Another Unarmed Black Teen Killed
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 25, 2026 18:50
VIEWED: 62340
PAGE 24 of 57
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
All the witnesses said the cop shot him in the back. How is it all the witness saw him shot in the back?
They didn't. They were LYING.
I heard one girl swear that Brown wasn't wearing the same clothes as he was in the video, and that the cops had " photo shopped " the video.
Now hold up a sec. Why would the cops go to all the trouble of photo shopping a security cam video ( I guess they have Industrial Light and Magic talent down at the Ferguson P.D., huh ?) and not have him wearing the same clothes as when he was shot, just a few minutes later. Even though the lawyer for the accomplice admits that the 2 in the video cam were in fact his client and the deceased.
Also, there was a guy caught on a cell phone video, after the shooting, saying that M.B. actually came BACK and was charging the officer. It was a casual conversation, caught on audio, shortly after the shooting, but before all the ruckus had taken place.
I'm telling you, the agents of deception and chaos are working over time on this, as they ALWAYS do to promote a certain agenda. Never mind the actual facts.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Were any cigars found?
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Were any cigars found?
OMG ! Nancy Drew, you've done it ! You've cracked the case !!!
Never mind that lawyer for the accomplice has already identified both males as being the ones who were in the store, and robbed ( he corrected himself and said - TOOK ) the cigars.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/08/15/Lawyer-Confirms-Brown
-Took-Cigars-From-Store
Good grief.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
All the witnesses said the cop shot him in the back. How is it all the witness saw him shot in the back?
Cites?
You claim *ALL* the witnesses said this. Prove it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And we're supposed to buy that shit from Breitbart, the same shitheads who posted a pic of a protestor throwing a tear gas grenade BACK at the cops while insisting it was a fuckin molotov ?
Riiiiight.
And apparently you missed EC's relevant post earlier, with cite from CCNews.
http://countercurrentnews.com/2014/08/ferguson-store-owner-says-he-doe
snt-believe-thats-mike-brown-on-surveillance-video/
Quote:
The surveillance tapes supposedly shows Michael Brown “robbing” a Ferguson convenience store market. But in spite of the fact that the “robbery” was carried out without the brandishing of a weapon, and in spite of the fact that this was really more a case of petty theft shoplifting, this Friday, for the first time, the owners of the store have said that they never said they believed Michael Brown was the individual who stole the item from their store.
In fact, while the owners are speaking out through an attorney about the surveillance video, the mainstream, corporate media are largely ignoring everything they said, pretending that this video definitively identifies Michael Brown as the strong arm shoplifter.
The owners claim that this is a claim the police have come up with on their own. For his part, Dorian Johnson, a witness to the shooting of Michael Brown, has reportedly confessed to being with Brown in the convenient store. But for now, that has not been corroborated by the store owner, employees or eye witnesses. As well, we are not hearing this from Johnson himself, so a number of questions remain.
Through their attorney, the owner of the store also even dispute the claim that they or an employee called 911. They say that a customer inside the store made the call. This is pretty strange if this was indeed a “robbery”.
As well, in addition to clarifying that they never said they believed, nor identified the suspect with Michael Brown, they claimed that the St. Louis County issued the warrants for the hard drive of surveillance video Friday, based on the police claiming that Brown fit the description of the person in the video… the person who the owners and employees of the store were not even going to call the police on. Again, the owner clarifies that neither the management, nor any employee ever identified Brown as the suspect in that video.
They simply never said they believed that, this was a claim made by the police alone. So the real question is why the media has been taking the word of the police on this matter, even over the word of the eye witnesses and the store owner?
Chances are it's a deliberate, out of context clip of a personal issue which simply happened to occur in the store, used in an attempt to bias the public, media and potential jury pool - typical police SOP for these kind of situations, and we're all well aware of it.
As for events on the ground, the dedicated "press area" (See Also: Free Speech Zone) was set up 2.5 MILES from the action initially, and police were giving the press conflicting directions to confuse them and send them on wild goose chases.
Unusually for a situation like this I can confirm the police forces WERE actually taking some return fire, most of it from long range but it was definately present, which TOTALLY freaked out the police, guess they weren't expecting *that*, although given the level of provocation and pressure they should have been.
Here's some raw coverage from VICE news.
What, they thought they could infinitely abuse an entire neighborhood and NOT get shot at ?
-Frem
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The autopsy doctor found it inconclusive.
At this point, what the hell difference does it make?
The kid got shot 6 times - twice in the head - WTF was that cop thinking?
There is no crime in the world that could warrant being shot 6 times - not jaywalking, not shoplifting a handful of cigarillos.
Forget all the riots, which, by the way, speaks to a systematic ill treatment of a particular group of people. Forget the politics, police reports, jurisdiction, Civil rights and poverty......................
The boy was shot 6 times after putting his hands up in surrender.
That's seriously sick in the grand scheme of things. That is beyond excessive force, it is de-humanizing in every sense of the word.
What was the mental state of the officer who shot another human 6 times?
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Autopsey out. Brown not shot in the back.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Chances are it's a deliberate, out of context clip of a personal issue which simply happened to occur in the store ...
I watched the video. Brown asks someone out of camera range behind the counter for some items. Some are handed to him and he hands them to his friend to hold. He talks with the person behind the counter some more and after a time the person behind the counter hands him some items, which Brown holds. After some more conversation Brown hands them back to the person behind the counter, gestures to his friend and gets those items as well and hands them back. All of this is on camera. The next thing you see is Brown and his friend walking toward the camera and picking something up off the floor outside of camera range.
What did the store person do - throw the cigars at them out of camera range in ill temper? it sure looks that way to me. Up until that point, all of the cigars are visibly accounted for and behind the counter.
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
At this point, what the hell difference does it make?
The kid got shot 6 times - twice in the head - WTF was that cop thinking?
There is no crime in the world that could warrant being shot 6 times - not jaywalking, not shoplifting a handful of cigarillos.
A struggle for the cop's gun might.
Also...
Quote:
And we're supposed to buy that shit from Breitbart, the same shitheads who posted a pic of a protestor throwing a tear gas grenade BACK at the cops while insisting it was a fuckin molotov ?
Riiiiight.
And apparently you missed EC's relevant post earlier, with cite from CCNews.
You dismiss Breitbart, but then go on to cite CCN ? ROFLMAO !!!!
Man, talk about being a total conspiracy nutjob !
I doubt very much there was any " insisting " of anything, as you claim. Molotov cocktails were thrown. If some intern misidentified an object being thrown in a photo, does that mean the event didn't take place ?
Who the hell is CCN ? One of PN's rivals ?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Tox results still have to come in too
Just saw a reference to that. (Oops, better provide a link.) He is reported to have had marijuana in his system. We all know how that stuff turns people into crazed invulnerable killers. 'Specially members of the "black community." White folks it just causes cravings for pizza and Snickers bars.
Also saw a (conservative) website (Damn, I'm gonna have to go back and FIND the site again, and provide a link. YA know how some people just hate "anecdotal evidence". But I did see it. ) that reported several things I hadn't seen anywhere else: Brown wanted to be, or was, a rapper. We all know that EVERY SINGLE ONE of THEM is a criminal; there's video of him flashing "gang signs". That one might be true, actually; and, (same site) a motivation for stealing the box of cigars, worth almost $50-- that's 80 to 100 of 'em. Turns out drug dealers hollow out those Swisher Sweets and refill them with MJ. (I hadn't known that.) So he was, "really", a "drug dealer", not a good kid going off to college. High level, too, probably a wholesaler.
Now, I don't know. Are those true, relevant facts about his real character, or just more character assassination? And is any of it relevant to the police officer's original action, stopping these 2 guys for walking down the middle of a street? Did he, or the police chief, know about any of those things? Back later with links.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
officer recognized stolen items after stopping the kid.
saw The Rap mention that one.
Haven't seen that item ANYWHERE ELSE, and I've been looking for it. I'd REALLY like to verify that. Don't suppose you have a source for that item of "anecdotal evidence? And how does that square with the PD Chief himself saying that the officer did not know about the reported crime at the liquor store?
Did this cop just get an ESP flash--"Hey, those cigars look just like the ones in the crime report I'm gonna get in a few minutes." Temporal telekinesis, a new police tool...?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME