America’s Middle Class Now Officially POORER Than Canada’s
POSTED BY: Niki2
UPDATED: Saturday, February 14, 2026 05:32
VIEWED: 4189
PAGE 1 of 4
Quote:
The American middle class, long the most affluent in the world, has lost that distinction.
While the wealthiest Americans are outpacing many of their global peers, a New York Times analysis shows that across the lower- and middle-income tiers, citizens of other advanced countries have received considerably larger raises over the last three decades.
After-tax middle-class incomes in Canada — substantially behind in 2000 — now appear to be higher than in the United States. The poor in much of Europe earn more than poor Americans.
The numbers, based on surveys conducted over the past 35 years, offer some of the most detailed publicly available comparisons for different income groups in different countries over time. They suggest that most American families are paying a steep price for high and rising income inequality.
Although economic growth in the United States continues to be as strong as in many other countries, or stronger, a small percentage of American households is fully benefiting from it. Median income in Canada pulled into a tie with median United States income in 2010 and has most likely surpassed it since then. Median incomes in Western European countries still trail those in the United States, but the gap in several — including Britain, the Netherlands and Sweden — is much smaller than it was a decade ago.
In European countries hit hardest by recent financial crises, such as Greece and Portugal, incomes have of course fallen sharply in recent years.
The income data were compiled by LIS, a group that maintains the Luxembourg Income Study Database. The numbers were analyzed by researchers at LIS and by The Upshot, a New York Times website covering policy and politics, and reviewed by outside academic economists.
The struggles of the poor in the United States are even starker than those of the middle class. A family at the 20th percentile of the income distribution in this country makes significantly less money than a similar family in Canada, Sweden, Norway, Finland or the Netherlands. Thirty-five years ago, the reverse was true.
LIS counts after-tax cash income from salaries, interest and stock dividends, among other sources, as well as direct government benefits such as tax credits.
The findings are striking because the most commonly cited economic statistics — such as per capita gross domestic product — continue to show that the United States has maintained its lead as the world’s richest large country. But those numbers are averages, which do not capture the distribution of income. With a big share of recent income gains in this country flowing to a relatively small slice of high-earning households, most Americans are not keeping pace with their counterparts around the world.
“The idea that the median American has so much more income than the middle class in all other parts of the world is not true these days,” said Lawrence Katz, a Harvard economist who is not associated with LIS. “In 1960, we were massively richer than anyone else. In 1980, we were richer. In the 1990s, we were still richer.”
That is no longer the case, Professor Katz added.
Median per capita income was $18,700 in the United States in 2010 (which translates to about $75,000 for a family of four after taxes), up 20 percent since 1980 but virtually unchanged since 2000, after adjusting for inflation. The same measure, by comparison, rose about 20 percent in Britain between 2000 and 2010 and 14 percent in the Netherlands. Median income also rose 20 percent in Canada between 2000 and 2010, to the equivalent of $18,700.
The most recent year in the LIS analysis is 2010. But other income surveys, conducted by government agencies, suggest that since 2010 pay in Canada has risen faster than pay in the United States and is now most likely higher. Pay in several European countries has also risen faster since 2010 than it has in the United States.
Three broad factors appear to be driving much of the weak income performance in the United States. First, educational attainment in the United States has risNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Obama's " Mission Acvomplished ".
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Obama's " Mission Acvomplished ".
Say what? This stuff has to be put in place before it begins. That was during the last admin. It is called Tax breaks for the rich. Along with Tax loop holes that benefit them as well.
Let's say I decide to open an office in a tax haven overseas. I call it my headquarters and then divert my profits to that shell headquarters and wait till I get a tax break to bring the money back into the country. This way I avoid paying taxes on that money here. That is a very simple way to describe what companies are doing.
Every thing since around 1970 has been shifting to a very one sided economy.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The rich getting tax breaks has no bearing on how much the middle class make.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
The rich getting tax breaks has no bearing on how much the middle class make.
There is no real benefit in giving them tax breaks either, it would appear.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
The rich getting tax breaks has no bearing on how much the middle class make.
This will show you where it has gone. If you don't trust the site you can read a version of this story at the Bloomberg news.
http://dekerivers.wordpress.com/2014/01/21/top-1-of-worlds-richest-own
-65-times-more-than-worlds-poorest-50-the-85-richest-people-own-more-than-half-of-world/
Top 1% Of World’s Richest Own 65 Times More Than World’s Poorest 50%, The 85 Richest People Own More Than Half Of World
January 21, 2014

1 Votes
Ponder the headline.
It is just a fact that is unacceptable.
A new Oxfam report entitled Working for the Few (PDF), documents a “power grab” by the world’s wealthy super-elite, who have amassed astonishing assets while the rest of the world grew poorer. Not only do the top 1% of the world’s richest own 65 times more than the world’s poorest 50%, but the 85 richest people own more than half the world. Oxfam is clear that this wealth expansion at the top is the result of a horribly corrupt political process by which elected representatives end up making policies to enrich the already-wealthy.
They’re at Davos this week, asking the world’s elites to pledge support for progressive taxation; an end to tax-avoidance; an end to financial corruption of legislation and policy; transparency in their own fortunes; universal healthcare, education and social protection; and a living wage for all.
The Oxfam report found that over the past few decades, the rich have successfully wielded political influence to skew policies in their favour on issues ranging from financial deregulation, tax havens, anti-competitive business practices to lower tax rates on high incomes and cuts in public services for the majority. Since the late 1970s, tax rates for the richest have fallen in 29 out of 30 countries for which data are available, said the report.
This “capture of opportunities” by the rich at the expense of the poor and middle classes has led to a situation where 70% of the world’s population live in countries where inequality has increased since the 1980s and 1% of families own 46% of global wealth – almost £70tn.
Opinion polls in Spain, Brazil, India, South Africa, the US, UK and Netherlands found that a majority in each country believe that wealthy people exert too much influence. Concern was strongest in Spain, followed by Brazil and India and least marked in the Netherlands.
In the UK, some 67% agreed that “the rich have too much influence over where this country is headed” – 37% saying that they agreed “strongly” with the statement – against just 10% who disagreed, 2% of them strongly.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's much easier to whine and complain like little bitches about other people's wealth than to actually strive to attain it for yourself.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
It's much easier to whine and complain like little bitches about other people's wealth than to actually strive to attain it for yourself.
No wining in the report, just facts. The only whining is coming from you in defending what has been transpiring since 1980 and even before. Not with facts but with a whine.
The fact that the middle class has been in decline since 1970 is well established. Where the money is going is a well established fact. To many get caught up in whining about who is to cause. I would suggest that since the top .01% is getting it all that they are responsible.
Makes sense to me.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It is incredible to me how I am at a Firefly fan site and post a research report that even the Bloomberg News does not dispute and runs itself, and many of you are still arguing on a level of, its the Democrats fault no it’s the Republicans in much of the threads posted.
How the Alliance (corporate control) came to be is in this report. Read it.
This is how the corporate ( alliance )world gains control and both parties are to fault. This is that future you hate taking place right before your eyes and so many of you are blind to it because you are caught up in your personal Ideologies. It is you spewing out the spin you were severed up at Fox News or some political contributors at MSNBC, to name two. No spin, just the facts.
WAKE UP!
OK, I am ready. Start the execution.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Princeton Concludes What Kind of Government America Really Has, and It's Not a Democracy
http://www.policymic.com/articles/87719/princeton-concludes-what-kind-
of-government-america-really-has-and-it-s-not-a-democracy
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME