Britain bans juries, Star Chamber keeps defense names secret

POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Monday, June 22, 2009 18:15
VIEWED: 1075
PAGE 1 of 1

PIRATENEWS

Friday, June 19, 2009 3:31 PM

Court allows first juryless criminal trial
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jun/18/criminal-trial-without-jury

Brit cops taser and beat man motionless in street
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1193174/A-suspect-tasered-times-polic
e-punched-New-York-No-streets-Nottingham.html

CITIZEN

Friday, June 19, 2009 4:15 PM

Well, yeah but if the guys hadn't tried to pervert the course of justice by continually trying to bribe the jury, they'd have had their trial by jury already. In fact they've had three, but they kept bribing the jury, so the case kept having to be retried. Clearly they didn't want a fair trial by jury, so they're not getting one, they should be happy, they're getting what they wanted.

PEACEKEEPER

Sunday, June 21, 2009 9:28 PM

Te video----agreed.Totally out of order.But this shit happens all over the planet.It has fuck all to do with being British!!!

PIRATENEWS

Monday, June 22, 2009 4:19 AM

Prosecutors and judges always bribe and extort juries.

Britian used to jail all juries until they reached the "correct" verdict.

The British Empire did the same in USA, until their judges and soldiers got the death penalty in the Revolution.

This new trial is the return of Star Chambers. Just like Gitmo.

CITIZEN

Monday, June 22, 2009 6:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by piratenews:
Britian used to jail all juries until they reached the "correct" verdict.

Juries still are sequestered, but not for trials that might take six months. Why should jurors be taken out of their lives for half a year because some arseholes don't want a fair trial for themselves?