Who here would be up for another Indiana Jones flick?
POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Thursday, March 17, 2016 08:04
VIEWED: 6920
PAGE 2 of 3
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:Quote:Clearly you do not subscribe to string theory.
Originally posted by RahlMaclaren:
I mean, "...space between spaces."? What?
That's cool.
The inter-dimensional Chrisisall
How can there be space inside the space, when there's already space there?
Hold on, lemme do the math here -- nothin' into nothin', carry the nothin'...
*brain hurts*
I guess, I'm just old school.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle
If two objects can't occupy the same space at the same time, how can two different spaces?
If space is all the same (nothin'), wouldn't they just join together like drops of water? (Dude, that's deep)
We've got enough in this universe to worry about, let alone an infinite number (or 11) other ones.
Oh, hell, why not. Bring 'em on!
--------------------------------------------------
Find here the Serenity you seek. -Tara Maclay
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
No they should definitely not do another one, but I'm sure they will as the last one made a bucket load of money. They shouldn't have done the last one or least they should have done it many years earlier when the cast was younger and they had a different script.
I would settle for a reboot/re-imagining with Nathan as a younger Indy.
But we have no worries. Ford said in the interview that he and Spielberg are just waiting for Lucas to get a script together that they can all agree on. Seeing how long the last one took to be agreed on I think you all may have a long, long wait.
I understand that the 4th film has it's fans but this is one series that will forever remain a trilogy for me.
"I don't believe in suicide, but if you'd like to try it it might cheer me up to watch."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:LOL, how so? Based on reviews to tell you how to perceive it?
Punk.
Nay, not the reviews, I saw it my own self. It WAS horrid.
Quote:
Child.
Things change.
In your next life you need to be aware of this.
OR... you'll be back sucking up to the familiar status quo yet again.
Some things ought not be tampered with. After 20 years, the Simpson kids are still the same age...they're ageless. So should it be for Marion Ravenwood!
The T.Rex they call JANE!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Nay, not the reviews, I saw it my own self. It WAS horrid.
It wasn't really horrid. Better than Temple. Not as good as Crusade. None of them hold a candle to Raiders. Skull's primary flaw was the pacing. The pacing and that mind numbingly stupid refrigerator bit.
I'd see another Indiana Jones movie but it would have to have Nazis in it. Indy doesn't really work without cartoon Nazi thugs to kick around.
David
'Begone, sugar-free candy antichrist!' - Nathan Rabin.
'Geeks can't admit that anything worthwhile was invented before 1981. Soon, "making cocoa" will be called "milk hacking."' - Lore Sjoberg
http://xkcd.com/386/
"Don't worry. Captain Hammer will save us." - Penny.
I has myspace - http://www.myspace.com/daveshayneforpresident
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yup. I'm up for another one. I like the idea of following an older hero for a change...
There are enough younger action stars out there making their own brand of adventure films... And they're nothing like the quality of the Indy flicks. If one can come along and put up a good enough challenge to Indiana Jones then fine - Indy should stand aside. However until that day - long live Indy.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The last one was kinda a "passing of the torch" story; I can see Mutt and Indy working together as Mutt takes on more and more of the adventuring (but not all; Indy's not quite done yet).
And the change in tone is inevitable; they're into the Cold War now. 1950s B-movies. The days of 1920s adventure serials are over --the only way to go back to the "cartoon Nazis" would be with a prequel or reboot, and, as much as I love Nathan, Harrison Ford is Indiana Jones.
-----
We applied the cortical electrodes but were unable to get a neural reaction from either patient.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by TheSomnambulist:
If one can come along and put up a good enough challenge to Indiana Jones then fine
Rick O'connell in the Mummy films?
Nah... not the same calibur IMO.
The laughing Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull would have been fine...if not for Shia Lebouf.
His acting was horrendous.
That being said, yes I'm down for another sequel. As long as George Lucas stays away from it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I'm not his biggest fan, but I actually liked him in Crystal Skull. Go figure.
Originally posted by OPPYH:
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull would have been fine...if not for Shia Lebouf.
His acting was horrendous.
The laughing Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Bytemite:
Quote:
It's probably time for Harrison Ford to start to take up the role of narrator for a younger him, or stay at home mentor for Mud. I'm surprised he didn't get injured while they were filming the last movie.
Ironic you should say that, as Harrison actually injured himself on the first film. To such an extent that Spielberg and Lucas were thinking they might have to replace him.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME