" Psychotic " Individual here.
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Saturday, November 29, 2025 15:54
VIEWED: 11833
PAGE 2 of 9
Is it psychotic to think I got mine, fuck you?
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
'Lincoln' Screenwriter: Obama Win a Rejection of 'Psychotic' Reagan Era IdeologyQuote:
And now that we're facing challenges like climate change that absolutely demand a global collective response, an organized global collective response. We have no hope for survival as a species if we continue down the path of this kind of psychotic individualism...I think we're beginning to see, in the last election we saw, I think, a real rejection. I mean what Romney basically had to offer was the same old trickle-down nonsense and people said I don't believe it any more.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2013/02/15/lincoln-scree
nwriter-obama-win-rejection-psychotic-reagan-era-ideo#ixzz2L17n59cC
Curious...
“We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all.” - Nikita Khrushchev
“The main plank in the National Socialist program is to abolish the liberalistic concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity and to substitute for them the folk community, rooted in the soil and bound together by the bond of its common blood.” - Benito Mussolini
“We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what’s best for society.” - Hillary Clinton
http://www.boortz.com/weblogs/nealz-nuze/2012/oct/11/war-against-indiv
idualism/
So, being a INDIVIDUAL is a liberal mindset, is it ? So says Mussolini. So why then, are all these LIBERALS so hell bent on destroying the concept of the individual ?
Ayn Rand sums it up quite nicely ... “The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.”
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AgentRouka:Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Mussolini and Khrushchev weren't talking about global warming, but global control.
But you chose to create a connection between those two and the original piece on climate change. THAT's the thing I'm questioning.
The original piece wasn't about 'climate change', at all. That was just one facet of the discussion,on how Obama doing super great things, and part of that is waging war on the individual.
Quote:
What on earth is extreme about the opinion that global climate change cannot be solely addressed at an individual level?
The opinion that man caused global change is itself - REAL -, and also that the govt can use this phony issue as a excuse for taxing the hell out everything, all under the guise of ' saving the planet '.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
Resident USA Freedom Fundie
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You forgot to post this as a part of his statement:
"The individual is very important but just as important to human beings is our relational capacity."
Just sayin'
SGG
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2013/02/15/lincoln-scree
nwriter-obama-win-rejection-psychotic-reagan-era-ideo#ixzz2L4aw2mxO
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
'Lincoln' Screenwriter: Obama Win a Rejection of 'Psychotic' Reagan Era IdeologyQuote:
And now that we're facing challenges like climate change that absolutely demand a global collective response, an organized global collective response. We have no hope for survival as a species if we continue down the path of this kind of psychotic individualism...I think we're beginning to see, in the last election we saw, I think, a real rejection. I mean what Romney basically had to offer was the same old trickle-down nonsense and people said I don't believe it any more.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2013/02/15/lincoln-scree
nwriter-obama-win-rejection-psychotic-reagan-era-ideo#ixzz2L17n59cC
Curious...
“We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all.” - Nikita Khrushchev
“The main plank in the National Socialist program is to abolish the liberalistic concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity and to substitute for them the folk community, rooted in the soil and bound together by the bond of its common blood.” - Benito Mussolini
“We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what’s best for society.” - Hillary Clinton
http://www.boortz.com/weblogs/nealz-nuze/2012/oct/11/war-against-indiv
idualism/
So, being a INDIVIDUAL is a liberal mindset, is it ? So says Mussolini. So why then, are all these LIBERALS so hell bent on destroying the concept of the individual ?
Ayn Rand sums it up quite nicely ... “The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.”
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Hey Mr. Auraptor,
He was talking about GLOBAL Warming. That means that everybody in the world will be affected, not just the US. Do you think that if we just close our eyes that we, as a nation, will not be affected by the results?
No, he wasn't.
Quote:
Do you think we will solely survive climate change while the rest of the world goes down in flames? Will America separate from the rest of the world and somehow float safely on the rising oceans? And what does Mussolini have to do with it?
The oceans rise and fall, through out the millennia. Always have. Climate change does occur, and will always occur, but there's nothing man can do to stop it.
This issue has nothing to do w/ Climate change. Mussolini was talking about the need to basically enslave everyone into the mindset that what's good for the State is all that really matters. That point of view runs counter to the very idea of what the Founders of this country had in mind.
Quote:
Everyone in the industrial nations must come together to at least nullify the effects of climate change, or we will suffer along with the rest of the WORLD.
SGG
Do we need to do more to clean up this planet ? Yep. Is there anything we can do to " nullify " climate change? No way in hell. Nor should we even try.
But since you're so hell bent on making this about climate change ( credit the propaganda machine which has you seeing this as any sort of an issue at all, instead of the bigger point, of govt power gone amok ) Remember what Hugo Chavez said, at where?
A 'climate control' conference.
Quoting Karl Marx , for starters. You ask me what it has to do w/ climate change?
Ask Hugo Chavez the same question. It has NOTHING to do w/ climate change. It has to do w/ massive, big govt control, and abolishing the rights of the individual.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
Resident USA Freedom Fundie
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
The original piece wasn't about 'climate change', at all. That was just one facet of the discussion,on how Obama doing super great things, and part of that is waging war on the individual.
So you just chose to leave out all those other parts in your initial rant, right? You decided to focus on the quote about climate change, and then you're made because people took you at your word and discussed climate change as a problem bigger than any one individual, and now you're shitting your diaper about that. Funny.
"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero
"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012
Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"
Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I made no 'rant'. The comments by the screen writer were about the war on individualism, I clearly pointed that out. The title of the piece , which I linked to, was exactly about that, and had zero to do with global warming. Says so , right at the top of the thread.
The only one here w/ messy poopy pants is you, Kwickie.
Ya might want to see to that.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
Resident USA Freedom Fundie
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The motives of the Left , as admirable as they may seem, will always been unattainable because of the methods they use.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
Resident USA Freedom Fundie
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by ElfWatcher:
Please remember that the full name of the NAZI party (Which Hitler co-opted) was the National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party. Yeah folks, they were left wingers.
That is absolute horseshit.
Hitler and his ilk put actual socialists into camps before they even started on the Jewish people. They were right wing. Far radical right wing.
You seriously want to stop trying to rewrite history because you recognize a few terms in their party name and then conflate that to mean something it doesn't.
Seriously, you don't need to use Hitler if you want to demonstrate that Socialism/Communism has its horrid potential. Just go with the classic Russian example and be content. I mean, ffs, do you really think you need pretend-lefty Hitler for that?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AgentRouka:Quote:
Originally posted by ElfWatcher:
Please remember that the full name of the NAZI party (Which Hitler co-opted) was the National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party. Yeah folks, they were left wingers.
That is absolute horseshit.
Hitler and his ilk put actual socialists into camps before they even started on the Jewish people. They were right wing. Far radical right wing.
No, they weren't. That's the great misconception that is pushed by , gee, I wonder who? But it's completely false.
Quote:
You seriously want to stop trying to rewrite history because you recognize a few terms in their party name and then conflate that to mean something it doesn't.
Seriously, you don't need to use Hitler if you want to demonstrate that Socialism/Communism has its horrid potential. Just go with the classic Russian example and be content. I mean, ffs, do you really think you need pretend-lefty Hitler for that?
Probably should learn your history some more then.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
Resident USA Freedom Fundie
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oooookay. I really didn't know this sort of revisionist history angle was even a thing. Like, a serious thing. Honestly baffled.
Is this where you put Stalin and Hitler and Mussolini and Franco and every other dictator firmly in the left wing corner to "prove" that all left thought is evil and nothing bad could ever arise from the political right? Is that the angle? I mean, do you honestly think that the further right you go nothing bad could lurk at the extreme end? That the political spectrum is a one-direction line from good to evil? That all totalitarian oppression could only arise from one corner only? What about theocratic oppression, is that also born from extreme left-wing socialism? What?
So who's given credible evidence for that theory, then? And why, oh why, did Hitler so brutally act against his socialist brethren if they all wanted the same thing?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME