Real World Event Discussions

Here's what we SHOULD be doing:

POSTED BY: Niki2
UPDATED: Sunday, September 12, 2010 16:45
VIEWED: 2767
PAGE 2 of 3

Friday, September 10, 2010 5:06 AM

Dear Niki,
Please continue hogging RWED. I prefer regularly seeing your relevant topics than the insanity some posters have felt the need to flood here.
Thank you,
Lisa

P.S. If I were to change anything, it would only be the font you have chosen as one of your distinguishing characteristics. However, relevance in Comic Sans is still relevance, so I cannot complain overmuch.


HRWATPWRTCITG

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 10, 2010 5:59 AM

At least it's not papyrus.

/Internet joke

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 10, 2010 7:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:

And those superstitious looneys in the middle east? Again I say, bombard them from the air with Playboys & Penthouses. Make sure every populated area has been blanketed! Kids will grow up to want to SEE & TOUCH the opposite sex regardless of their inane parents' teachings! It could be the seeding of a new & erotically freed Middle East!!!!




No, silly! The extremist nuts are already plenty erotically freed within the bounds of (underage, multiple-wived) marriage, I suspect. They have plenty of naked when they want it. They just don't like sharing.

Therefor: Throw down equality-porn for the girls! Drop Pippi Longstocking books on every village! Just don't... hit the kids on the head and kill them.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 10, 2010 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Quote:

they'd like that, actually. We'd be falling right in line with what they're all about. And that's what they want
Then we're playing right into their hands by ignoring the Constitution and engaging in Anti-Islamic rhetoric, violence and racism. Don't you get that? If we behave with intolerance, we are one step closer to BEING like them.



Only that's not what is happening.

Quote:



I know you don't get it, but I'll say it anyway...
Quote:

The US and the rest of the Western world has shown more tolerance, more generosity and more freedom to non Christians than the Mullahs could shake a stick at.


Obviously you don't care to read facts presented to you. I just presented you with facts from different countries showing the tolerance of Muslims...about the same time we were slaughtering them in the name of Jesus...



We've never killed a single one " in the name of JEEEsus ". I have no idea what planet you're on.

Quote:


There is NO comparison between being "blind" to what terrorists do (which we NEVER should be) and being blind to the fact that not all Muslims ARE terrorists and being hateful and intolerant of a religion.

There's no "actively resisting" anything in destruction of people, property, and denial of the very rights America STANDS for! We ARE actively resisting THE TERRORISTS, our soldiers are doing the very best. But it's not active OR passive resistance to do the things that are going on in our country today.



Again, there's no destruction of property, of people, and no one's "RIGHTS" are being denied.

Quote:


Essentially, by damaging real mosques, denying them permits, etc., praying and being who they are is precisely what we're not allowing.

There are no "rights" of the those opposed to the COMMUNITY CENTER which are being infringed upon; the ONLY rights being infringed upon are property rights and freedom of religion, by opposing it. That you can't see that is incredible, especially given how much you and your friends scream about the inviolability of the Constitution!



No one has denied any permits to the Victory Mosque / Cordoba project. The opposition you speak of is free speech, and is a constitutional right. YOU'RE supporting the suppression of that right. Exercising that right in no way denies another person of their freedom of religion.

Also, your little abbreviated tour of ' religious tolerance' in history and around the world was cute. It was also nonsensical, by failing to address the real basic RIGHTS we extend and most other nations don't, but still cute. Sort of.




NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 10, 2010 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
At least it's not papyrus.

/Internet joke



Blasphemer!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 10, 2010 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RiverDancer:
Dear Niki,
Please continue hogging RWED. I prefer regularly seeing your relevant topics than the insanity some posters have felt the need to flood here.
Thank you,
Lisa

P.S. If I were to change anything, it would only be the font you have chosen as one of your distinguishing characteristics. However, relevance in Comic Sans is still relevance, so I cannot complain overmuch.


HRWATPWRTCITG




Yes. More of this.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 10, 2010 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
And then make them PAY a superstition tax on top of that.


That would be ok if you charged the same fee for people not having faith...call it the 'no soul tax'.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.
"I would rather not ignore your contributions." Niki2, 2010.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 10, 2010 2:42 PM

Hello Niki,

The Constitution that protects the rights of Muslim worshipers in America also protects the rights of people who want to decry the rights of Muslim worshipers in America.

So, people are very free to protest the rights of other people, just so long as they limit their activity to speech.

As long as all those who speak out against Muslims and Muslim construction limit themselves to communication, and restrain themselves to that level, they can proceed to display intolerance, fear, anger, and even hatred. They can take verbal revenge for the less impotent intolerance of other nations. They can boil with envy for other nations that allow physical acts against unwanted persons. They can shout and shake their fists in agonizing comparative powerlessness.

Our citizens have every right to mimic the actions of the extremists they despise, so long as that mimicry falls short of violence or legal discrimination.

The Constitution preserves the right to speak against Constitutional philosophies. It preserves the right to speak against freedom. It preserves the right to seethe with intolerant emotions and to spew those emotions in myriad forms of speech.

...And if anyone seeks to act on their intolerant speech without performing a Constitutional amendment, that same Constitution will protect the people they have claimed as their enemies.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 10, 2010 3:51 PM

Wow River, you continue to astonish me. At this point, I don't care if you're a sockpuppet pretending to be nice; just having you BE nice here is worth its weight in gold. Mind, I'm not claiming you ARE one, just mentioning it as people have said they use sockpuppets to "play nice" sometimes. I have decided to take each person at their word and not care beyond that.

I thank you for your kind words, and again express my appreciation for your change of heart. As to comic sans, I've used it on every forum I've ever been on just 'cuz I like the look of it...and yes, given my tastes, I'm lucky it ISN'T Papyrus! ;o)

I don't mean to "hog" anything--I was a bad girl yesterday and stayed here all DAY, which I don't usually do, nor do I come back after I'm finished in the morning. Waste of time; sometimes I just get hooked into trying to offer facts (like I said, waste of time often) and looking stuff up to see if my points are valid and back them up is educational and interesting.

The remark didn't bother me, by the way, I'm immue to that stuff now, but I thank you nonetheless for your kindness.

Agent, polygamy is no longer practiced in Muslim countries, as far as I know--definitely not in Afghanistan! MOST followers of Islam treat their women with respect, according to the Qu'ran and the word of Allah. Even when there was, it was only the rich who had multiple women (you know, called harems?), but that was centuries ago.

Shees, Raptor, there you go again, flaunting your ignorance.

Quote:

engaging in Anti-Islamic rhetoric, violence and racism
is PRECISELY what is happening. You can't argue the rhetoric; as to violence, when Christian cursaders captured the Jerusalem, they started general masscre of Jews and Mulsims; even the people inside the temple were not spared. It is said that "The knees of horses were drenched with blood of dead bodies inside the temple area".

But when Aubi recaptured the area, he forgave all. He let the crusaders to go to their countries and all other Jews and Christians living there were given freedom of worship.

As to current violence, in 2008-2009
Quote:

Mosques and other places of worship have been particular targets of vandalism and arson. In some incidents, religious texts have also been desecrated and destroyed.
Back in 2001, A 49-year-old Indian gas station owner in Arizona and a Pakistani Muslim sore owner in Texas were shot dead.

There have been recorded more than 300 incidents of anti-Muslim harassment, threats, discrimination and violence.

Quote:

Most recently, a mosque in Madera, California was vandalized. This marked the third incident of vandalism at the mosque that the Madera County Sheriff's Department has started investigating as hate crimes.

Earlier, a brick was thrown at the center and another sign with, 'No temple for the god of terrorism,' was placed on the property.

You're also conveniently forgetting the recent knife attack on a cabby in New York, I assume?

I swear, I'm starting to think whoever said you revel in your ignorance is right, or else it's deliberate blindness to the facts happening around you, dunno which. Or else an attempt to trigger; rather than going after me personally (which you managed to do as well), stating obvious lies.

I don’t deny anyone’s freedom of SPEECH against the community center--I abhor it, just as I abhor the bible burning; I’m against it, because of what it says about us; and I’m exercising MY freedom of speech by speaking against it. But in the end, it is the violent anti-Islamic fervor sweeping our nation that I’m speaking out against. As to permit denial:

Chicago:
Quote:

We're hearing from the local chamber of commerce and alderman's office that the city has denied a special use permit that would allow a mosque to replace a shut down hot dog grill.
Kentucky:
Quote:

A group of Somali natives petitioning to open a new mosque in Mayfield has been denied a conditional use permit by city officials. This is the first time the

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 10, 2010 4:31 PM

"I would like to believe that’s true, but unfortunately, it hasn’t been so far."

Hello,

I am ashamed and angered at this news, and I sincerely hope these permits were denied for legitimate zoning reasons and not for reasons of faith.

I know that the staunch conservative voices on this board will unanimously speak out against any trampling of Constitutional Rights and Civil Liberties. Momentarily, their voices will fill these digital halls with resounding condemnation. Surely, the actual real-life trampling of the Constitution right now will anger them more than any theoretical trampling of the Constitution under some worst-case-scenario imagined future implementation of Sharia Law.

You just watch, Niki. I'll lead the charge, as the first conservative voice speaking in defense of the Constitution.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME