Islam in Europe
POSTED BY: FutureMrsFIllion
UPDATED: Saturday, November 15, 2025 22:41
VIEWED: 7826
PAGE 3 of 7
Quote:
Originally posted by PirateCat:
JS, where ya bin. I saw video on what your talking about. The police in any liberal area are not on your side. I live in Tucson now these cops are just tax collectors. There after the sherriff up in Phoenix for doing his job.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/
"Battle of Serenity, Mal. Besides Zoe here, how many-" "I'm talkin at you! How many men in your platoon came out of their alive".
"That, my friends, was authentic Frontier-American gibberish."
- Olson Johnson, Blazing Saddles
Mike
just lying smiling in the dark
shooting stars around your heart
dreams come bouncing in your head
pure and simple everytime
now you're crying in your sleep
i wish you'd never learnt to weep
don't sell the dreams you should be keeping
pure and simple everytime
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:
Originally posted by mazaen:
Interesting view that many people don't value their own culture anymore. Maybe he's jelous that muslims do what other cultures can't. Muslims can continue to value their own culture when living in a western world when every other culture sells themselves out.
Muslims continue to value their own culture when living in a western world BECAUSE HERE IN THE WEST, WE DON'T MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR THEM TO DO SO . Try going to Saudia Arabia or Iran and openly living a Christian life, carrying around a Bible to and from Sunday mass.
Good luck w/ that.
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
Ironically, you COULD do that in Iraq - until we invaded it and turned it into a sectarian hell-hole.
Anyone remember Tariq Aziz? Yeah, he was a Christian, openly so, in Saddam's regime.
Mike
just lying smiling in the dark
shooting stars around your heart
dreams come bouncing in your head
pure and simple everytime
now you're crying in your sleep
i wish you'd never learnt to weep
don't sell the dreams you should be keeping
pure and simple everytime
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Kwicko your brains are in your ass, Why don't you travel and wake the fuck up you jackass. No wonder your mother dumped you as a kid.
"Battle of Serenity, Mal. Besides Zoe here, how many-" "I'm talkin at you! How many men in your platoon came out of their alive".
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by PirateCat:
Kwicko your brains are in your ass, Why don't you wake the fuck up you jackass.
You flatter him by implying he has brains. And by the way PC, be wwery, wwery careful not to post anything that portrays Muslim Jihadist murderers in a negative way. You wouldn't want to offend any of their freedom-fighting kindred spirits on this board. Good luck!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by PirateCat:
Kwicko your brains are in your ass, Why don't you travel and wake the fuck up you jackass. No wonder your mother dumped you as a kid.
"Battle of Serenity, Mal. Besides Zoe here, how many-" "I'm talkin at you! How many men in your platoon came out of their alive".
D+
Needs improvement.
In all your travels, did you never learn to read and write?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
BBC accused of 'appeasing Muslim fanatics'
Mohammed cartoonist accuses BBC of 'appeasing Muslim fanatics by not showing interview'
By Paul Revoir
Last updated at 8:31 AM on 03rd April 2009
The BBC has been accused of appeasement of radical Islam by the artist behind one of the infamous cartoons of Mohammed.
Kurt Westergaard claims the corporation's decision not to air a recent interview with him came because they are petrified of upsetting Muslims extremists.
Westergaard was one of the 12 cartoonists commissioned by the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper in 2005 to produce caricatures of the Muslim prophet.
Islamic tradition says no image of him should be produced or shown.
Muslims were particularly incensed by Westergaard's cartoon, which portrayed Mohammed with a bomb in his turban and was seen as extending the caricature of Muslims as terrorists. The images sparked protests and outrage across the globe.
Mr Westergaard, 73, gave his first-ever English interview to BBC journalist Malcolm Brabant four weeks ago. It had been expected to go out on BBC World, the BBC News channel, across radio services and on its website. But the corporation has kept the report under wraps amid claims it is frightened that it will 'inflame' Muslims around the world.
Mr Westergaard told the Daily Mail last night: 'I am disappointed on behalf of the freedom of speech. Every time you are afraid I think you make a step backwards. That is depressing me.'
He compared the BBC's behaviour with the way countries tried to appease Hitler before the Second World War and added: 'If you have an appeasement policy towards the radical Muslims then you are on a very wrong way and you have to start marching backwards.'
A BBC spokesman said last night: 'No decision has been made
Muslim family start Riots in German court room
http://www.thelocal.de/society/20090213-17415.html
The 24-year-old Ahmad-Sobair O. was convicted of murdering his 16-year-old sister Morsal O. on May 15, 2008 because she had turned away from her family. The girl died after suffering 23 stab wounds in a Sankt Georg district parking lot in Hamburg. Both siblings, who immigrated to Germany 13 years ago, have German citizenship.
“He killed out of pure intolerance,” Hamburg Judge Wolfgang Backen said while reading the verdict, adding that the murder was “treacherous” and a premeditated “bloodbath” after all other attempts to “discipline” his sister had failed.
His verdict sparked dramatic scenes in the court room as Ahmad Sobair O.’s family and friends wailed and hit the security glass behind which he was sitting. The accused himself began screaming: “You son of a whore! What is this, honour? I know no honour!”
He also yelled that had the trial taken place in Kabul, Afghanistan, he would have already been released long ago.
The murderer's mother then tried to throw herself out of a courtroom window, but was restrained by family members. Relatives of the accused also assaulted and threatened a journalist in the room.
The jihad against Britain's Jews
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3329296/the-jihad-against-b
ritains-jews.thtml
http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/02/15/british-women-pay-high-price-for
-multiculturalism/
For decades, the British people have undergone an onslaught of aggressive government propaganda schemes intent upon preparing them to first accept the multicultural totalitarian assault and to become a veritable doormat for millions of colonizers – the vast majority being from Islamic countries. There was no public debate nor any citizen vote - multiculturalism, along with militant political correctness - were thrust upon and infected the populous of Great Britain like the Black Plague. Multiculturalism - rather than being based on mutual respect - is a parasitic ideology that encourages immigrants, to not assimilate and to aggressively insist the invaded Western countries be subservient to them and their cultures. In my opinion, multiculturalism demands ‘reverse
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Free Speech is Dead in England - Conquered by Islam
LIVERPOOL, England - A Christian couple in England is now at risk of losing their business after being prosecuted for debating Islam with a Muslim guest.
Police arrested Ben and Sharon Vogelenzang, who run the Bounty House Hotel in Liverpool, after a Muslim woman complained that she was offended by comments made to her in March. Because the legal case is ongoing the couple cannot comment public More..ly.
According to newspaper reports, the debate at the hotel involved discussion of whether Jesus was the son of God or just a minor prophet of Islam. Newspapers also reported the debate included comments that Mohammed was a warlord and Muslim dress for women was a form of bondage.
The facts of the case are disputed, according to Mike Judge of the Christian Institute, a legal organization helping fund the couple's defense.
He says it's important that Christians defend their right to talk about their faith.
"Freedom of speech is something that is protected in England. But it is being eroded and there are cases of Christians now being told by police officers that they are not allowed to express their religious beliefs," he said. "This has caused the couple serious financial harm. The hotel has seen an 80 percent drop in its income, because a local hospital used to book its local outpatients there."
"As a result of this case and the criminal charges that have been put against these Christians, the hospital has decided not to send its outpatients there anymore," he continued.
Despite that, Judge says the couple has been overwhelmed by the support they've received from Christians around the world.
"They've been tremendously encouraged by hundreds and hundreds of Christians from all over the world emailing them to say, 'we're standing, we're praying with you, we're horrified that this is happening to you and we hope that you succeed in your legal defense,'" he said.
The pair is being prosecuted for a public order offense, when someone feels insulted for their membership of a religious group.
Judge says the case raises significant free speech and religious liberty issues.
"The reason this case is so important is that the freedom to share the Gospel in a Christian country really needs to be paramount and if people can't get involved in a debate about religion then we are losing our freedom of speech," he said. "This is not just an issue that we're facing in Britain, but we're facing it in other Western countries as well and Christians across those nations have to stand together to defend our freedom of speech."
A criminal trial is set for December 8at Liverpool Magistrates' Court.
If convicted the couple could face a maximum fine of $8,000. They'll also have a criminal record.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
At the risk of espousing an unpopular opinion, I will say that this is the dark side of 'protection from hate' laws.
I have never liked hate laws. They seem to be laws which attempt to divine and punish the content of people's minds and hearts. It's a bit too Orwellian for me.
Hate Speech is just speech you don't care for, in my opinion.
Hateful graffiti is just defacement of property.
Race motivated murder is, really, murder, which is sufficiant cause to put someone away.
As much as I dislike racism, I do not feel that racism should be illegal. That would be thought control. Rather, the individual destructive acts of racism can be (and mostly are) illegal and punishable in their own right.
The idea that people can not have conversations or debates on particular topics makes me uncomfortable and strikes me as wrong.
--Anthony
P.S. "Freedom of speech is one thing, but vulgar taunting and hateful threats are another."
No. It's the same thing. I have no problem with someone holding a sign that says, "All Americans Deserve to Die" just so long as I can hold up a sign countering it. Freedom of Speech is all Speech, no matter how it personally offends you.
"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I think you are confusing ideals with reality. It's great to have them but they just don't dovetail with how the populace works, as we are deeply flawed - or should I say, we are not ideal.
A simple exampIe about free speech. I was at a Boston Red Sox game recently. One particular fan was very "colorful" in his cheers for the Sox. Some near by fans with children complained. He continued. They got an usher and he was bounced. He was not drunk, just exercising his rights to free speech in the wrong place.
I'm afraid one can be blinded to "rightness" if one blindly follows such absolutes. Things are usually more shades of gray.
Scifi movie music + Firefly dialogue clips, 24 hours a day - http://www.scifiradio.com 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
That's not so much a shade of gray, as another right butting up against the first.
The owners of the venue have the right to eject anyone who is not contributing to the atmosphere they want to maintain.
And the ejected individual may have a right to a refund for services promised, unless the contract stipulates otherwise.
What I don't think anyone should have is the right to not be offended. Because a world with such laws would be a world more restrictive than a corset.
--Anthony
"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME