Are Homosexuals Psychopaths?
POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Tuesday, October 21, 2025 06:17
VIEWED: 2761
PAGE 1 of 3
DSM Diagnostic Service Manual, Psychology and Psychiatry labeled homosexuality as "Gender Identity Disorder"
http://www.moneyteachers.org/Homosexual.psychopaths.html
Quote:
20% of the male gay population will be infected with HIV in the next 12 months. If a man continues to practice homosexuality, he has a 100% probability of contracting HIV over a 5 year period.

"You can't put a price on good pussy."
-Pam, Archer, The Rock
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You fail basic statistics, John.
A 20% chance (even if I accepted your figures as anywhere near valid) means you have a 20% chance every time you have unprotected sex with someone different. What it DOESN'T mean is that if you have sex with 5 different people, you have a 100% chance of catching AIDS.
It's similar to weather forecasting. If there's a 20% chance of rain five days in a row, that doesn't mean there's a 100% chance you got rain. That means you had five days in a row where each day, you had a 20% chance.
Honestly, your idiocy about these things knows no bounds.
AURaptor's Greatest Hits:
Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.
Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Kwicko you forgot to account for the fact that every time the sex partner doesn't have Aids, he is eliminated from the overall pool. So if for example 20% of one million gay men have Aids, that would be two hundred thousand with Aids. After the first time the person has sex that doesn't end in infection the number of potential new partners without aids drops by one. Now the probability for getting Aids on the next encounter becomes 200,000/999,999x100=20.00002%. Then for each successive encounter the odds of getting Aids increases slightly. Given the large pool of potential partners, a large number of partners would be required in order to significantly increase the odds.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by piratenews:
Are Homosexuals Psychopaths?
No more so that you.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yes, every last one of them. As are jews, the welsh, blacks, whites, the left-handed, women, and people who run with scissors.
It's a crazy world we live in. CRAZY!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Fascinating formula. Applying the math, what do you think the chances are that Fred Phelps is HIV positive? The problem is that there is insufficient data. I cannot account for X, the number of gay encounters.
By my calculations, next time you have gay sex, you have a 20% chance of catching the bug, and a 100% chance of enjoying it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
One word - Africa.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
You fail basic statistics, John.
Not my stats. If true, Bush/Clinton/Bush/Obama would be dead by now.
Gotta factor in the censored VIP cure for HIV. Ask Magic Johnson.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Johnson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiretroviral_drug
http://boydgraves.com
Politicians share traits with psychopaths
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=10917

www.johnnygosch.com
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Filthy racist sexually-obsessed homophobic xenophobic asshole; that link is disgusting and has nothing to do with reality.
People can go on having PROTECTED sex forever and not necessarily get HIV...those are CLAIMS made by that horrible website. HETEROS can get HIV from having unprotectd sex. Doesn't belong on this forum, it's not news, it's not truth, it's crap.
And the DSM-IV DOES NOT list it as what you said:Quote:
That's for people with PROBLEMS; homosexuality is not a psychiatric problem. Stop lying.
The very first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) classified homosexuality as a sexual deviation, as did DSM-II in 1968. However, in December of 1973, the DSM-II was modified by the Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), who voted to eliminate the general category of homosexuality, and replace it with sexual orientation disturbance.
As Dr. Jon Meyer notes (see Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 4th ed., eds. Kaplan & Sadock), "...this change reflected the point of view that homosexuality was to be considered a mental disorder only if it was subjectively disturbing to the individual. The decision of the APA Board...took place in the context of new sociological data, biological inferences, and de-emphasis of psychoanalytic observations.
The very first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) classified homosexuality as a sexual deviation, as did DSM-II in 1968. However, in December of 1973, the DSM-II was modified by the Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), who voted to eliminate the general category of homosexuality, and replace it with sexual orientation disturbance.
As Dr. Jon Meyer notes (see Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 4th ed., eds. Kaplan & Sadock), "...this change reflected the point of view that homosexuality was to be considered a mental disorder only if it was subjectively disturbing to the individual. The decision of the APA Board...took place in the context of new sociological data, biological inferences, and de-emphasis of psychoanalytic observations.
The DSMs change as science and culture evolved. Psychiatry will never be a perfect science; SCIENCE will never be a perfect science; even just the number of people misdiagnosed with psychitric disorders or the wrong disorder all the time is pretty hefty. Stating old data as fact is a pure and simple lie, just like all the rest of what you posted.
Sorry everyone else; this is the first thing I read when I came here this morning and it sickened me, as so MUCH of what PN puts up. When it's blatant lies, I'll call it what it is.![]()
Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
signing off
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
Filthy racist sexually-obsessed homophobic xenophobic asshole; that link is disgusting and has nothing to do with reality.
People can go on having PROTECTED sex forever and not necessarily get HIV...those are CLAIMS made by that horrible website. HETEROS can get HIV from having unprotectd sex. Doesn't belong on this forum, it's not news, it's not truth, it's crap.
And the DSM-IV DOES NOT list it as what you said:Quote:That's for people with PROBLEMS; homosexuality is not a psychiatric problem. Stop lying.
The very first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) classified homosexuality as a sexual deviation, as did DSM-II in 1968. However, in December of 1973, the DSM-II was modified by the Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), who voted to eliminate the general category of homosexuality, and replace it with sexual orientation disturbance.
As Dr. Jon Meyer notes (see Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 4th ed., eds. Kaplan & Sadock), "...this change reflected the point of view that homosexuality was to be considered a mental disorder only if it was subjectively disturbing to the individual. The decision of the APA Board...took place in the context of new sociological data, biological inferences, and de-emphasis of psychoanalytic observations.
The very first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) classified homosexuality as a sexual deviation, as did DSM-II in 1968. However, in December of 1973, the DSM-II was modified by the Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), who voted to eliminate the general category of homosexuality, and replace it with sexual orientation disturbance.
As Dr. Jon Meyer notes (see Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 4th ed., eds. Kaplan & Sadock), "...this change reflected the point of view that homosexuality was to be considered a mental disorder only if it was subjectively disturbing to the individual. The decision of the APA Board...took place in the context of new sociological data, biological inferences, and de-emphasis of psychoanalytic observations.
The DSMs change as science and culture evolved. Psychiatry will never be a perfect science; SCIENCE will never be a perfect science; even just the number of people misdiagnosed with psychitric disorders or the wrong disorder all the time is pretty hefty. Stating old data as fact is a pure and simple lie, just like all the rest of what you posted.
Sorry everyone else; this is the first thing I read when I came here this morning and it sickened me, as so MUCH of what PN puts up. When it's blatant lies, I'll call it what it is.
Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
signing off
Nice name calling monkey girl. Of course gay people have a disorder. They are biological malfunctions. They are Abominations of man. They are almost always beaten and molested as children causing them to seek refuge in the anus of another, how can that be normal? How does that make sense? I'm not saying they don't have the right to be anal addicts ...I'm just saying it is odd. Let us take Kwicko as an example here. Do you think he would like to prod in the pudding if he wasn't raped repeatedly by an uncle as a child?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME