Invisible Man
POSTED BY: Grounded
UPDATED: Friday, August 13, 2004 10:24
VIEWED: 7476
PAGE 2 of 3
I was upset as well but the Sci-Fio Channel said it was due to low ratings. But they went and canceled this series even though it was one of the best that Sci-Fi had going for it. The same is said for Farscape.
I gave up on the Sci-Fi Network simply because they have no worthwhile shows, call Stargate SG-1 an original Sci-Fi show, which it ain't because it's an original Showtime, cancel good shows like Invisible Man and Farscape.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
To be fair, it wasn't that great. When it was good it was good, but when it was bad it was just plain hokey. Hobbes deserves his own spin-off show though ;)
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Love Hobbes. Love Fawkes. They should've had a thrid season. Grr. Dumb ass Sci-fi channel... Anyways, my friend got the entire series on DVD...VCD or...something. from some guy off ebay for 78$.
----------------
"Hell if Jesus had the power than so do I
To rise up from the dead and take up to the sky"
--Scissor Sisters
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
78 dollars is a tad steep isn't it??
The Strawberry Monkey
http://p221.ezboard.com/bfireflyfanficawards
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Wordsmith:
The problem with the UK DVD release of The Invisible Man was ... it was the WRONG Invisible Man for UK audiences ... in the UK we never saw the latest incarnation (unless it was on some obscure satellite channel), and the last series we saw of that name was the David McCallum version from the late 70's or thereabouts.
Quite right! That's the Invisible man I want - not this other stuff..
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I gave up on the Sci-Fi Network simply because they have no worthwhile shows, call Stargate SG-1 an original Sci-Fi show, which it ain't because it's an original Showtime, cancel good shows like Invisible Man and Farscape.
They can call it an original series because seasons 6-8 *are* original to the SF channel.
Then, of course, there's Stargate Atlantis, which is a true SFC Original Series. Not exactly outshining SG1, but keeping pace with it nicely so far.
Let's see....Battlestar Galactica 2005 starts in January. That looks very promising. And there's the Earthsea mini. (In fact, most of SFC's minis have been at least decent.)
Its true there was a time when there was nothing worthwhile on the SFC, but I think that is past now. The future is actually looking pretty decent.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by jebbypal:
78 dollars is a tad steep isn't it??
Yeah, but she's awful at budgeting. We still haven't even finished watching them.
----------------
"Hell if Jesus had the power than so do I
To rise up from the dead and take up to the sky"
--Scissor Sisters
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey I just caught this on Sci Fi in Uk rerun from the start - its not bad - its not great either but it passes an hour!! Certainly not the worst on the Sci Fi channel by a long shot- Special Unit 5 comes to mind - urgh!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Doyou mean special unit 2? or is special unit 5 something different? Special unit 2 was actually pretty funny from what I recall. It was an interesting mix of X-Files and Men in Black. Took place in Chicago (Chi-town) there was a gnome (or something similar) thief that was always "helping" but getting into more trouble.
Visit WWW.Marillion.Com for a better way to live
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Thats it - Special Unit 2! I knew it was somethin like that - I watched cos John DeLancey was in it but I have to admit I only watched a couple of episodes! yeah there was a gnome in it. I'm afraid it wasn't my cup of tea although it was amusing, but for me not for the right reasons! Each to their own though.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME