Real World Event Discussions

US approves arms to Syrian rebels

POSTED BY: kpo
UPDATED: Monday, April 7, 2025 06:19
VIEWED: 2091
PAGE 1 of 3

KPO
Friday, June 14, 2013 1:32 PM

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22899289

Well Auraptor, do you admit you were wrong with all you were saying about Pres. Obama sticking to his word?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

KPO
Friday, June 14, 2013 11:30 PM

One analyst's take - Obama wants to prolong the war to make it attritional for all the US's regional enemies:

Quote:


Why is President Obama escalating U.S. involvement in the Syrian civil war? Dan Drezner offers this take, which he's been murmuring about occasionally for the past year:

[Obama's goal] is to ensnare Iran and Hezbollah into a protracted, resource-draining civil war, with as minimal costs as possible. This is exactly what the last two years have accomplished.... at an appalling toll in lives lost.

This policy doesn't require any course correction... so long as rebels are holding their own or winning. A faltering Assad simply forces Iran et al into doubling down and committing even more resources....For the low, low price of aiding and arming the rebels, the U.S. preoccupies all of its adversaries in the Middle East.

....Now let's be clear: to describe this as "morally questionable" would be an understatement. It's a policy that makes me very uncomfortable... until one considers the alternatives. What it's not, however, is a return to liberal hawkery.

In a nutshell, the idea here is that we want both sides to be evenly matched so the fighting continues as long as possible. That will weaken pretty much everyone we hate: Assad, Hezbollah, Iran, and the Al Qaeda groups among the rebels. As long as these folks continue killing each other, we're happy.

Is it a sign of terminal naiveté that I find myself unable to believe that this is conscious Obama administration policy? Or has Drezner simply been watching too much Game of Thrones?



It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, June 14, 2013 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22899289

Well Auraptor, do you admit you were wrong with all you were saying about Pres. Obama sticking to his word?




Only took him 2 months ?

Are you saying this is a good development, then, and that you support more arms to this place ?

I'm saying it was stupid to draw a line in the sand, and then do nothing for weeks, months, and THEN to sent some flunky out to make the statement of arms going ,intead of appearing in the Rose Garden or before Congress himself.



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

KPO
Friday, June 14, 2013 11:52 PM

Quote:


Quote:
Originally posted by kpo:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22899289

Well Auraptor, do you admit you were wrong with all you were saying about Pres. Obama sticking to his word?



Only took him 2 months ?



That's a no then.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, June 14, 2013 11:55 PM

Too bad Reagan isn't alive to see this, but he's dead.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, June 15, 2013 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:


Quote:
Originally posted by kpo:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22899289

Well Auraptor, do you admit you were wrong with all you were saying about Pres. Obama sticking to his word?



Only took him 2 months ?



That's a no then.

It's not personal. It's just war.



Actually, I said it was a stupid threat to make in the 1st place, and he DID flounder and do nothing for 2 months. Hell, he's still done nothing, other than make more promises.

" In a nutshell, the idea here is that we want both sides to be evenly matched so the fighting continues as long as possible. That will weaken pretty much everyone we hate: Assad, Hezbollah, Iran, and the Al Qaeda groups among the rebels. As long as these folks continue killing each other, we're happy. "

Boy, that Nobel Peace Prize is sure getting a great return on THAT investment, ain't it ?

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, June 15, 2013 12:04 AM

Quote:

Too bad Reagan isn't alive to see this, but he's dead.
Yeah, he could have sold arms to the Iranians and used the money to fund ... oh, wait, he did that already!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, June 15, 2013 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Too bad Reagan isn't alive to see this, but he's dead.
Yeah, he could have sold arms to the Iranians and used the money to fund ... oh, wait, he did that already!



...and still dead.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, June 15, 2013 12:15 AM

Quote:

..and still dead.
Thank goodness!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, June 15, 2013 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

..and still dead.
Thank goodness!



Atleast he tried to make a profit from the deal, Barry just gives it away.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME