Real World Event Discussions

Questions that conservatives can't answer

POSTED BY: kpo
UPDATED: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 23:15
VIEWED: 19339
PAGE 12 of 16

Saturday, October 4, 2014 5:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I have yet to get an explanation of what "libertarianism" is, altho I'm being berated for trying to "run away from" understanding it.


Breaking News: wikipedia does currently have a definition of libertarianism, AKA an explanation. Whether or not you can understand it remains to be seen.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, October 4, 2014 5:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Well, let's see.

I don't think anyone has ever come up with a LOGICAL reason for anyone saying someone "needs to get laid" that makes any sense, except that it is a sexist put-down. Nobody ever NEEDS to get laid, and saying that has no logical connection to any argument or debate.

As to race relations, of COURSE they've worsened since Obama was elected. This flies in the face of everything racists believe; that even a HALF African-American could ever rise to that kind of power is something unheard of in their world view, so of course it's brought out the worst in them. I didn't read the thread--I'm skipping quite a few these days, they're self-explanatory by title alone--but if he did claim it was a "have you stopped beating your wife" question, then see above. It is not a response, it's a dodge.

As to libertarianism, I knew little about it before I came here. After people here saying they were libertarian, I tried to educate myself on it. It appears that, much like religion, it's something that is defined one way, believed another, and practiced in yet another some people. I see little connection to what it's defined as and what those kinds of people use it to argue from.

You'll never get any answers on any of those three, in my opinion. They are things which those questioned don't WANT to answer, because there is no logical answer, so all you'll ever get are dodges. I'd love to be proven wrong, but I'm not holding my breath.



Apparently defying the thread title, here seem to be a pile of answers. What escuses will be claimed as to why these don't count?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, October 4, 2014 6:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:

Auraptor can't answer what 'terrorist' acts Mandela committed that had him put in prison.


It's not personal. It's just war.


You should try wikipedia, although we are not surprised you are incapable of mastering things like search engines on the interwebs.
I suppose you think wikipedia is conservative, eh? Or maybe your definition of terrorist is surprisingly akin to libtard hero?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, October 4, 2014 6:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BIGDAMNNOBODY:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
It's okay, we know you can't muster the courage to answer any of these. We know all you're capable of is snark. Poor wittle wingnut.


I reject the premise of this thread. This is nothing more than a "prettied up" attack thread IMHO.
And what makes you think you are somehow deserving of answers?


How true. But I missed out on it when it was the rage among libtards.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, October 4, 2014 6:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
I would welcome one. And I certainly wouldn't take it as an 'attack thread'.

It's not personal. It's just war.


Shirley you jest!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, October 4, 2014 6:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:

Geezer can't back up his claim that the CBO were behind Obama's ARRA stimulus package (and that the IMF were behind Japan's recent economic policy) and so their analysis on the subject can't be trusted

Geezer also can't answer this: "Got any answer to the mountain of evidence of governments cutting back on spending during downturns, and hurting growth?"



It's not personal. It's just war.


Your obvious defective logic of dreaming that the parasitic government increasing spending of tax dollars would somehow equate to growth of that which is being sucked dry effectively leaves this "question" meritless.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, October 4, 2014 6:13 AM

Well, that seems to wrap up the bogus claims of the title of this thread.

Big whopping Zero.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

KPO
Saturday, October 4, 2014 6:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:

Auraptor can't answer what 'terrorist' acts Mandela committed that had him put in prison.


It's not personal. It's just war.


You should try wikipedia, although we are not surprised you are incapable of mastering things like search engines on the interwebs.
I suppose you think wikipedia is conservative, eh? Or maybe your definition of terrorist is surprisingly akin to libtard hero?


Auraptor couldn't answer the question, hence its presence in this thread. Feel free to answer for him if you can...

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, October 5, 2014 1:04 AM

So it looks like libtards here cannot come up with questions that conservatives can't answer.

Zip.

Their self-delusions seem relegated to "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" and their demands that we PROVE their fantasy theories like the Earth is Flat, the Water is White, Facts have a Libtard bias, and other nonsense.

Not really as entertaining as I had hoped.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

KPO
Sunday, October 5, 2014 1:11 AM


Upon invitation, JSF cannot answer the question originally directed to Auraptor, about what 'terrorist acts' Mandela committed that had him thrown in prison.


It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME