Bomber stopped by FBI in Portland
POSTED BY: whozit
UPDATED: Thursday, December 2, 2010 17:42
VIEWED: 3080
PAGE 1 of 4
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fbi_thwarts_terro
rist_bombing.html
The TSA should be grabbing the balls of people who look like him, instead of kids and old ladys
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
A Somali born teenager ?
Doesn't fit the profile... 
" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nope, AUrap is right. This doesn't sound plausible.....
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Further investigation reveals the guy is dumber than a brick, and was lead by the hand by FBI "handlers" step by step all the way - he couldn't even FIND the goddamn target zone without one in the van with him to give directions... so from day one this whole "plot" was handed to him piece by piece by the feds.
Oh yes, and where oh where did he get the "bomb" ?
Why, the same place Ramzi Youssef did!
Quote:
But the bomb was a fake and had been provided to Mohamud as part of a long-term sting by undercover FBI agents.
Of course, they gave Youssef a REAL bomb, and soon enough, as Judges get sick of playing along and charging these morons for essentially being dupes...
In order to keep up the booga-booga and make the charges stick, the FBI might once again resort to handing off real bombs, which worked out SO well in 1993, did it not ?
Or worse, get *played* by a real terrorist who plays dumb, milks them for equipment and intel, then kills the FBI infiltrator and makes a real strike with resources our so-called protectors provided him.
The gravest threat to our national security...
Is our National Security.
-Frem
I do not serve the Blind God.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Further investigation reveals the guy is dumber than a brick, and was lead by the hand by FBI "handlers" step by step all the way - he couldn't even FIND the goddamn target zone without one in the van with him to give directions... so from day one this whole "plot" was handed to him piece by piece by the feds.
Oh yes, and where oh where did he get the "bomb" ?
Why, the same place Ramzi Youssef did!Quote:
But the bomb was a fake and had been provided to Mohamud as part of a long-term sting by undercover FBI agents.
Of course, they gave Youssef a REAL bomb, and soon enough, as Judges get sick of playing along and charging these morons for essentially being dupes...
In order to keep up the booga-booga and make the charges stick, the FBI might once again resort to handing off real bombs, which worked out SO well in 1993, did it not ?
Or worse, get *played* by a real terrorist who plays dumb, milks them for equipment and intel, then kills the FBI infiltrator and makes a real strike with resources our so-called protectors provided him.
The gravest threat to our national security...
Is our National Security.
-Frem
I do not serve the Blind God.
Blah Blah.....the guy wrote a piece in "inspire" try that on your dead leg! "Inspire" you ask? look it up peg leg and get a clue........
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/50771809-68/portland-fbi-bomb-moham
ud.html.csp
Quote:
Some residents of this famously liberal city are unnerved, not only by a plot to bomb an annual Christmas tree-lighting ceremony last week but also by the police tactics in the case.
They questioned whether federal agents crossed the line by training 19-year-old Somali-American Mohamed O. Mohamud to blow up a bomb, giving him $3,000 cash to rent an apartment and providing him with a fake bomb.
The FBI affidavit “was a picture painted to make the suspect sound like a dangerous terrorist,” said Portland photographer Rich Burroughs. “I don’t think it’s clear at all that this person would have ever had access to even a fake bomb if not for the FBI.”
So, looks like the real Terrorist training camps are in Langley and Quantico, like I been sayin all along, neh ?
-F
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/50771809-68/portland-fbi-bomb-moham
ud.html.cspQuote:
Some residents of this famously liberal city are unnerved, not only by a plot to bomb an annual Christmas tree-lighting ceremony last week but also by the police tactics in the case.
They questioned whether federal agents crossed the line by training 19-year-old Somali-American Mohamed O. Mohamud to blow up a bomb, giving him $3,000 cash to rent an apartment and providing him with a fake bomb.
The FBI affidavit “was a picture painted to make the suspect sound like a dangerous terrorist,” said Portland photographer Rich Burroughs. “I don’t think it’s clear at all that this person would have ever had access to even a fake bomb if not for the FBI.”
So, looks like the real Terrorist training camps are in Langley and Quantico, like I been sayin all along, neh ?
-F
Since I just don't think like these guys, can you run down the reasons why TPTB want to keep us frightened of terrorists? It seems to me that a happy populace would be easier to manage than a frightened, angry one. But I can only guess what their motives are.
Scifi movie music + Firefly dialogue clips, 24 hours a day - http://www.scifiradio.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
If the powers can convince you that you need to surrender your resources and your freedoms to them in order to secure your safety, they win.
Happy people have no motivation to surrender anything to the government. Only frightened people do.
--Anthony
Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AnthonyT:
Hello,
If the powers can convince you that you need to surrender your resources and your freedoms to them in order to secure your safety, they win.
Happy people have no motivation to surrender anything to the government. Only frightened people do.
Thx Anthony - obviously I'm a skeptic but I'm always open to the best explanation. So far though I don't feel like I've given up any resources in the "War on Terror." I also don't feel like they are after my wallet - not sure they would need terrorism to do that anyway. So what resources?
As far as surrendering my freedoms, what freedoms and what do they want with them? Pat downs at the airport - seems like all govs are asking for that so hard for me to cite my gov as being out of synch or making unusual demands on that front.
Scifi movie music + Firefly dialogue clips, 24 hours a day - http://www.scifiradio.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sadly Pizmo, your statement is indicative of a fairly popular opinion.
Of course, your definiton of a resource is the key.
Is freedom a resource? The Patriot Act certainly took plenty of that away, as well as many smaller measures.
How about the opportunity cost of what the TRILLIONS we spent in Iraq could have meant for our country, our infrastructure, our economy?
I see these as resources we have certainly forfeited in the name of the War on Terror
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME