Dead or Alive? The thread that decides it once and for all.
POSTED BY: Wishimay
UPDATED: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 23:13
VIEWED: 22439
PAGE 4 of 6
Dead -- but Mr. Universe could bring him back as a shiny, new robot. Oh wait, he's dead, too... Noooooooooo!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Bumpity ^
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
..."living with" is a relative term... Perhaps if you used the past tense?
Why, I haven't killed anyone...uh...
I say "Do not look at that body behind the curtain....I AM THE GREAT AND POWERFUL OZ AND..."
Well, now ya know where some of our old-timers went, heh.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Alive. (How can I go against my moniker?)
We need to keep our heads so we can ... keep our heads.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
ded
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.nooalf.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Bumpin up in case anyone missed it...
You only have 'nother month and some to decide if you're mulling it over...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Actually I honestly think Book is more plot relevant than Wash, so if I had to choose, it would be Book who comes back. Or some technological clone/ doppelganger of Book with not necessarily all of his memories (possibly villainous? And then he could go through a similar transformative experience that he winds up as a preacher).
But I don't really see a good storyline justification for either of them as neither of them are in the good graces of anyone who might have access to technology like that. So unless River suddenly becomes a reality warper or it turns out the movie was just a dream, probably not happening.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Dead and alive.
David
'Begone, sugar-free candy antichrist!' - Nathan Rabin.
'Geeks can't admit that anything worthwhile was invented before 1981. Soon, "making cocoa" will be called "milk hacking."' - Lore Sjoberg
http://xkcd.com/386/
"Don't worry. Captain Hammer will save us." - Penny.
I has myspace - http://www.myspace.com/daveshayneforpresident
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by daveshayne:
Dead and alive.
Schrödinger's space pilot?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
SNIP
But I don't really see a good storyline justification for either of them as neither of them are in the good graces of anyone who might have access to technology like that.
Wash can be returned to the Firefly story using
already established in-the-'verse-tech:
Put Wash in River's cryo-box to take him home for burial.
Along the way, Simon informs the crew
that the same medical tech that produced Tracy's hopped up internal organs
("million credit meat" in Tracy's words)
are accessible at Government research facilities.
Using a bit of improvisation and Book's ident card,
they sneak Wash in place of a politico who bumped a deserving recipient
(ala PA's governor Casey who bumped everybody down the list for his transplant).
Alliance bashing, witty dialog and some gunplay ensues.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME