A new kind of Ebola?

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 02:42
VIEWED: 11272
PAGE 6 of 11

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NEXT PAGE

THGRRI

Sunday, August 10, 2014 10:17 PM

Sig, I point to your motivations instead of what you post because your motivations fuel your preconceptions. Those preconceptions lead you to peruse false interpretations of the facts put forth by propaganda news sites and to misrepresent what it says at reliable sites. Just as you misrepresent what I and others say here in response to your posts.

SIGNYM

Sunday, August 10, 2014 10:32 PM

THUGR: I point to your motivations instead of what you post because your motivations fuel your preconceptions. Those preconceptions lead you to peruse false interpretations of the facts put forth by propaganda news sites and to misrepresent what it says at reliable sites. Just as you misrepresent what I and others say here in response to your posts. And the reason WHY you misinterpret so heavily is because....

--------------
THUGR is a know-nothing militarist.

THGRRI

Sunday, August 10, 2014 10:35 PM

I don't think so Sig...

SIGNYM

Sunday, August 10, 2014 10:37 PM

I don't think so, THUGR.

--------------
THUGR is a know-nothing militarist.

THGRRI

Sunday, August 10, 2014 10:48 PM

It is sad how you have lost the ability to speak for yourself so you are left with cutting and pasting my words to make your points. 1kiki does that as well.

Very sad indeed.

1KIKI

Monday, August 11, 2014 1:03 AM

"You mean my repeated suggestions not to trust any source?"

No, it's that you say one thing and do another. When Kiev says that Russia is attacking across the border and it's posted from WashPost - do you object? When Mal4 repeatedly posted 'facts' from Sky News (facts which were not found anywhere else) did you object? When Signy posted irrefitable videos from Odessa, did you accept them?

Your mistrust, which you claim to wield fairly, is exquisitely selective. If you agree with an item, you accept it whole cloth, source and facts be damned. If you have any kind of personal itch about an item - you don't like the facts or the source - no amount of validity will move you.

Anyway, believe it or not, I have a life. And it doesn't include spending endless amounts of time on people who are so comfortable with their biases they don't even know they have them.

SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

THGRRI

Monday, August 11, 2014 1:06 AM

Your repeated suggestions not to trust any source comes directly from G. You saying it when the facts show you do not practice what you preach is funny and does not go unnoticed by the myself and hopefully others here as well.

The rest is you accusing others of posting as you do which is even funnier. It's called bait and switch.

THGRRI

Monday, August 11, 2014 2:04 AM

Are you paying attention Magon?

Quote:
….1kiki
"You mean my repeated suggestions not to trust any source?"

Taking what G says and adapting it as her own as though that is what she has always been about, even though we know this to be false.

Quote:
….1kiki
When Kiev says that Russia is attacking across the border and it's posted from WashPost - do you object?

Meaningless and subjective. No prof to suggest Kiev was the only source the Washington Post relied on, if what 1kiki says about the story existing is even true. If it is it may have followed a statement put out by our State Department or may even have been confirmed by other sources. At any rate it maybe near impossible to go back and refute. Meaningless…and what she will post as not being answered in her follow up post. "So you refuse to answer what I said or so you admit not believing the truth". Is what she will follow with.

Quote:
….1kiki
No, it's that you say one thing and do another. When Mal4 repeatedly posted 'facts' from Sky News (facts which were not found anywhere else) did you object? When Signy posted irrefitable videos from Odessa, did you accept them?

More of the same including a bait and switch. She suggests G says one thing and does another. This is what she does not G. The rest is subjective again. No information that suggests if G even responded to these posts. If he did we know 1kiki takes things out of context. So again without some sort of reference to refer to, just more useless information she will insist was not answer in her next post. Why Magon would anyone respond to it? It is to be ignored. Chris are you reading this? Do you get it?

Quote:
….1kiki
Your mistrust, which you claim to wield fairly, is exquisitely selective. If you agree with an item, you accept it whole cloth, source and facts be damned. If you have any kind of personal itch about an item - you don't like the facts or the source - no amount of validity will move you.

G being exquisitely selective about believing only what suits him should be recognized by all familiar with his posts as being not true. I would point out as well that if anyone here has an itch to scratch it is Sig and 1kiki. They keep starting threads trying to do just that. Scratch that itch.
You have been posting here for much longer than I Magon. You should recognize this as accurate.

Quote:
…kiki
Anyway, believe it or not, I have a life. And it doesn't include spending endless amounts of time on people who are so comfortable with their biases they don't even know they have them anymore.

And again, accusing others of what she has been shown to be. Falsely asserting she is right and moves on. Classic 1kiki, and that Magon is where (you're) focus should be. On the person, what is it they are doing and how are they doing it. If they did not have an agenda then a true discussion would ensue. With this one it is impossible.

SIGNYM

Saturday, August 16, 2014 7:19 AM

Quote:

Are you paying attention Magon? Taking what G says and adapting it as her own as though that is what she has always been about, even though "we" know this to be false.

Talking to yourself again?

--------------
THUGR is a know-nothing militarist.

SIGNYM

Saturday, August 16, 2014 7:27 AM

From the World Health Organization

http://www.who.int/csr/don/2014_08_08_ebola/en/

Reporting.....New
period .......Cases ....Deaths
AUG 12-13.....152 ......76
AUG 10-11 ....128 ......56
AUG 7-9 ......69........52
AUG 5-6 ......68 .......29
AUG 2-4 ......108 ......45
Jul 31-AUG 1..163.......61
JUL 24-27.....122.......57
JUL 21-23.....108.......12
JUL 18-20.....45........28

I can't correct the formatting, so I hope this is clear. It looks like the new cases dipped in early August but shot up again, almost matching the peak in late July.

--------------
THUGR is a know-nothing militarist.

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NEXT PAGE