Not Sorry: Bundy Spends Another 20 Minutes Rambling About 'The Negro'
POSTED BY: Niki2
UPDATED: Thursday, March 6, 2025 17:28
VIEWED: 4341
PAGE 1 of 6
Quote:
He stood on a makeshift outdoor stage decked with American flags, with supporters occasionally shouting their approval of him. At the end of the event, a few supporters cursed and yelled at the reporters. Bundy, meanwhile, continued sharing thoughts on "the Negro community" in comments that tracked with the attempted clarification Bundy had given to conservative radio hosts throughout the day.
"The question is: Are they slaves the way they are, the way they live, slaves to charity and government subsidized homes?" Bundy said. "Are they slaves when their daughters are having abortions and their sons in the graves and prisons?"
"This thought goes back a long time over the years," he said.
Of seeing black people in their government-subsidized homes in Las Vegas, he said: "I thought, 'Would they be happier if they was home, talking about the South, where they come from? Would they have been home with their gardens and their chickens and their children playing around them?'"
"Would they? That was the question I ask, and I ask you: Would they be happier?" http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/cliven-bundy-press-conference-n
ot-sorry
Is he fucking KIDDING???? All Blacks come from "the South", and slaves had homes and gardens and chickens???? This man is absolutely amazing...
Even more amazing, Glenn Beck AGREES:Quote:
"That shows you how unhinged from reality this guy is,” he said. "You wondered if blacks were better off as slaves picking cotton and having a family life? They didn’t have a family life! That’s the real key to what he said. And there’s no way around that sentence.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/04/24/rand-p
aul-and-other-republican-leaders-back-away-from-bundy/?tid=pm_pop
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Republicans distance selves from Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy over racial remarks
Prominent Republicans and conservative news media outlets rallied in recent weeks around the cause of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, whose armed standoff with authorities over grazing rights on federal land had made him an instant folk hero on the right.
But Bundy’s GOP defenders, including Sens. Dean Heller (Nev.) and Rand Paul (Ky.), rapidly abandoned him on Thursday following reports of incendiary remarks that the white rancher made about minorities. Bundy wondered aloud whether blacks would be better off as slaves picking cotton, and alleged that people of color are “against us.”
The controversy marks another major headache for establishment Republicans working to build better relationships with blacks and Hispanics — crucial voting blocs that have increasingly supported Democrats in recent elections. The GOP is in the midst of a messaging tour aimed at reintroducing the party to minority voters, including lawmaker visits to minority neighborhoods and to historically black colleges.
“It undermines the broader, more important goals to rebrand and reestablish a conversation with a community that looks suspiciously upon most of the things you say,” said former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele, referring to African Americans in particular.
Steele, who was the RNC’s first black chairman, added that Republicans must declare that “there is no place for this level of ignorance and stupidity around matters of race in our party.”
Bundy said he “hardly ever” saw a black person until he was almost a teenager and noted that he is surrounded by white faces.
“Where is our colored brother? Where is our Mexican brother? Where is our Chinese — where are they?” Bundy said. “They’re just as much American as we are, and they’re not with us. If they’re not with us, they’re going to be against us.”
Before those comments were publicized, a number of prominent Republicans had offered support for Bundy’s cause. Heller, Nevada’s junior senator, said Bundy and his makeshift militia were “patriots” during a local news interview.
And Paul said he was sympathetic with Bundy’s opposition to federal ownership of grazing land, while distancing himself from the militant side of Bundy’s resistance. “I’m for obeying the law, and I’m not for a violent outcome,” Paul said Monday.
Much of that support evaporated Thursday. RNC Chairman Reince Priebus called Bundy’s racial comments “completely beyond the pale” and “100 percent wrong.” Paul said the remarks were “offensive,” while a spokesman for Heller declared them “appalling and racist.”
The rancher is the latest in a series of figures — including rock singer Ted Nugent and “Duck Dynasty” reality show star Phil Robertson — who made controversial racial remarks after being championed by conservatives. Republican operatives acknowledge that those associations have damaged the party’s attempts to rebrand itself.
Crystal Wright, a conservative commentator, said, “Republicans are part of our own problem,” given the regular embrace of figures such as Bundy.
“My parents didn’t sit-in at lunch counters so that they would be told that they would have been better off learning how to pick cotton,” Wright said. “We as conservatives don’t do a great job of cleaning up these racial missteps.”
Some Democrats and political scientists argue that conservative ideology focused on “state’s rights” — an issue linked with preservation of slavery and Jim Crow laws — makes it exceedingly difficult for Republicans to attract minority voters. Bundy’s comments, they said, show a common connection between anti-government ideology and racial animosity.
“He is a window into the soul of modern conservatism,” said Ian Haney López, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley, who wrote a book called “Dog Whistle Politics.” He added, “A demonization of minorities and a demonization of the government i
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
In the coming hours and days, we can expect much of Bundy's existing support to dry up, and it will likely hurt his decades-long cause to graze his cattle on federal land significantly.
But given how all of this is shaping up now, it begs the question: Why did some Republicans see fit to get behind this guy in the first place?
The answer: anger.
Polls in recent years have shown that tea party supporters aren't just skeptical of the federal government; they're actually quite angry at it. A 2013 Pew Research Center poll showed 96 percent of tea partiers said you can only sometimes or never trust the government -- and 20 percent of them volunteered "never," even though it wasn't offered as an option.
Two others things the tea party loves, of course, are guns and the Constitution.
In Bunkerville, Nev., you have a guy who not only doesn't trust the federal government; he says he doesn't believe in it, period. And he's surrounded by armed supporters creating a modern-day militia, as the federal government shows up with its own arms ready for a standoff. The result is basically a tailor-made tea party struggle featuring the little guy against big, intrusive, heavy-handed government.
The tea party is a movement constantly in search of a cause, and it tends to get quite involved basically any time it feels the federal government -- or the GOP establishment -- oversteps its bounds.
When it comes to Republican primaries, this has sometimes led the movement to back unsavory and/or later-discredited candidates, such as Richard Mourdock, Christine O'Donnell or Sharron Angle. All of these candidates were great receptacles for the tea party's anger but turned out to be exceedingly poor messengers for its cause.
The situation with Bundy is much the same. The tea party found what seemed like a good cause, but because it's a rather unwieldy and diffuse organization, its supporters never truly vetted the man whose lot they was throwing in with.
This is Politics 101; anytime you join a cause, you make darn sure you want to be seen with the guy/gal leading the charge. But the tea party can't or won't figure this out.
And today, the Republicans and tea partiers who had the poor judgment to get too friendly with Bundy's cause are paying the price. Excerpts from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/04/24/cliven-bundy
-the-tea-partys-latest-anti-hero/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The story popped up before I had a chance to get in my $0.02.
The RW fawning all over this asshole as if he represented some sort of "rights" is ridiculous. The man stole grazing rights from Federal land. That's MY land and YOUR land he stole from; it belongs to ALL of us. It constitutes our wild heritage, and it's our environmental "bank" against climate change.
I don't agree with him stealing from MY land any more than I agree that corporations should get to degrade MY land in pursuit of profit.
It's nice to see that this asshole is exposed for the asshole that he is, but his racial views are irrelevant to his crime. Personally, I hope he fries in jail for a couple dozen decades.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Republican politicians blasted the Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy on Thursday for making flagrantly racist remarks instead of employing the subtler racial code words the G.O.P. has been using for decades.
“We Republicans have worked long and hard to develop insidious racial code words like ‘entitlement society’ and ‘personal responsibility,’” said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky). “There is no excuse for offensive racist comments like the ones Cliven Bundy made when there are so many subtler ways of making the exact same point.”
Fox News also blasted the rancher, saying in a statement, “Cliven Bundy’s outrageous racist remarks undermine decades of progress in our effort to come up with cleverer ways of saying the same thing.”
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
His views on race are completely consistent with the GOP's. That's why he's a right wing hero.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
But given how all of this is shaping up now, it begs the question: Why did some Republicans see fit to get behind this guy in the first place?
The answer: anger.
Of course they're angry - and ironically it's over what I consider one of the few, rare 'benefits' of Government....
That it keeps them from inflicting their RELIGION, and their abhorrent and disgusting so-called moral "values" upon the rest of us by force.
They're angry that the "Gubmint" cockblocks them from putting minorities, women and the poor "in their place".
Cause that's what this is all about, it's what it ALWAYS has ever been about, ever since Hamilton, Jay and Madison argued for a new aristocracy with themselves at the head of it.
-Frem
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Thanx for the giggle, Second; it couldn't have been more on point!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by ElvisChrist:
His views on race are completely consistent with the GOP's. That's why he's a right wing hero.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The Kochs and their allies want an all-powerful oligarchy with a theocratic government to dumb down and control the serfs.
Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
But given how all of this is shaping up now, it begs the question: Why did some Republicans see fit to get behind this guy in the first place?
The answer: anger.
Of course they're angry - and ironically it's over what I consider one of the few, rare 'benefits' of Government....
That it keeps them from inflicting their RELIGION, and their abhorrent and disgusting so-called moral "values" upon the rest of us by force.
They're angry that the "Gubmint" cockblocks them from putting minorities, women and the poor "in their place".
Cause that's what this is all about, it's what it ALWAYS has ever been about, ever since Hamilton, Jay and Madison argued for a new aristocracy with themselves at the head of it.
-Frem
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME