Korean War?
POSTED BY: AnthonyT
UPDATED: Saturday, September 6, 2025 14:25
VIEWED: 1834
PAGE 2 of 3
Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Does this mean M*A*S*H is coming back?
Mercifully, Hot Lips has long since retired.
" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:
Originally posted by pizmobeach:Quote:
Pyongyang accused the South of firing first. The Southern military said it had conducted exercises but shelling was directed away from the North."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11818005
Interesting admission that last bit, eh? Makes it sound like the South fired first but with slightly bad aim. Funny how that aim was at NK.
What about the South saying it fired away from the North makes you think " Interesting admission " ??
Why even admit that you were testing in the area? And did they realize that by doing so just about everyone would come to the same conclusion that we did = weak excuse and Provocation? Just seems like the kind of thing that either way, you let someone else bring up first.
Scifi movie music + Firefly dialogue clips, 24 hours a day - http://www.scifiradio.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If you've got nothing to hide, why lie ?
S.Korea admitted they were testing. They're fully in their right to test.
What's the point in denying it?
It wasn't the South that shelled another country, it was the North.
What's the fuss over this ?
" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Interesting how some people are quick to mistrust the government in some ways, yet in others are quite happy to believe it's in the right, when a conspiracy might just as well exist as in other matters.
Me, I don't think it takes much to have either rside go after the other or provoke the other. I don't think it's a conspiracy engendered by our government for the simple reason that our government has stretched its military and has quite enough things to deal with right now, but I could be wrong.
How we'll DEAL with it is a far more important question, for me.![]()
Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I find this more interesting:Quote:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/11/23/cronin.korea.artillery/index.htm
Why did this happen?
Tension has been running particularly high in the Korean peninsula after the March 26 sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan. Tuesday's incident, however, is one of the most serious that has occurred in recent years.
The hostilities come as North Korea is undergoing transition -- the ailing and reclusive leader Kim Jong Il is believed to be in the process of transferring power to his son Kim Jong Un. Some analysts believe upcoming internal changes have prompted North Korea to flex its military muscle in recent days.
Tuesday's violence was also preceded by the revelation of a North Korean uranium enrichment program.
Has this happened before?
Yes, Yeonpyeong Island has come under attack before. Last January, South Korea reported that the North had fired shells that fell in waters north of the Northern Limit Line, the de facto inter-Korean maritime border.
North Korea wants that border redrawn farther south.
Over the past six decades, small-scale skirmishes have flared repeatedly along both land and sea borders as each state aims to reunify the peninsula according to its own terms and system of government. Deadly naval clashes occurred along the demarcation line in 1999, 2002 and 2009.
Will the two nations go to war?
South Korea put its military on high alert following Tuesday's exchange of fire. But whether that will translate into further military action is impossible to predict.
Events in the past few months suggested a slight thawing of icy relations.
North and South Korea had begun discussions on the possible resumption of reunions of family members separated by the Korean war and North Korea has requested military talks. In early September, the South offered food aid to the impoverished North for the first time in three years.
Given the closed nature of North Korean politics, it's hard to tell what changes the new leadership of Kim Jong Un will entail or whether re-engagement is on the table. Another wild card is the influence of China; some South Koreans fear a Chinese takeover in the event of a North Korean collapse.
Some analysts viewed Tuesday's exchange as North Korea flexing its military muscle in the light of its leadership transition. Others said it was related to the nuclear issue.
How will nuclear talks be affected?
Washington accuses Pyongyang of running a secret uranium-based nuclear program. The United States, along with the two Koreas, Russia, Japan and China, have been involved in what is called the Six Party Talks.
But those talks have been slow and arduous and in limbo since 2008. And after the revelation of the North Korean uranium enrichment facility a few days ago, the resumption of talks seemed in jeopardy.
Stephen Bosworth, the U.S. special envoy on North Korean denuclearization, said Tuesday's hostilities will prove a further obstacle.
Choi Jin-wook, senior researcher at the Korea Institute of National Unification, said the North is "frustrated with Washington's response to their uranium program and they think that Washington has almost given up on negotiations with North Korea."
"I think they realize they can't expect anything from Washington or Seoul for several months, so I think they made the provocation," Choi said.
l?hpt=T1 Quote:
The first responsibility of the United States must remain the preservation of deterrence from outright return to war. The attacks leave the alliance with few good options for reprisal without risking a far less desirable renewal of conflict.
The United States must work with South Korea to bolster deterrence, check North Korean aggression and be ready to turn it back, but only if absolutely necessary. We will also have to operate without fully understanding the power at play in North Korea.
This year has already been a deadly one as an ailing Kim Jong Il accelerated the likely dynastic transition in power to an ill-
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
If you've got nothing to hide, why lie ?
S.Korea admitted they were testing. They're fully in their right to test.
What's the point in denying it?
By the same token, maybe North Korea was testing as well. Maybe they were testing whether or not their artillery could hit that particular island. The results are in: IT CAN!
This Space For Rent!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Barry's going to with that he and his telepromter had stayed in the Senate.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NK tests nuclear weapons ? meh
NK tests long rang rockets ? meh.
NK sinks a SK frigate ? meh
But S. Korea tests some artillery shells, in the open water?
PROVOCATION !!
ATTACK !!
( Hillary's 3AM call is sounding awfully prophetic...
)
" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Because we don't know any other way to react...
U.S. to Send Carrier for Joint Exercises Off Korea
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/25/world/asia/25korea.html?_r=1&hp
"President Obama and South Korea’s president agreed Tuesday night to hold joint military exercises as a first response to North Korea’s deadly shelling of a South Korean military installation, as both countries struggled for the second time this year to keep a North Korean provocation from escalating into war.
The exercise will include sending the aircraft carrier George Washington and a number of accompanying ships into the region, both to deter further attacks by the North and to signal to China that unless it reins in its unruly ally it will see an even larger American presence in the vicinity.
The decision came after Mr. Obama attended the end of an emergency session in the White House Situation Room and then emerged to call President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea to express American solidarity and talk about a coordinated response." ... in which Mr. Obama was TOLD what to do next by the Joint Chiefs...
So we'll have our own floating group of targets there just in case (maybe "we hope?") the North "accidentally" gets trigger happy.
You all been great, I'm off to the stow to buy can goods. Sell all your stocks, the sky is falling, etc, etc...
Scifi movie music + Firefly dialogue clips, 24 hours a day - http://www.scifiradio.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"President Obama and South Korea’s president agreed Tuesday night to hold joint military exercises as a first response to North Korea’s deadly shelling of a South Korean military installation, as both countries struggled for the second time this year to keep a North Korean provocation from escalating into war.
Really?
THIS is 'hope and change' ??
Yeah. This should go well.
" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME