General Discussions

Male and Female Imponderables--Yet Again

POSTED BY: Tristan
UPDATED: Thursday, June 15, 2006 20:08
VIEWED: 16927
PAGE 19 of 23

Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:32 PM

Oh, I've managed to find other erogenous zones on menfolk! Certainly not as major, but they do exist. Like you said, exploring is at least half the fun!

*snort* Poppycock... Didn't even think of that. I must be tired.
Oh, and I forgot to mention; talked to my mom about it, and she said she didn't have it done on my brother. And he's just fine, from everything I hear from him. I mean, he had a serious case of poison oak awhile ago, but that's hardly related is it?

How do the men here feel about the issue?

**********************************

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:32 PM

As a male, this is what I know about circumcision:
It was originally done for hygenic purposes. However, the introduction of soap and education on how to keep the body clean led to it no longer being necessary. Nowadays, it's done because "we've always done it"...tradition.
I have also learned that the uncircumcised male has something like 75% more feeling on the sensitive parts of the penis than the circumcised male. I have been circumcised, so I know not what I am missing...but here's a quandry for you females to think on. A regular, circumcised male's penis is already very sensitive; it's why we can still acheive orgasm. Now, I have always heard general complaints from the female portion of our species along the lines of "he never lasts long enough"...so, imagine a quick-shot male you have been with...and then imagine him with a 75% increase in feeling. How long you think he's gonna last now?


____________

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:38 PM

You obviously have your opinion about it, but I don't think it should be done unless absolutely necessary. Saying it's more barbaric to have it done to a five year old than to a baby has no logic behind it. It hurts no matter when it's done. And maybe - just maybe - that doctor had a reason to refuse; maybe he'd done his research!

**********************************

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:40 PM

Good morning and good topic! I'll a little oral with my coffe and doughnut...

Oddly, I have never been with a man who didn't just sidle on down the bed with being prompted. Guess I've been lucky, huh? I must admit, I've always thought a little odd - the idea of doing that is what convinces that I could never be a lesbian. just... ick.

As for me reciprocating - the act itself, okay maybe not always the funnest. But making a man get all melty and crazy - very good, worth the effort and any unpleasantness. I do enjoy that lots. Absolutely must be my choice though. Hands pushing or holding - no way.

I want to hear more men state opinions! I had one boyfriend tell me he didn't enjoy the act so much as the woman's desire to do it for him. I thought that was kind of sweet.

Circumcision? Don't really have an opinion.

-----------------------------------------------
I'm the president. I don't need to listen.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tristan:
As a male, this is what I know about circumcision:
It was originally done for hygenic purposes. However, the introduction of soap and education on how to keep the body clean led to it no longer being necessary. Nowadays, it's done because "we've always done it"...tradition.
I have also learned that the uncircumcised male has something like 75% more feeling on the sensitive parts of the penis than the circumcised male. I have been circumcised, so I know not what I am missing...but here's a quandry for you females to think on. A regular, circumcised male's penis is already very sensitive; it's why we can still acheive orgasm. Now, I have always heard general complaints from the female portion of our species along the lines of "he never lasts long enough"...so, imagine a quick-shot male you have been with...and then imagine him with a 75% increase in feeling. How long you think he's gonna last now?



I've actually heard that, while the head is more sensitive and such, men with foreskins actually tend to last longer! No first-hand experience, though. Plus, I've basically never had that complaint; too long and I start to feel raw and hurty. Most of my pleasure is in all the foreplay anyway; the intercourse is almost pure icing on the cake.


**********************************

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:50 PM

OK, caught up on the circumcision posts... I have to say, anything that removes sensitivity is just wrong! I'm with PhoenixRose on the timing issues too.

-----------------------------------------------
I'm the president. I don't need to listen.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mal4prez:
Oddly, I have never been with a man who didn't just sidle on down the bed with being prompted. Guess I've been lucky, huh?


I'LL say!
I don't think it's at all ick. More proof that I'm a true bisexual!
Yeah, it's nice to make a man go all melty. Fortunately, I've been able to do that pretty effectively without spraining my jaw

**********************************

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:54 PM

PR, the foreskin actually covers the head (you know this), but during errection, the skin is stretched, revealing the sensitive head...so, the sensitive part is all exposed. I also have no first hand experience, just research to fall back on. If there were a way to keep the foreskin over the head (though why you'd want to do that I don't know), I suppose they may last longer.



____________

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:56 PM

Yeah, I figured out how it worked. I'm not sure why it is, it's just what I've heard. Might be because of the "gliding" action from the foreskin. I have no idea. I'll have to read some stuff and see where I saw that.

*Edit* No, circumcision can make you last longer, I guess. Like I said, though, that is not personally important to me. More than 10-20 minutes and I'm starting to feel like I have friction burns.

**********************************

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:18 PM

10-20 minutes...of straight bumpity-bump? Damn, maybe when I was 20...now, it's a matter of trying to do quantum physics in my head and hoping she finishes before I do...I hate getting old...


____________

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME