Top Secret video of WTC explosive controlled demolition on 9/11
POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Monday, March 14, 2011 03:46
VIEWED: 11704
PAGE 1 of 8
Just released this week after Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by Cryptome (the REAL wikileaks) against the pathological liars in the kosher media mafiya, to protect the juice who perped the 9/11 terrorist attacks:
Quote:
WTC Attack September 11, 2001 from New York Police Helicopter
Video obtained by FOIA to NIST by an anonymous person who directed it be sent to Cryptome. Excerpt of the NIST letter.
Quote: These electronic files image were provided to NIST by the New York Police Department. The City of New York has provided NIST with the following notice:
"Please take notice that the City of New York ("City") has asserted that the contents of the enclosed DVD-ROM is protected under tbe Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. sections 101 et seq. Tbe City expressly reserves its rights in these materials, and requires that you obtain the City's permission prior to any reproduction, modification, adaptation, recompilation, or other derivative use of each DVD-ROM or portion thereof, including any still image extracted or derived therefrom, and that the City's permission be obtained prior to the commercial distribution of any video footage and of still or moving images extracted or derived therefrom in any medium, by sale, rental, lease, lending or other means. The City requires that the instant notice accompany any moving or still images that you disseminate for any reason, including dissemination that complies with the fair use authorized by section 107 of the Copyright Act, and requires that each recipient of these materials comply with the instant Notice. Moreover, the City requires that a summary statement of its copyright be embedded in any moving or still images extracted from the enclosed DVD-ROM that are broadcast in any medium for any purpose. This summary statement shall read as follows: "Copyright (c) NYPD." Please write to the New York City Police Department, Legal Bureau, 1 Police Plaza, Room 1406, New York, N. Y. 10038, for information about obtaining an appropriate license." Unquote
The video has been uploaded as provided by NIST without modification. Original in VOB format, 700MB.
A related collection of 153 still photos from another NYPD helicopter:
http://cryptome.org/0001/wtc-nist-gjs/wtc-nist-gjs.zip (64MB)
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Another topic that doesn't matter, but never dies... And which, like Obama's birth certificate, PN is desperate to go on believing...
Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sorry, wasn't on the list. I suspect it's a topic that matters.
If it were terrorism, it wouldn't matter, but it's not, it's an inside job conspiracy theory. Some of these people are jews, but jews isnt the topic, it still matters. The US govt. attacked its own citizenry. Everybody knows, but no one wants to admit it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Well, plenty of people admit it. It's just the rest of the folks who don't want to consider that possibility chalk us up as crazy.
Originally posted by dreamtrove:
The US govt. attacked its own citizenry. Everybody knows, but no one wants to admit it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
CTS,
yeah, you're right
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
I enjoy a good conspiracy theory, but there seldom is a good conspiracy theory.
It has yet to be explained to me (with a rational explanation) why having real terrorists crash planes into the WTC and Pentagon wouldn't have accomplished the exact same thing as the more exotic explanations:
Smuggled, secretly planted Plastique, Robot Planes, Drone Missiles.
Why do people always insist on fabricating the most convoluted conspiracies possible? If you want to implicate the U.S. government in these things, it makes much more sense to imagine the CIA helping real terrorists (who want to do the job anyway) to get the job done with legitimate means (actual real-life planes) rather than imagining the most complicated scheme possible.
--Anthony
Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The only people who believe this sort of moonbattery, are those that do not understand physics and metallurgy. Too bad for PN, I have co-workers who were in WTC7 when the planes hit WTC2. One of them had flaming debris come through his office window and destroy his desk (he had gone to the break room for coffee only moments before) WTC7 was fully involved. Since the construction was similar to WTC1 and 2, and fire felled them, it is logical to assume the fire also felled 7?
Remember, firefighting was halted in the aftermath of the towers falling, in favor or rescue attempts. WTC7 burned, unchecked for 3 or 4 hours before attempts were made to extinguish the blaze. All of those efforts had to take place outside the building since the commander on scene was uncertain how much damage 7 had taken from the towers falling. That made the firefighting ineffectual.
I'm disgusted with myself for contributing to PN's post count. Sorry PN, your signal to noise ratio is just way too low.
The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.
...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AnthonyT:
It has yet to be explained to me (with a rational explanation) why having real terrorists crash planes into the WTC and Pentagon wouldn't have accomplished the exact same thing as the more exotic explanations:
Cause the building likely wouldn't have come down - it still might have, but not THAT way, not straight down into it's own footprint, ever so neatly...
Case in point, the Murray Federal Building in Oklahoma was SUPPOSED to come down, apparently as a result of that weakass Ryder truck ANFO bomb, which factually didn't even DO most of the damage - and had the other explosives planted inside the building not malfunctioned, that WOULD have happened - only one of them did go off, and that is what caused most of the damage to the building, not the truckbomb, and in case anyone disputes that I have the freakin radio log intercepts which prove beyond all doubt there were additional explosives, mind you.
But the Murray Building *didn't* come down - now suppose it had, and someone like me who knows a little bit about this sorta thing started questioning how a truck bomb made with low order explosive from across the street did that kind of damage ?
We'd see almost the same situation we have here, where the official story is disputed back and forth by everyone from shills, to experts, to folks with an agenda, all the way down to outright nutters claiming aliens did it.
And that's the problem with holding to an "official story" that doesn't hold an ounce of water - it feeds these kind of things, in part deliberately cause that obfuscates the whole issue and allows persons responsible to stall off or avoid any real investigation or responsibility.
-Frem
I do not serve the Blind God.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
The problem is, no one has explained to my satisfaction why the building *had* to come down. Why a plane crashing into the building wasn't enough of an incentive to move American politics in the appropriate direction.
Events would have transpired much the same way with or without a total building collapse. And certainly having it collapse *neatly* sounds damn unimportant in staging a False Flag op.
There is an effort vs return part of this that makes no sense to me. All of these conspiracy theories crank the complexity to 11 without ever answering WHY?
If the goal of the op was merely to increase security theater, draw down our freedoms, and drive us to war, the complexity described is not needed. A CIA paid-for plane ramming woulda done the job just fine without the bells and whistles, no matter whether collapse was partial, complete, neat, or messy.
--Anthony
Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ignorant fucking sods. The buildings fell in their own footprint because they collapsed due to gravity. The earth is down. Straight down. Nothing will be going sideways when nothing is pushing or pulling sideways.
Take a physics class. It's not that hard.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME