Rudy Giuliani: 'We had no domestic attacks under Bush'
POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Monday, August 26, 2024 19:28
VIEWED: 3705
PAGE 1 of 3
On ABC News, coverup artist Stephanopoulos of course said nothing to correct him...
http://rawstory.com/2010/01/giuliani-no-domestic-attacks-under-bush/
And no questions about Rudy's kosher police chief Bernie Kerik jailed for felonies on 9/11, picked as Fatherland Security director by Jr Bush.
youtube.com/watch?v=Pt4Nh1BjPAw
Nor about Rudy's Mafia family of hijackers, robbers and hitmen.
http://www.rense.com/general79/guil.htm
Quote:
"What he should be doing is following the right things that Bush did," Giuliani said. "One of the right things he did was treat this as a war on terror -- we had no domestic attacks under Bush; we had one under Obama."
The former mayor criticized Obama for opting to handle the alleged bomber's case in civilian court, essentially saying that the problem with civilian courts is that suspects are given lawyers.
"If you put someone in a civilian court, within a short period of time a lawyer is appointed and the person shuts up," he remarked. "If you have a person in the military system, you can question him endlessly for as long as you have to to make sure you've got the full scope of information."
"I'm very hopeful that President Obama turned a corner yesterday," he said. "He first used the words, thank goodness, 'War on Terror.'"
www.hellonewyorkcity.com/art/RobertLederman.Cfm
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
BREAKING NEWS: DRUNK NYPD chief of police guilty of hit-and-run against pregnant woman
January 8, 2010
Howard Safir, a New York City police commissioner during the Giuliani administration, backed his sport utility vehicle into a pregnant woman on the Upper East Side on Friday afternoon and then drove away, the police said.
The woman, Joanne M. Valarezo, 30, of the Bronx, was not knocked down and was not seriously injured in the accident, which occurred at 2:25 p.m. in front of 1418 Third Avenue, the authorities said. They said she was able to jot down the license plate of Mr. Safir’s black 2009 Cadillac Escalade.
Ms. Valarezo was taken by ambulance to New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, where she was treated for a bruised shoulder and then released, the police said. Ms. Valarezo’s unborn child, nearing its seventh month, was apparently not affected, she later said.
Detectives from the 19th Precinct tracked Mr. Safir down, questioned him and “determined there is no criminality,” said a law enforcement official. The detectives determined that Mr. Safir was unaware that he had struck the woman before driving away, another law enforcement official said.
But the woman’s account raised questions about that.
The police said that Mr. Safir’s Escalade was double-parked, and hemmed in by two vehicles, and that the accident occurred as he was maneuvering out of that spot. It was not immediately clear how long it took detectives to reach Mr. Safir, who did not immediately return calls for comment left at his home in Annapolis, Md., and at an apartment he keeps in New York.
Mr. Safir, 67, was traveling with his wife when the accident occurred, the police said.
Ms. Valarezo said in a telephone interview on Friday night that she was on a break from her job at a doctor’s office and had gone to buy socks for her unborn child when she was hit.
“I was crossing the street in between cars and he hit reverse, and his female passenger screamed, ‘Are you not looking, there’s someone there,’ and as he was reversing, he hit me on my shoulder and my knee and the side of my stomach,” she said.
Then he started to drive away, she said.
“I confronted him and I said, ‘I’m pregnant. Did you not see?’ And he just disregarded that and kept going,” she said. She said if the passenger had not screamed, causing her to turn, she would been hurt more seriously.
Ms. Valarezo said her unborn baby, a boy, “is fine now, thank God. Everything looks good with my child.”
Ms. Valarezo said she did not recognize the driver.
Told he was a former police commissioner, she said: “Are you serious? Oh, my God, I did not know that. Wow. O.K., that would explain why all these detectives came to see me. I had detectives come see me in the hospital, and nobody told me who he was.”
She added: “I’m shaking now. So he has been caught?”
Told he was found but not charged, Ms. Valarezo said, “Really.”
Then she laughed.
She asked for his name, and when given it, said, “You would think that a man who abides by the law should follow it.”
Mr. Safir’s conduct when he was commissioner and his wife was in a minor car accident, in 1999, prompted questions. He sent two detectives to the home of a woman involved in the crash, who had provided a false name before leaving the scene.
In a later interview, Mr. Safir defended that response.
“When we found out that this woman lied, I wanted to find out who she was, to see if she was a threat to me or my family,” he said.
On Friday evening, Al McNeill, an aide at SafirRosetti, the security firm Mr. Safir now works at, said that he was unaware of the crash and that Mr. Safir was out of state.
Mr. Safir and Joseph R. Rosetti, a former director of security for IBM, founded the firm in 2001.
Mr. Safir’s tenure as police commissioner was occasionally controversial.
He was tapped in 1996 by Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani for the position after spending two years leading the Fire Department. The crime rate dropped during his tenure, and in 1998 killin
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What virtually ANY of that has to do with Guilliani claiming there were no terror attacks is beyond me. Still, I suppose better it's in one thread...which will hopefully now sink of its own weight.
Why anyone on earth or with half a brain should pay any attention to what Mr. "A noun, a verb and 911" has to say is beyond me.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
Why anyone on earth or with half a brain should pay any attention to what Mr. "A noun, a verb and 911" has to say is beyond me.
Evil flourishes when good folks do nothing.
Doesn't rewriting history by the victors concern you? Especially when the 9/11 terrorists are writing the US history books. Most Amerikans don't even know what year 9/11 was, or who was accused of the attacks.
Sir Rudy Giuliani Knight of the British Empire was in London during the 7/7 Bombings, since his company ran the contract for "bombing drills" at the same train stations at the exact same time. Just like Rudy was running a CIA "terrorism drill" of hijacked airliners crashing into WTC and Pentagon on 9/11/2001. More of Rudy's dope-dealin buddies go to jail.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=821
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=97643.5;wap2
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
What virtually ANY of that has to do with Guilliani claiming there were no terror attacks is beyond me. Still, I suppose better it's in one thread...which will hopefully now sink of its own weight.
Why anyone on earth or with half a brain should pay any attention to what Mr. "A noun, a verb and 911" has to say is beyond me.
Thing is, this wasn't a simple "misspeak" by Giuliani. Or if it was, it's contagious. I heard Dana Pirino say it during an appearance on Hannity's show a week or so ago, too.
And Hannity didn't even blink, much less call her on it. "There were no terrorist attacks during the Bush presidency" was her claim. And Hannity could have at least said, "Well, y'know, except for that one day..." or some such. Or brought up the Shoe Bomber (hey, if Cap'n Underpants is a terrorist, the Shoe Bomber must be as well, right?) or the anthrax attacks, right?
This is the Republicans' latest talking point, the idea that there was never any terrorist attack under Dubya. None. Nada. Never happened.
So tell me again what we're fighting, and why?
Mike
Work is the curse of the Drinking Class.
- Oscar Wilde
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Version of the quote I saw said something about there were no " domestic" terror attacks. Not sure what The Rudy uses for a definition-- not happening in America, didn't involve American citizens, didn't start in America, can't see how any definition you'd use would be true, except maybe, "didn't happen while a Democrat was President."
Only definition that matters is "wasn't really successful." Which also applies to Bush, about the Shoe Bomber.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
This is the Republicans' latest talking point, the idea that there was never any terrorist attack under Dubya. None. Nada. Never happened.
That's what hit me. They're rewriting the history books, literally. School textbooks already skip 9/11, and everything else that's a false flag.
We've always been at war with East Asia.
Emmanuel Goldstein runs Al Qaeda.
And Queen Rudy wears a dress.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by NewOldBrownCoat:
Only definition that matters is "wasn't really successful." Which also applies to Bush, about the Shoe Bomber.
Same Israeli security company let both bombers on the airliners. Not enough PETN to drop a plane. Mossod psyops.
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=41270
Quote:
Will the real Underwear Bomber please stand up?
Photo 1 Source and most widely used photo of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab
http://www.smh.com.au/world/britain-admits-jihadist-intelligence-failu
res-20100103-lnf3.html
Photo 2 from a Ghana News Site..detailing the purchase of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's plane ticket in Ghana
http://ghanabusinessnews.com/2009/12/28/failed-nigerian-bomber-bought-
air-ticket-from-ghana/
These are definitely two different human beings.
Is there a more sinister meaning to this story? Was the young man in Photo 1 a baby-faced patsy coerced into being the fall guy?
http://tnsonsofliberty.vox.com/library/post/will-the-real-underwear-bo
mber-please-stand-up.html
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
So tell me again what we're fighting, and why?
Why we're in Iraq and Afghanistan....
...So the American PTB can work toward securing oil/gas resources away from the other superpowers (Russia, China). Hmm, now what country is between Iraq and Afgha, and has oil? (Why do you think our Gov't has been messing with Iran for 50-ish years?)
...To keep unemployment levels down. If hundreds of thousands of people are busy, injured, or killed during a "war", that's less people to collect a check every month. Also, less people complaining that their job got shipped overseas.
...To add to the distractions so the PTB can loot the treasury (didn't the US have a Trillion dollar surplus in 2000? Mmm, yummy money!), fux with stocks (I know next to nothing about that stuff, but I do know nothing vanishes without a trace) and deregulate for max. profits (tax cuts for billionaires, etc.).
--------------------------------------------------
Find here the Serenity you seek. -Tara Maclay
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well, PN, if they're not rewriting the history books LITERALLY quite yet, they're certainly trying to rewrite them and leave out uncomfortable facts leading into the mid-term elections. They're REALLY into turd-polishing in trying to convince us that "Bush Kept Us Safe!", and that's what they're trying to run on. And they honestly expect Americans to NOT remember 9/11 or anthrax.
Now, if they could only get someone on American Idle [sic] to keep saying it, all Americans would finally believe it...
Mike
Work is the curse of the Drinking Class.
- Oscar Wilde
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME