Another Unarmed Black Teen Killed
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 25, 2026 18:50
VIEWED: 62340
PAGE 29 of 57
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
get with the program here.
"Ya, zat's right! Follow ze orders given by der Fuhrer JSF here. Ve haf vays uf dealing vith people like YOU."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
BCoat
You’re kidding right, you're concerned I misspelled a word? Stay on track. There are two competing realities here. Part of the problem in dealing with this type of situation, is separating out how people perceive it. The African American community see four hundred years of oppression behind each of these type incidents. They are left feeling as though they do not matter to the country as a whole. To them the cop was guilty before he fired his gun.
The other side, or reality of the situation are the facts of the case. This cop may have been justified in feeling he was in a life threatening situation. I don’t know yet. In these threads it really does not matter. What has mattered throughout to some is jumping on the band wagon. To wage a war against what they perceive as an injustice practiced exclusively by the white community. Well, no one is denying the plight of the African American community for 400 years in this country. Yet to suggest that it has not led to the creation of dysfunctional black communities across this nation, has been and continues to be detrimental to solving the problems that need resolving.
I thought blacks represented 19% of the country’s population. It may be closer to 13% I am not sure. Yet they represent 50% of the people convicted for murder. Over 90% of blacks who are killed, are killed by other blacks. What happened in Ferguson will be found out. It will not change the fact that the root of the problem resides within the black community itself. It is cultural and nothing will change without many more coming to terms with that. Many more meaning the black community itself.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:
Originally posted by oldenglanddry:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/18/hedy-epstein-arrested-ferguso
n-holocaust-_n_5689822.html
About as easy a collar as the cops could hope for.
Short of shooting her in the back of the head you mean?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You ever look in the mirror?
With NOBC, or course, it's already settled:
the unarmed, compliant, unassuming, law-
abiding, non-drugged, innocent, non-thieving,
meek, running away child was absolutely,
beyond any reasonable doubt, Innocent.
No need to confuse the issue with facts,
those darn inconvenient things.
And YOU are a lying sack of Gose.
You infer those things, maybe. But quote me
where I wrote them. C'mon. "Bring it, ya
fucking animal." Bring it on.
I posted the link to the conservative blog
about Brown's hip hop/rap ambitions. I posted
about the fact that he had marijuana in his
system. I'm posting documented sources for the conservative argument, AREN"T I?
You're one of those Tea Party folks, aren't
you? Proud of that fact, aren't you? Believe
in the Constitution, don't you? And in the
Bill of Rights, don't you?Or maybe only the Second one, the one about YOUR right to own a gun and scare folks at Starbucks.
I believe in the Fifth and Sixth AMendments, the ones about being innocent until proven guilty in a court of law; and the one about not being deprived of life liberty or property without due process of law.
HOw do YOU feel about those two? Maybe rights only count if they're yours, not if some racial inferior of yours wants to claim them.
I'm ready for your response, the one about, "that's not what the Founders meant about those two amendments."
If you need me to. I can provide documentation about those amendments, not just "anecdotal evidencee."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Just ask Trader Joe's. They must keep their fellow blacks subjugated and penned in the poor neighborhoods to maintain their lifestyle of wealth from race-baiting. This is why they insist upon keeping the jobs out of the areas, and looting, rioting, and burning any business (AKA employer) that dares to defy them.
Trader Joe's did that? ANd you can document that? Or is it 'anecdotal evidence"?
Or maybe you are referring to Jesse and AL? In that case , LEARN TO WRITE A COHERENT PARAGRAPH. I learned that in a PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL? Maybe they didn't cover that before you dropped out.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
The Chief or whomever, stated the first part of the above, specifically in reference to a FOI request, which is usually handled (at the direction of some lawyer, like a Prosecuting Attorney) in the most non-effusive way, so as not to reveal too much of the case.
OH, yeah , the most non-effusive way? Like at a TV press conference.... usually
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by NewOldBrownCoat:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
I am not saying the cops are not overstepping their authority. What I am saying is that the press know exactly how to go about getting themselves arrested.
for accuracy, I snipped some here. Irrelevant stuff-- NOBC
What he did was so obvious it was an are you kidding me moment.
And these professional police officers aren't trained to recognize provocation by people they encounter? Especially obvious provocation? And aren't trained in how to deal with unco-operative citizens who are asserting their own personal constitutional rights? And aren't taught the legal limits on their (police officers') power and authority?
Oh, yeah, I forgot-- this IS in Ferguson Missouri. They are taught how to do that stuff down there... Beat 'em with your nightstick. Gas 'em. SHOOT 'em. Handcuff 'em and arrest 'em, and then haul 'em to the station. Where their superiors, who ARE BETTER trained, dismiss the charges and let 'em go, because they know about the court rulings that say that police officers DON'T have the right to do that. And because the superiors know about the lawsuits that will be filed, and won, and upheld, because those are settled matters of legal precedent; and know about how much those lawsuits WILL COST, in fighting , and after they're lost, in settlement payouts.
Yes they see it for what it is. Does that mean they let the person stay in a restaurant they are trying to close? Or continue to be belligerent? Or do they take him out forcible, meaning under arrest? What they do is arrest the person. Then the next day watch how they denied the reporter or whomever their rights plastered all over the news. Watch how they are portrayed as out of control. Which is exactly what the reporter did. Whenever a reporter becomes the story, 99% of the time it is lousy reporting from lousy reporter.
It is about sectionalism. A tendency to be more concerned with the interests of your particular group or region than with the problems and interests of the larger group, country, etc. In other words, stirring up the pot to gain ratings. Things are bad enough without creating false images due to your own behavior while reporting the news.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
BCoat
You’re kidding right, you're concerned I misspelled a word?
Congradulations. You got through a complete post without any spelling errors I could find. Now, punctuation and verb use errors-- I can show you the ones you made in that post, if you want to learn about them.
They undercut the inteligence of your arguments, made YOU look ignorant, or uneducated ( stupid, dumb-- if you need small words) to an educated person. They suggest that any argument you may make is uneducated.
Hey, I made a spelling error in this post. I cuaght it myself, I did it on porpose. I report it here. Consider it a test-- can you find it without using a spell checker? How much help do you need? How many of your buddies will it take to recconize it?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Since I have not been impressed with your being able to sort through the issues in this thread in an objective manner, I will forgo the lesson you offer and instead suggest to you that you try and think things through before you post. I would rather be able to understand an issue than spell it.
As others here love to say, ad hom....posting on your part.
Besides, correcting my spelling is MAGONDAUGHTERS job.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
At that point in time, the facts of Michael Brown also being a habitual criminal,
ANd you can document that statement, of course? The "habitual " part? Is that something you heard on Hannity? Or maybe "anecdotal"?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME