Other Science Fiction Series

Just saw Terminator: Salvation, and...

POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Sunday, July 11, 2010 00:57
VIEWED: 6444
PAGE 1 of 6

Sunday, June 27, 2010 10:48 PM

By gum, I kinda liked it!
It was like, really REALLY good fanfic! In no way the equal of the first two, but light years better than the mess that was T3 IMO.
I avoided until now, but lack-O-new stuff made me buy it on the cheap out of curiosity.
I recommend a rental or cheap buy here!

Anyone else think it was worth a viewing?


The T-1000 Chrisisall


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, June 27, 2010 10:51 PM

...whozit can wait till it gets to cable

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, June 27, 2010 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:
...whozit can wait till it gets to cable

No *pausie-to-get-the-snackie*!!!


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, June 27, 2010 11:30 PM

I thought it was F^>?%>NG horrible.

I'm a Terminator snob though. In my opinion the first one was phenomenal, and the second one was slightly above average.

-------------------------------------------------

70's TV FOREVER

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, June 27, 2010 11:42 PM

I thought it was pretty okay for what it was. But the way it was supposed to be sounds much more interesting.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The country is making a big mistake not teaching kids to cook and raise a garden and build fires.
-Loretta Lynn
Smarts are the brains that make America think.
-Will Sasso as Steven Segal, MadTV

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, June 28, 2010 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by OPPYH:
I thought it was F^>?%>NG horrible.

So what did you think of the third flick?
Quote:



In my opinion the first one was phenomenal

agreed
Quote:

the second one was slightly above average.
I thought it was almost the equal of the first, but in a very different way. However, I still admit to having problems with the "liquid metal" technology....
BUT, T:S avoided that! It's like, you can watch T, and then T:S & skip the others!

The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, June 28, 2010 1:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by OPPYH:
I thought it was F^>?%>NG horrible.



I'll second that. It's a terrible movie, possibly the worst "summer blockbuster" I've ever seen (not to mention how poorly it stacks up against regular, better movies).

www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, June 28, 2010 1:15 AM

I'm with you CiA, I thought it was alright.

But that COULD be because I was expecting it to be HORRIBLE and got dragged along by friends. And it was after I'd just seen Transformers 2.

So in comparison, it seemed pretty good.
I think I was just pleasantly surprised.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, June 28, 2010 1:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigRichard:
I'm with you CiA, I thought it was alright.


I liked that it seemed respectful of the source material, while delivering some new stuff.
Plus: CGI Arnie was cool!


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, June 28, 2010 2:50 AM

I probably would've enjoyed it more if I hadn't been comparing it to TSCC and constantly wishing Cameron and/or Derek would show up. . .

-----
We applied the cortical electrodes but were unable to get a neural reaction from either patient.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME