Presidential lies
POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Friday, August 29, 2025 15:06
VIEWED: 27467
PAGE 3 of 24
Don't hold your breath. JSF only exists to make poorly-thought-out attacks and cheerlead for rappy.
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”? Isaac Asimov
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Twins, separated at birth.
Originally posted by Storymark:
JSF only exists to make poorly-thought-out attacks and cheerlead for rappy.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by MIKER:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/national-interest/61883-presi
dential-lying-a-history-primer
Nice, short article on the lies Presidents have told.
What a retard, writing an article about a subject he clearly doesn't even understand. He falsely claims that Nixon was impeached, in his effort to excuse Clinton's 2 impeachments. Yes, Clinton was one of 2 Presidents to be impeached among the country's grand total of 3 impeachments, but Nixon was not among them. For those of you libtards who cannot do the math, that means Clinton was impeached more times than all other Presidents combined.
When a libtard like this cannot even get the basic facts correct, how can you subject yourselves to further drivel from his pie hole?
So, dumbisall, are you trying to claim that RWR traded weapons for hostages in the mid 80's? Can you specify which hostages in the mid 80's were released from Iran after weapons were provided? Even that blogger clown backs down by clarifying that weapons were sold, and then RWR had the gall to do the right thing by violating the Boland Amendment. For a refresher on the Boland/Iran-Contra, see the modern day parable known as Clear and Present Danger by Tom Clancy (for those of you illiterate libtards, view the movie if you cannot follow the book.)
Tom Clancy book clear and present is a work of fiction.
Parable. P. A. R. A. B. L. E.
Check it.
A parable is a story, like an allegory.
Clear and Present Danger was Clancy's parable to help you understand the Boland Amendment and Iran-Contra. You can see Boland and the Democrats represented by Ritter, Cutter, and the President. You can see Reagan, Oliver North, and Poindexter represented by Harrison Ford.
Where is this link that was supposedly posted?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by MIKER:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/national-interest/61883-presi
dential-lying-a-history-primer
Nice, short article on the lies Presidents have told.
What a retard, writing an article about a subject he clearly doesn't even understand. He falsely claims that Nixon was impeached, in his effort to excuse Clinton's 2 impeachments. Yes, Clinton was one of 2 Presidents to be impeached among the country's grand total of 3 impeachments, but Nixon was not among them. For those of you libtards who cannot do the math, that means Clinton was impeached more times than all other Presidents combined.
When a libtard like this cannot even get the basic facts correct, how can you subject yourselves to further drivel from his pie hole?
I am not understanding what it is you are saying.
He claims Nixon was impeached. This is a lie. This is a falsehood. This is a non-truth. Can you understand what I am saying?
Sure, this is a common lie, hoping you will be gullible enough to start assuming lies from liberals will transform into truth. It is also a common diversion to whitewash or excuse the only POTUS to accrue 2 Impeachments. These are actual Impeachments earned by Clinton, meaning this is a fact, a truth, not a lie. Can you understand what I am saying?
This blogger has written a missive, implying that he has some basic understanding of the subject matter. Yet he spouts lies or errors or fibs or euphemisms about the subject matter he has chosen to focus on. So one may wonder: is he stupid? Is he intentionally lying to us? Is he too stupid to understand he is spouting lies? Is he too lazy to perform a basic check of factual data to confirm his predetermined conclusions? Is he intentionally ignoring facts which do not support his false conclusions, and instead using well known lies, easily provable factual errors, to further his cause of feeding you, the consumer of his spew, a larger pile of lies based on a foundation of lies? Can you understand what I am saying?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:"Ain't NOBODY understand the words commin' outta your mouth!"- Detective Carter
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Can you understand what I am saying?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by MIKER:
Richard Nixon resigned from office in disgrace. He was my commander in chief at the time. I did not read the article that upset you, so I don't actually know if he said he was impeached. All I saw was what you said in a response to the article and it was so far from being nonpartisan or accurate I responded to that.
Yes I hear what you are saying, you are incorrect.
I was not incorrect. I was correct and accurate.
The basic inability to differentiate truth. fact, reality from lie, fabrication, fantasy is the foundation for being a modern day liberal.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME