My thoughts on the Middel East

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
It's not true.

---

Simply find a quote from a reasonably reputable source stating that our troops would have been under U.S. laws whist staying & prove your point then.


But you can't.

---

It's called going to bat for what is right. Many in Iraq wanted us there, many did not. Obama never wanted us there, and summarily got us the hell out, which resulted in ISIS waltzing in , just like they did.

See above link. Question already answered.

---

All the Iraqis had to was sign, they said no rap it's that simple. You can blame the President it's your right, but you are still wrong.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

CHRISISALL

Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:17 AM

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

And per Iraq, Obama didn't WANT an agreement. That's the point you're missing. He wanted out, entirely.

---

Doesn't matter, that's not the issue, except in you own little mind.

Sorry, try again. This has been debunked. Once again, you are demonstrably in error, and ensconced in the endless anti-whom-you-hate bullshit. Feel free to go on, and prove yourself more the idiot than you have already (Heh, if that's even possible at this point).
You proved me right here.
Thanks.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Hillary wanted us to go into Iraq in the first place. The colossal mistake that started this. I would say to Hillary what Bill Clinton said about the gripes of Cheney and Obama not working hard enough to clean up his mess. Hillary is running for President and she sees which way the wind is blowing. She better hope in two years she is not defending herself again about saying what she is saying now. So far Joe Biden is the one who called it right.

---

Also wanted to add...

NBC’s David Gregory had some unpredictably harsh words for the White House during an interview with Senator Dick Durbin on Sunday, noting that “a big, expansive terrorist threat that has amassed” under President Obama’s watch.

The “Meet the Press” host spoke with the Illinois Democrat over the limited air campaign ordered by the president to blunt the advance of ultra-violent jihadists in northern Iraq. Gregory requested the senator’s insight as to how the United States found itself again involved in the region.

“Is the problem that the Obama administration — wanting to be something other than President Bush – got out of the business of confronting terrorism on a big, global scale and just dealt with it in a more limited way?” he asked. “Is it an underreaction to the terrorist threat?”

Durbin tried to steer the conversation specifically back to Iraq, but Gregory cut him off. ”I’m talking about the terrorist threat!” he said. “I’m talking about fighting terrorism.”


“The Obama team said, ‘We are not in the business of a global fight against terror, we’re fighting al-Qaida in limited forms,” the NBC host continued. “This is a big, expansive terrorist threat that has amassed on his watch.”

http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/10/david-gregory-slams-obama-big-expans
ive-terrorist-threat-amassed-on-his-watch/#ixzz3A7mhv6Al

And this gem...

Top NBC reporters Chuck Todd and Andrea Mitchell turned on President Obama over his excuses for Iraq’s unravelling on Sunday, with Todd claiming he never tried to secure a 2011 troop agreement with the Iraqi government and Mitchell calling the White House’s bad intelligence excuse “a farce.”

The pair unloaded on the Obama administration during Sunday’s “Meet the Press,” calling it aimless and needling its excuses for the sudden surge of ultra-violent jihadis in northern Iraq.

As American bombs again fall on that country, President Obama responded to criticism that we should have left troops inside Iraq after 2011 by claiming the Iraqi government pushed the U.S. out.

“But, this president ideologically did not want to use more influence to –” host David Gregory began.

“Look, this was not an administration that was eager to tell [Iraqi Prime Minister] Maliki, ‘Oh, you don’t want a status-of-forces agreement?’” Todd agreed, explaining how the White House failed to pursue any agreement that would have left a stabilizing force.

“I’ve been trying to figure out this man’s doctrine now for six years,” Todd continued. “He doesn’t have one . . . He pushes and pulls between the idea of democracy first and stability first . . . Now he’s trying for stability first, and I think in this case he’s struggling.”


http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/10/nbcs-todd-mitchell-sour-on-obama-ove
r-iraq-excuses-a-farce/#ixzz3A7nCs1fS




Ever Obama's biggest fans , now we see even THEY are starting to see the Emperor has nothing on.

Took 'em long enough.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Rappy this last post by you is a good post. I have to go out but will address it in about an hour or so. Hope you check back.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

And per Iraq, Obama didn't WANT an agreement. That's the point you're missing. He wanted out, entirely.

---

Doesn't matter, that's not the issue, except in you own little mind.

---

Me and TEA PARTY fan David Gregory, huh?


You're such a boob.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Well, you've outed yourself AGAIN, Rappy, Good Job!

PROTip: Timestamps!
A little patience goes a long way!

-Frem

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME