Presidential lies
POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Friday, August 29, 2025 15:06
VIEWED: 27467
PAGE 5 of 24
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:Quote:This is accurate if memory serves.
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Nixon was NOT impeached. The House Judiciary Committee only prepared Articles of Impeachment.
Awww Man. I find Chrisisall correct twice in one week? What next.
Miker:
Nixon was never Impeached.
Only the House can Impeach.
The Senate cannot Impeach.
The Senate can Try after an Impeachment.
The Senate cannot Try until after an Impeachment.
Only the 17th and 42nd Presidents were impeached. Nixon is neither, he was 37th.
A Committee voting to proceed with an Impeachment vote by the full House is not the same thing as being Impeached.
I can write down that Obama is found Impeached, but that has already been done by far smarter folks than I, and it would still not mean that Obama was Impeached, no matter how much it is deserved.
Sorry you are confused by your ignorance. My attempts to correct your errors could be construed as opportunity for you to learn from your mistakes, but we see that is not in the cards for you.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Cats and dogs, living together...
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Awww Man. I find Chrisisall correct twice in one week? What next.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:Quote:Cats and dogs, living together...
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Awww Man. I find Chrisisall correct twice in one week? What next.
Who ya gonna call?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I also meant to point out that yes, truth, facts, and reality can be rude very often. This is true. One could also postulate that repeatedly mentioning lies, fibs, falsehoods, and continuing to repeat them after being provided with correction is also rude. It could be conjured that repeatedly telling lies is perhaps more rude than trying to assist the liar by providing correction in terms of displaying the facts, truth, and reality.
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:Quote:Cats and dogs, living together...
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Awww Man. I find Chrisisall correct twice in one week? What next.
Gays drafted in the NFL (OK, with only 6 picks remaining til the end, but still.)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by MIKER:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:Quote:This is accurate if memory serves.
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Nixon was NOT impeached. The House Judiciary Committee only prepared Articles of Impeachment.
Awww Man. I find Chrisisall correct twice in one week? What next.
Miker:
Nixon was never Impeached.
Only the House can Impeach.
The Senate cannot Impeach.
The Senate can Try after an Impeachment.
The Senate cannot Try until after an Impeachment.
Only the 17th and 42nd Presidents were impeached. Nixon is neither, he was 37th.
A Committee voting to proceed with an Impeachment vote by the full House is not the same thing as being Impeached.
I can write down that Obama is found Impeached, but that has already been done by far smarter folks than I, and it would still not mean that Obama was Impeached, no matter how much it is deserved.
Sorry you are confused by your ignorance. My attempts to correct your errors could be construed as opportunity for you to learn from your mistakes, but we see that is not in the cards for you.
I don't know why you keep refusing to see the word IS in article 1 written by the House, but here it is again.
Article 1
"RESOLVED, That Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanours, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:
This is the House saying he is impeached. They are saying they are going to present this to the Senate. Go back and follow the link I provide.
OK, maybe this will help you understand. Go find the date that the full House of Representatives voted on this RESOLUTION to Impeach the President, and if you really can find that it actually happened, please provide everybody else here who is wrong with the vote totals.
So far it doesn't look like anybody agrees with your interpretation of history.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"Impeachment is a formal process in which an official is accused of unlawful activity, the outcome of which, depending on the country, may include the removal of that official from office as well as criminal or civil punishment."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment
From my US History or was it Civics? class ... I've thought that
impeachment went a bit further than the Accusation. That it included
the discussion of the alleged crimes. However, my instructor told us
that, whether the accused is found guilty or innocent, he has still
been impeached.
So it would mean, an elected official is accused & set for trial by
congress/parliament.
No?
... oooOO}{OOooo ...
I've given up looking for the meaning of life. Now all I want is a cookie.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME