So, when I hear Iraq is being taken over by I.S.I.S. ...
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Sunday, March 8, 2026 16:42
VIEWED: 15997
PAGE 11 of 15
The debate we had here was read by many. You forget that when you address me they are reading and vise versa. Let them decide. I don't expect them to weight in but I am good with leaving it at.....I made my point.
si shen
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"The debate we had here was read by many. You forget that when you address me they are reading and vise versa. Let them decide."
So, if everyone thinks the earth is flat does that make it true?
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If I look at 1,000 sources about a topic and because I am biased I chose to believe the one source that is propaganda. Then it doesn’t matter how many more sources I looked at then you. Especially if you chose to believe the 5 or 10 sources you checked that were correct does it?
That is what Signym does and then gets pissed off because we don’t understand. Look how many sources I checked she says, as though the amount of sources a person checks determines the facts.
si shen
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Okay, you kinda failed here. There.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
The debate we had here was read by many. You forget that when you address me they are reading and vise versa. Let them decide.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:Quote:Okay, you kinda failed here. There.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
The debate we had here was read by many. You forget that when you address me they are reading and vise versa. Let them decide.
I was speaking to those who could actually understand what they were reading precious. Try this;
I win, you lose.
Did you get that precious or should I explain it again?
si shen
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
One question answered:
http://rt.com/usa/167912-ica-mi6-isis-iraq/
'It fell on deaf ears': CIA and MI6 knew about ISIS assault in advance, failed to react
According to a report by the UK-based Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/10918607/How
-US-and-Britain-were-warned-of-Isis-advance-in-Iraq-but-turned-a-deaf-ear.html senior Kurdish intelligence officials said they tried to explain to their allies in the CIA, MI6, and the central Iraqi government that the members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) could represent a great threat to Iraq's stability, but that those warnings failed to spark any action.
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
I wonder - for all our spying and snooping into intl emails and telephony, did our intelligence agencies not see this coming?
And - hmmm. Very short-sighted to think that what happens in Iraq stays in Iraq. It's exactly that short-sighted thinking that had you shitting bricks on 9/11.
OONJERAH - We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live."
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
For what it's worth, Obama has now lately referred to the group as ISIS, instead of ISIL.
I know keeping up w/ groups and splinter groups and what they call themselves isn't always a clear cut matter. Minor detail, but Obama, more than any other , seems to excel in needlessly stepping out on his own, with nary an explanation.
He really does believe he's more extraordinary than virtually all other humans.
What a putz.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's the only I-rack to care about.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Sounds familiar, doesn't it? I was kinda wondering where MIKER and RAPPY went to.
I win. You lose
G
I don't consider ANY source to be "reliable". Heck, have you looked at zerohedge??? Every headline they post claims it's the end of something... the end of the dollar, the end of Iraq, the end of the banking system, the end of the world. I recommend it, and it's at the top of my list, not because it's reliable but because they're a terrific aggregator- they relay items from RT and WSJ and Reuters and Al Jazeera, and they do it fast.
I guess when it comes to news, I follow the House principle: Everybody lies. Or at least shades the truth. I kind of knew that Russia wasn't going to send in the troops to Ukraine when I saw the outrage kind of fade away from RT - no use getting people all riled up for nothing, no? Because then you have a PR problem to deal with! If I want to know about American outrages, I go to Global Research. See how that works? Different sources are good for different things, including a window on what the administration in another nation is planning on doing. If I see the outrage factor building up on RT again, I'll start to worry.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME