a baby to a pedofile at the bottom end uv the spectrum all the way up to the 10,000$ per owr lawyer defending the same skumbag, even tho he hates him, just kuz he needz the money. Sum peeps are lucky enuf to earn money doing sumthing they like and its sumthing beneficial to sosiety. Everybody else iz selling their life, wether its a hi prised hooker in Las Vegas, or an overworked machinist in a car factory.
If peepl werent so casual about giving up their time, it woud fors the money grabberz to pay more.
Quote:
This is the point I'm most interested in:Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
Its really the same everywhere, even if it seemz 'equitable' - welth iz being jenerated, but most peeps are not getting a fair share.
Pls explain - I have a feeling we'll have serious disagreement on this, especially the "fair share" part.
You probably hav notionz uv 'a fair dayz pay for a fair dayz work'. Thats how thingz shoud be. Its still a viable arranjement in isolation, but considering the state uv the worldz economy, its a joke to amuze rich peepl.
A system haz been created that extracts welth from everybody who duznt hav money and passez it up to thoze who do. It haz bekum so efficient that the rich can aksidentaly 'press the gas pedal' too hard and exeed the ability uv the rest uv us to keep up! Thats essentially wut happened to cauze the collapse in 2008.
Morgaj iz the main devise uzed to pump welth out uv our pockets. But its really everything you need or want to buy. Investorz (welthy peepl & organizationz) will grab a major chunk uv anything that looks like peepl will pay for then uze it to extract az much az possibl. Got an invention? If its a benefit to sosiety, but duznt appear to hav any money potential, buzz off, chump. If its a new salt/fat/sugar snack that nobody can rezist, welkum aboard! Lets see how cheap we can make it and how much we can charj. Who carez if its going to cauze hart attaks?
Quote:
Maybe we'll just have to disagree. If all the bad bankers were rounded up and punished and all of their stolen money returned to wherever they stole it, none of us are going to see any of it in our bank accounts the next day. Minimum wage isn't going to rise to $25 an hour without a cheeseburger also rising in price. But maybe you have another solution or observation.
Its not just the bad bankerz. Its the entire system. Banks are suppoz to be just the pipes, tanks and pumps that the money flowz thru. Insted, they hav bekum a jiant parasite that drainz money out uv the economy and contributes nothing.
About wajez, you hav to ask yourself this: How much money iz going into McDonaldz every day and how much endz up in the pockets uv the peepl doing the actual work? If you subtrakted all the ownerz, upper manajment, shareholderz and the to CEO, CFO and other C_O guyz, how much coud you pay the workerz without chanjing the prise uv the food?
Now suppoze you got rid uv all the det on the real estate, bildingz and equipment? Another huje unproductiv drain lifted. How much coud the burger flipperz get now?
The overwelming majority uv the money going into McDonaldz, and really all companiez,iz not going to the peepl doing the real work.
And its only going to get worse az automation duz more & more uv the work. In the not too distant future, the entire pay-for-work thing iz going to dry up. Then how do you get money to flow thru sosiety? Everybody who duznt 'own' will be out uv luck and thoze at the bottom end uv ownership will start falling off.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.nooalf.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That my friend is the essential problem of capitalism, where people who do the work don't get 100% of the value they produce. So workers can't afford to buy what they make. And owners are incentivised to pay their workers less and less in order to make more and more profit. Automation is the final step, where you have a machine that can go 24/7 and you pay workers not at all.
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
New Debate on Surveillance Limits
By SCOTT SHANE 9:11 PM ET
John O. Brennan criticized “hand-wringing” over spying and said restrictions on surveillance made it harder to find terrorists.
My coworkers and I came up with a much better solution. You find who's been funding these groups - like Saudi Arabia - and when there's one attack, they lose an oil field. Another attack, they lose another. And so on.
The attacks will stop.
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME