Cinescape: WB wants Angel back

POSTED BY: Succatash
UPDATED: Saturday, November 20, 2004 23:16
VIEWED: 6326
PAGE 1 of 2

1 2 NEXT PAGE

SUCCATASH

Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:37 PM

SCOOP: WB TV wants more ANGEL...but will they get it?

October 20, 2004
http://www.cinescape.com/0/editorial.asp?aff_id=0&this_cat=Television&
action=page&type_id=&cat_id=270355&obj_id=42759

"According to our anonymous source, new WB Network Chairman Garth Ancier has spoken with Joss Whedon about doing "something" with ANGEL, be it a series of spinoff movies or -- hold your horses -- bringing the show back. Whoa."

"Gott kann dich nicht vor mir beschuetzen, weil ich nicht boese bin."

ZEEK

Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:44 PM

Now that's a good way to brighten a guy's day.

Hope is always a great thing to have. Please post again if you hear anything new on this one.

ERELLEVENT

Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:58 PM

I thought there was a very slim chance this might be ture till i got to the part where it said they would recast David Boreanaz if he wouldn't want to do it. Come on that is the stupidest thing i have heard, yeah they will recast the roll of angel for one more season of a show they already canceled lmao.

RHYMEPHILE

Wednesday, October 20, 2004 7:11 PM

I think the most likely outcome would be a TV movie of one of the other characters on Angel. That would be fine, because Mr. Boreanaz seems tired of the character of Angel from what I've read. It's too bad, but I guess he'd rather take the chance with trying to get into movies than be wrapped up again with the series. It's understandable that he wants to move on, but I don't have to like it. Sigh.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"My office! Burgled! Plundered! Purloined! Ha ha ha...loins."

-- Phil Sebben, Harvey Birdman: Attorney at Law

GROUNDED

Wednesday, October 20, 2004 8:05 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by erellevent:
I thought there was a very slim chance this might be ture till i got to the part where it said they would recast David Boreanaz if he wouldn't want to do it. Come on that is the stupidest thing i have heard, yeah they will recast the roll of angel for one more season of a show they already canceled lmao.

That line was quite clearly in jest.

As for a resurrection - I wouldn't get my hopes up. A new show featuring characters from Angel besides Angel himself is far more likely given the tone of various post-Angel DB interviews.

JEBBYPAL

Wednesday, October 20, 2004 10:35 PM

Angel smangel. Lorne survived the final battle, let's have an all lorne show.

The Strawberry Monkey who defends tight pants everywhere!

JEWEL

Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:20 PM

As much as I would like to believe it, my skeptic nature tells me to not to get my hopes up over a rumor. I can't think of many things I'd love more, though, than more Angel.

ANOTHERFIREFLYFAN

Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:27 AM

I can't wait for the article about Fox wanting Firefly back. ;-)

(Course, it would be better to have it on another channel.)

Keep flying

DANFAN

Friday, October 22, 2004 3:15 AM

My sense of justice utterly rebels at the thought of Universal rolling the dice to expand Firefly's audience and then Fox reaping ANY benefits from Universal's wisdom.

It would be a bittersweet pill to have to return to Fox to see new episodes of Firefly. But still, plenty sweet enough to swallow...

GINOBIFFARONI

Friday, October 22, 2004 3:35 AM

An even edger Spike fighting the fight in the streets of London, joined infrequently by the Ripper himself...

" Don't Blame Me I Voted For Kudos "

1 2 NEXT PAGE