Thank you, Barney Frank!
POSTED BY: Kwicko
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 22:08
VIEWED: 18943
PAGE 16 of 20
"I do like to enter the water when the 'blue' sharks are circling the Wulf though. Or any other Poster who has the temerity to go against the prevailing flow of this place for that matter."
So where were you when I was criticizing Bush and 90% of people thought he was a hero ?
Oh that's right - you were joining the name-calling team. Remember those words ? Unpatriotic. Terrorist-supporter. Terrorist-lover. Remember ?
BTW - no I don't expect you to have an actual, rational, factual reply. Though I think I've made my point about you - that you lie, that you troll, that in your partisan hatred you know no level below which you will not stoop - to any thinking, rational person who can read.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
So where were you when I was criticizing Bush and 90% of people thought he was a hero ?
Oh that's right - you were joining the name-calling team. Remember those words ? Unpatriotic. Terrorist-supporter. Terrorist-lover. Remember ?
BTW - no I don't expect you to have an actual, rational, factual reply. Though I think I've made my point about you to any thinking, rational person who can read.
Click on my profile and you will see that I joined this site in March of 2006. At that time I believe 90% of people were criticizing Bush and 10% thought he was a hero.
So how was that answer? Factual? Rational?
Do you still think you made your point? To those that can read I mean.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And yet, you still supported the thugs who did that crap. And that makes you --- what again ? A defender of the little guy ? Hardly. 
You'll back ANYONE, ANYTHING, ANY LEVEL OF HATRED - as long as it's YOUR partisan brand.
And I'm right about you.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
And yet, you still supported the thugs who did that crap. And that makes you --- what again ? A defender of the little guy ? Hardly.
Oh yeah, your whole silence is consent thing.
Tell me Rue, why do you think the moon is made of green cheese? I mean I've never seen you state otherwise.
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
You'll back ANYONE, ANYTHING, ANY LEVEL OF HATRED - as long as it's YOUR partisan brand.
And I'm right about you.
Saying that does not make it so.
What if I was to say you'll back anyone, anything, any level of hatred as long as it's your partisan brand. Oh, crap, I think I just proved my "saying it does not make it so" statement wrong.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Digby: Heard and understood. My bad; seems that way most of the time. Will proceed without ascribing feelings.
________________________
Together we are greater than the sum of our parts
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well, let's see:
Wulf -
Not just racist, but an equal opportunity hater of anyone who he thinks got what HE deserved. That would be blacks, women, educated people, liberals, and anyone who didn't come up through HIS neighborhood, is HIS particular time, with HIS particular experience. He blames 'them' for everything wrong with HIS life. He blames 'them' for anything wrong with 'THEIR' lives. He quite insanely thinks 'they' are in control.
He takes all the credit for anything good in his life. And he uses that notion in two conflicting ways: he must be special b/c he got out, and, alternatively, if he could do it, anyone could. And so he blames 'them' for not doing so as well.
And what he has against health care - well, if it was for deserving white men - like himself - I don't think we'd be seeing any objection. No, what HIS STATED objection is that some of it would go to the hated 'them'. And it drives him to such a racist froth he can't contain himself.
That kind of insane rationalizing he's doing is extremely dangerous.
As an analogy - I'm sure OJ Simpson never told himself: I am going to murder my ex in cold blood along with anyone unlucky enough who happens to be there. No, what I'm sure he told himself is: NO man could put up with this. ANY man would feel the same way. It's not FAIR ! that she got famous through me and got my money and a HAPPY LIFE and LEFT ! She was NOBODY before me. She doesn't DESERVE to be happy off of me and without me ! And so on.
So, to get back to Wulfie - what exactly are you siding with ? Racism ? Hatred ? Unhinged and potentially dangerous rationalizations ?
Now, as for your supposed interest in the 'little guy' - where you when I was saying the police should not have tasered the student at a Kerry speech (Sep 17, 2007) ? Did you stand up for the 'little guy' - me - there ? Because my opinion was extremely unpopular.
Did you stand up for me when I was saying the state had a duty to investigate claims made against the FLDS (Apr 19, 2008) ? As I recall my opinion was extremely unpopular.
No, by your history, which you so willingly point to, you show that you are NOT defending the minority no matter who. You are merely defending YOUR partisan collection of hatreds. And you do have many. Just like Wulfie.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Well, let's see:
Wulf -
Not just racist, but an equal opportunity hater of anyone who he thinks got what HE deserved. That would be blacks, women, educated people, liberals, and anyone who didn't come up through HIS neighborhood, is HIS particular time, with HIS particular experience. He blames 'them' for everything wrong with HIS life. He blames 'them' for anything wrong with 'THEIR' lives. He quite insanely thinks 'they' are in control.
He takes all the credit for anything good in his life. And he uses that notion in two conflicting ways: he must be special b/c he got out, and, alternatively, if he could do it, anyone could. And so he blames 'them' for not doing so as well.
And what he has against health care - well, if it was for deserving white men - like himself - I don't think we'd be seeing any objection. No, what HIS STATED objection is that some of it would go to the hated 'them'. And it drives him to such a racist froth he can't contain himself.
That kind of insane rationalizing he's doing is extremely dangerous.
I think I will let Wulf answer your assumptions regarding his character.
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
As an analogy - I'm sure OJ Simpson never told himself: I am going to murder my ex in cold blood along with anyone unlucky enough who happens to be there. No, what I'm sure he told himself is: NO man could put up with this. ANY man would feel the same way. It's not FAIR ! that she got famous through me and got my money and a HAPPY LIFE and LEFT ! She was NOBODY before me. She doesn't DESERVE to be happy off of me and without me ! And so on.
(cue announcer voice)
And this little interlude was brought to you by the makers of Rue. Rue, the no-sense 'wiperouter' of reason with passion.
Seriously, did you just compare Wulf to O.J.? Why not just call him Hitler or Stalin?
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
So, to get back to Wulfie - what exactly are you siding with ? Racism ? Hatred ? Unhinged and potentially dangerous rationalizations ?
No. Just 'siding' with anyone who seems to get you riled up.
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Now, as for your supposed interest in the 'little guy' - where you when I was saying the police should not have tasered the student at a Kerry speech (Sep 17, 2007) ? Did you stand up for the 'little guy' - me - there ? Because my opinion was extremely unpopular.
Be honest Rue. I believe there was a fairly close 50/50 split for and against the tasering of said student. You were in the against camp and I was in the for camp, imagine that.
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Did you stand up for me when I was saying the state had a duty to investigate claims made against the FLDS (Apr 19, 2008) ? As I recall my opinion was extremely unpopular.
As I recall, I believe you and Signy were having a go at Frem in that particular thread. Two against one does not sound like a minority for you at all.
Perhaps your indignation is innocent after all. Perhaps it's your memory, not your ideology that is at the root of your issues.
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
No, by your history, which you so willingly point to, you show that you are NOT defending the minority no matter who. You are merely defending YOUR partisan collection of hatreds. And you do have many. Just like Wulfie.
Which is part of being human, IMHO. Tell me Rue, are you human?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"No. Just 'siding' with anyone who seems to get you riled up."
Now I see - you WERE lying when you posted:
"I do like to enter the water when the 'blue' sharks are circling the Wulf though. Or any other Poster who has the temerity to go against the prevailing flow of this place for that matter."
and
"No, I just don't like gangs of bullies."
Will wonders never cease.
***************************************************************
BTW - it would help your argument if you could keep your lies straight.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Kathy,
Chill
I'm not sure who you're trying to compare to OJ Simpson here, but you're devoting your time and energy to:
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey Dream,
Why not let people express their feelings and opinions without your peanut gallery observations.
Just because you do not like the partisan bickering does not mean that all here share that same sentiment.
Now off you go to try to re-classify RWED or post a 200 + word post telling others to keep their posts under 200 words.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME