FEINSTEIN: 'I'VE NEVER SEEN WORSE' INTELLIGENCE LEAKS
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Sunday, November 16, 2025 14:27
VIEWED: 3416
PAGE 4 of 5
Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
Quote:
Wasted asshattery
Yeah, but if were about Repubs, Raptor would no reason to post it!
Actually, Niki, this is about national security, which trumps party affiliation. Or should. Pity that you don't see it that way.
" We're all just folk. " - Mal
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/06/10/rep-peter-king-national-security-
Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Peter King (R-NY), sat down with Jamie Colby today on America’s News HQ to discuss the investigation into the leaks on counter-terrorism programs. Congressman King said, “This is the most shameful cascade of leaks I’ve ever heard or seen in government. We’re not talking about an incidental leak coming out … We’re talking about leaks involving two of the most sensitive programs in the United States government.”
He said it’s “clear” from those stories published in The New York Times that the information “came from the White House, came right from the National Security Council, came right from the Situation Room.” Rep. King continued, “For the president to say he’s outraged by this … how come he said nothing about it until a few of us, including John McCain, stood up and took him to task for it.”
leaks-came-from-the-white-house/
" We're all just folk. " - Mal
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Nothing trumps party affiliation. Nothing. You and Fox News have proven that.
Originally posted by AURaptor:
this is about national security, which trumps party affiliation. Or should.
Chrisisall, wearing a frilly Mal thing on his head, and ready to shoot unarmed, full-body armoured Operatives
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Oh, so now you're all for the idiotic conspiracy. Why am I not shocked?
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/06/10/rep-peter-king-national-security-
Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Peter King (R-NY), sat down with Jamie Colby today on America’s News HQ to discuss the investigation into the leaks on counter-terrorism programs. Congressman King said, “This is the most shameful cascade of leaks I’ve ever heard or seen in government. We’re not talking about an incidental leak coming out … We’re talking about leaks involving two of the most sensitive programs in the United States government.”
He said it’s “clear” from those stories published in The New York Times that the information “came from the White House, came right from the National Security Council, came right from the Situation Room.” Rep. King continued, “For the president to say he’s outraged by this … how come he said nothing about it until a few of us, including John McCain, stood up and took him to task for it.”
leaks-came-from-the-white-house/
HKCavalier
Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Yeah, Chris...amusing, isn't it? With no knowledge whatsoever of what I know or whether it's pro-DiFi or anti-DiFi, or pro-Obama or anti-Obama, he jumps to his usual conclusion and runs with it. Makes me giggle, he does.
Nothing trumps party affiliation. Nothing. You and Fox News have proven that.
Hint: I'm no fan of DiFi...many of us aren't. We've known her for a long time and, although I appreciate some of the stands she takes (when she takes them) and mostly how she votes, I and many other Californians are fully aware that her words and actions are as often as not politically expediency. He can figure it out for himself. Or go on assuming, makes no difference to me...just makes me giggle.
This whole thread is only important to Raptor so he could put it up as part of his partisan jihad. Wouldn't interest him otherwise, we all know that. Yours is the salient point: Partisanship trumps ALL, where he's concerned. I guess he didn't notice that only 61% of Democrats (only 82 of 208) voted for the war--the same percentage of Americans who said just days before the invasion that they were ready for such an invasion "in the next week or two." (wiki), while all but EIGHT Republicans voted for it (and two of those were "no vote")...I guess that makes some kind of point...like maybe, knowing what they did, the Dems reflected the American people while the Repubs happily followed where Dubya led?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:Quote:Nothing trumps party affiliation. Nothing. You and Fox News have proven that.
Originally posted by AURaptor:
this is about national security, which trumps party affiliation. Or should.
Me and FOX news ? What about nearly the full Dem party, being for the war in Iraq, before being against it ?
Idiot.
@ HK
Huh? Conspiracy theory ? What the F are you even talking about ? I posted what the Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Peter King said, from an interview. That's all.
" We're all just folk. " - Mal
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
YOOO HOOO
Little Rappy ...
Are you avoiding something?
Here's the link from that thread you just didn't understand.
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=52174
And to make it perfectly clear to others what the question was about that you keep ducking (if not to you):
here is SignyM's post
Tax the ultra-wealthy...a lot.
here is your post:
Yeah, Carter TRIED that, how'd that work out for him ?
here is the chart showing Nixon AND Ford TRIED taxing the wealthy, while Carter LOWERED axes on the wealthy (cap gains):
and here is your post where you lied about what you posted:
I never said Carter raised taxes ...
So, let's take it back to the thread where it belongs.
How is it that you don't criticize Nixon and Ford, who taxed the wealthy greatly, but blame Carter for 'trying' high taxes on the wealthy when he lowered them?
And btw that lowering of taxes - how'd that work out for him?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Idiot.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's not lying, sorry. You still seem confused at that concept. It's really not that tricky.
The economies under Ford and Carter weren't identical, were they ? I was little, so I don't recall. But maybe had Ford cut taxes, like Reagan wanted to in '76, he'd have been elected and we'd never had the mistake of Carter in the first place.
But enough of that side track. Carter maintained ( tried ) high personal income taxes. That didn't work out too well, did it ?
I never said he RAISED them, did I?
I didn't lie. Sorry. You fail.
" We're all just folk. " - Mal
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Just like with Miss Wombat. She would have failed you, but she didn't want to see you in her class the following year.
Originally posted by AURaptor:
I didn't lie. Sorry. You fail.
Chrisisall, wearing a frilly Mal thing on his head, and ready to shoot unarmed, full-body armoured Operatives
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME