Real World Event Discussions

Should Muslims pay for Mohammed cartoon festivals?

POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Monday, September 29, 2025 15:54
VIEWED: 5193
PAGE 1 of 3

Monday, May 11, 2015 2:32 AM

I heard a good point last week, following the Garland TX shooting at the Prophet Cartoon contest.

Libtards insist that Christians and other religious citizens pay for an abominable practice which their religion abhors - abortion.
So if Muslims feel their religion prohibits depictions of Mohammed, should not the Libtards also logically require that these festivals be funded by the Muslims who reject the practice on religious grounds?

Or are "logical" and "Libtard" in the same sentence going just too far?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, May 11, 2015 3:42 AM

Free Speech is great, but if it motivates others to kill you, remember that sometimes discretion is the better part of valor.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, May 11, 2015 9:17 AM

" Stay the hell out of my womb while I reach into your pocket and fund my abortion! It's my RIGHT !!



But making cartoons of Mohammed is disgusting ! "

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, May 11, 2015 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Stay the hell out of my womb while I reach into your pocket and fund my abortion! It's my RIGHT !!


The govt. reaches into our pockets to fund everything, no matter the degree of absurdity of what it is spent on ... like oil co. subsidies, farm subsidies, shrimp on treadmills, sex habits of earthworms, bridges to nowhere, foreign aid, green energy fiascoes, etc., etc. Seems like paying for poor women'a abortions is very far from the most objectionable use of tax dollars.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, May 11, 2015 10:27 AM

Quote:

But making cartoons of Mohammed is disgusting !

It's just dumb.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 12, 2015 3:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Stay the hell out of my womb while I reach into your pocket and fund my abortion! It's my RIGHT !!


The govt. reaches into our pockets to fund everything, no matter the degree of absurdity of what it is spent on ... like oil co. subsidies, farm subsidies, shrimp on treadmills, sex habits of earthworms, bridges to nowhere, foreign aid, green energy fiascoes, etc., etc. Seems like paying for poor women'a abortions is very far from the most objectionable use of tax dollars.



Poor women, rich women, abortion or birth control pills, is that the measure we're going by now ? There's a lot else that's wrong, so we'll let this slide because it doesn't equal the financial cost of the other stuff ? What about the social cost ? Of teaching folks that actions don't have consequences, and that people don't have to be responsible for the choices they've made ?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Stay the hell out of my womb while I reach into your pocket and fund my abortion! It's my RIGHT !!


The govt. reaches into our pockets to fund everything, no matter the degree of absurdity of what it is spent on ... like oil co. subsidies, farm subsidies, shrimp on treadmills, sex habits of earthworms, bridges to nowhere, foreign aid, green energy fiascoes, etc., etc. Seems like paying for poor women'a abortions is very far from the most objectionable use of tax dollars.


Not talking about tax dollars. Talking about religious followers, including churches, being forced to fund, pay for abortions as part of government mandated ObamaCare.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 12, 2015 6:42 AM

Ruling in the Hobby Lobby case, the Supreme Court upheld religious exemptions to Obamacare mandates.
http://www.hobbylobbycase.com/

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Ruling in the Hobby Lobby case, the Supreme Court upheld religious exemptions to Obamacare mandates.
http://www.hobbylobbycase.com/



Yeah, and so ?

Why did it take a trip to the USSC for that to happen?

It was needed because this President and his party are committed socialists, " Everybody in, nobody out " and they despise freedom and dissent.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, May 13, 2015 4:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Ruling in the Hobby Lobby case, the Supreme Court upheld religious exemptions to Obamacare mandates.
http://www.hobbylobbycase.com/


In the OP, I referred to the Libtards, not the reasonable people you linked to.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME