UKRAINE'S BLOODIEST DAY: YET TO COME
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Saturday, May 23, 2026 04:54
VIEWED: 8528
PAGE 4 of 7
I'm sure you've seen the headlines by now, but just in case
Putin calls for use of troops in Ukraine
Simferopol, Ukraine (CNN) -- [Breaking News Update, 10:02 a.m. ET]Quote:
(CNN) -- Russia's upper house of parliament voted Saturday to approve the use of military force in Ukraine. The vote was unanimous.
[Original Story, published 9:23 a.m. ET]
(CNN) -- Russian President Vladimir Putin has asked the upper house of parliament for approval to send Russian troops into Ukraine's Crimea region to normalize the political situation there, the Kremlin said Saturday.
Due to the "extraordinary situation in Ukraine," Putin said, there are threats to the lives of Russian citizens and Russian military personnel based in the southern Crimean region. It comes on the same day that the new pro-Russian leader of Crimea, Sergey Aksyonov, asked Putin for help in maintaining peace in the Black Sea peninsula -- where Russia has a major naval base at Sevastopol.
International concerns are mounting that Moscow may intervene militarily in the crisis, despite warnings from the United States and other Western powers that it should respect Ukrainian sovereignty.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/01/world/europe/ukraine-politics/index.html
?hpt=hp_t1
Yanno, I know that lives were lost, but more than anything it's our fucking hypocrisy that galls me. We go around ruining nations, and then we wonder why so many people hate us. Jeezus chrissus, are we all fucking morons??? 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Rappy- pinning the USA reaction to the Russian invasion of Georgia (AFTER Georgia fired on S Ossetia) on SENATOR Obama was... well, what can I say? Fucking stupid. But then, that's what I've come to expect from you. Because, last I checked, George W Bush was President at the time.
You're missing the point, ENTIRELY ! Palin predicted this would happen, and sure enough. - WHAM ! It did.
Quote:
Now, as far as I'm concerned, the best thing Obama could do is stay out of the Ukraine, the same way that he stayed out of Syria. There are several reasons for this:
Yeah, but he's drawing a line in the sand, yet again. If you're going to talk big, then act big. IF not , stay the hell out of the kitchen.
So, just be clear, we've had the 3AM call ( Benghazi ) where both Obama and Hillary ran and hid. Not 1 arrest has been made. Save for the guy who made the YouTube vid, which had zero to do w/ the 9-11 attack in Libya.
Now we've had the Ukraine stuff go down, as that so called " Caribou Barbie " called it, so long ago.
Bush was on his way out when the Georgian conflict arose, in August of '08. The world was looking more towards McCain and Obama to get an idea of who would be leading the country for the next 4 years. And Palin was correct in reminding all just how inept and weak Obama would be , as President. Putin knew , too.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:What's worse: Saying stupid things, or doubling-down on stupid by ACTING stupid? Only a stupid person would encourage the latter, and that would be you.
Yeah, but he's drawing a line in the sand, yet again. If you're going to talk big, then act big. IF not , stay the hell out of the kitchen.
A friend of mine, who is very familiar with nuclear power stations and military capabilities (ours and theirs) pointed out that...
Quote:
The United States of America has over a hundred (what one prominent US General called) 'pre-deployed nuclear weapons' spread across the Eastern United States. Even a single low-yield nuclear weapon of approximately 250 kilotons striking in the vicinity of one of these reactors would cause a reactor meltdown and fantastic long-term lethal radiological contamination.
Indian Point alone, just 10 miles outside of New York city, contains the equivalent of 20 Fukushimas. The resulting explosive force and radiation from scattered nuclear material, much of it aerosolized, would in most certainty, leave the extended city of New York lethally contaminated for centuries. This result in most likelihood would make all of New York State and large parts of the Northeast uninhabitable.
That is A SINGLE nuclear power station, and A SINGLE low-yield nuclear weapon. A single submarine in the Russian navy carries 20 multi-targetable warheads on a single missile. The total number of missiles on a submarine varies from 8-12. That makes it a possibility of 240 warheads. Also, each of these warheads is independently maneuverable. That means that with even 50% losses, they could hit 120 nuclear power plants. If I understand this, then I'm pretty sure the Russian military does too.
Therefore, this proposal is the equivalent of the desire to see the entire destruction of the United States of America with no possibility of recovery within the foreseeable future, let alone the incredible loss of life involved. Only someone with absolutely no understanding of physics, or empathy toward human life would consider such a solution. Such a person is obviously a sociopath.
This is one submarine. No intercontinental ballistic missiles and no close-range missiles deployed at the Arctic. We are talking about the possibility of over 6000 multi-warheaded missiles being deployed. Even 10% of these missiles getting through would cause the complete destruction of the North American continent. This is plain and simple insanity.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So, is Obama fucking dumb, or suicidally crazy? yeah, let me just poke the big bear one more time with my little stick ...
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
WOW, difficult choice! A lot of both???
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:
You're missing the point, ENTIRELY !
The point is......
"HEY I'm RAPPY.... EVERYONE LOOK AT ME WHILE I DO MY LITTLE "HEY I'M RAPPY " DANCE.
Who cares if the world is going to shit, as long as you all give me the attention I deserve".
Etc, etc, etc.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Really Sig ? A " friend " of yours, pointed THIS out...
Quote:
The United States of America has over a hundred (what one prominent US General called) 'pre-deployed nuclear weapons' spread across the Eastern United States. Even a single low-yield nuclear weapon of approximately 250 kilotons striking in the vicinity of one of these reactors would cause a reactor meltdown and fantastic long-term lethal radiological contamination.
Indian Point alone, just 10 miles outside of New York city, contains the equivalent of 20 Fukushimas. The resulting explosive force and radiation from scattered nuclear material, much of it aerosolized, would in most certainty, leave the extended city of New York lethally contaminated for centuries. This result in most likelihood would make all of New York State and large parts of the Northeast uninhabitable.
That is A SINGLE nuclear power station, and A SINGLE low-yield nuclear weapon. A single submarine in the Russian navy carries 20 multi-targetable warheads on a single missile. The total number of missiles on a submarine varies from 8-12. That makes it a possibility of 240 warheads. Also, each of these warheads is independently maneuverable. That means that with even 50% losses, they could hit 120 nuclear power plants. If I understand this, then I'm pretty sure the Russian military does too.
Therefore, this proposal is the equivalent of the desire to see the entire destruction of the United States of America with no possibility of recovery within the foreseeable future, let alone the incredible loss of life involved. Only someone with absolutely no understanding of physics, or empathy toward human life would consider such a solution. Such a person is obviously a sociopath.
This is one submarine. No intercontinental ballistic missiles and no close-range missiles deployed at the Arctic. We are talking about the possibility of over 6000 multi-warheaded missiles being deployed. Even 10% of these missiles getting through would cause the complete destruction of the North American continent. This is plain and simple insanity.
What the hell, did you happen to be dictating at the time ? And who casually " points out " 5 or so paragraphs of info ? On the matter of nuclear weapons capability ?
Who the HELL is talking jumpin right into the fray w/ nukes anyways ??? Over react much ?
OED - Pointing things out to you, even by using small words, still doesn't help you out much, I see. There wasn't an iota of " look at me! " here, what so ever. I pointed out why I posted, you're either pretending to be stupid or...
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
definition of a troll: "and I refuse to chase others in a mindless, endless circle of " debate " on the internet. If I 'bitch out' of a discussion, I've said all I'm going to say on the matter, my views have been presented, and there's nothing left to add."
RUSH LIMBAUGH is a BLUE PILL ADDICT!
As evidence of "rape mentality"
Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:11 PM
MAL4PREZ
And just remember, according to Rappy, the term befitting a women who wants the insurance she pays for to cover medications affecting her reproductive organs is whore
Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:23 PM
little rappy
The term applies
And this is Geezer being non-partisan ... HAHAHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...
Dem Super Pac slams Obamacare because it really sucks and will cause herpes
Geezer
So some Democrats are running on pointing out that the Healthcare.gov rollout was an unmitigated disaster
I feel so vindicated.
"Just glad that some Democrats are acknowledging the bad job done in developing Healthcare.com." "it'll be interesting to see if these same Democrats acknowledge" "these Democrats seem to understand what the real Obama Kool-Ade drinkers still won't address" " it's about Democrats using criticism of the rollout in their campaign ads".
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I pointed out the website and got an email, which I quoted with permission. So, what's your problem? And do you have anything RELEVANT to say??? Apparently not. So....
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I pointed out the website and got an email, which I quoted with permission.
A better, fuller explanation than was given.
Clears things up a bit.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME