Thank you, Barney Frank!
POSTED BY: Kwicko
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 22:08
VIEWED: 18943
PAGE 15 of 20
Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
I would appreciate a direct response to my prediction, and to my request for a single instance of where you criticized the Bush administration or made a single prediction about where his policies would lead. Because for someone who keeps sayin' ANYONE could have predicted that! the problem is... you didn't.
I would appreciate if you could wait more than two seconds before adding another needless post to an ever growing thread that you will lament for it's slow loading time no doubt.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Mike,
I'd like to thank you for starting a pit of hell thread. The forum always needs one around just to swallow the partisan bickering, and keep it away from everyone else. Judos. I mean Kudos.
Admiral, should you ever return, you can't possibly be "quaint" as something would have to be outdated to be quaint, and you are a n00b.
No offense, I would have to care to give offense, I would nuke such threads if they didn't perform such a wonderful function and benefit society by sucking in all the BS that might get posted elsewhere where people were trying to have a civilized conversation, even if they do push people to the point where (reference omitted here.)
O would some power the giftie gie us to see ourselves in some necroposted threads of earlier this year...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Right after you prove how impartial YOU are. Good luck with that.
Never said I was impartial. Can you make the same claim regarding the targets of your grammar finger waggings?
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Do I really have to go through EVERY post, or can I just start with yours? That should keep me busy for quite a while. You tend to misuse your "apostrophe-s" an awful lot, referring to multiple posters as "other's" when you're not trying to imply ownership.
Check. We already know your tactics for Posters who disagree with you. Now show us all how you can point out errors in the posts of those you agree with and we're onto something.
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
By the way, you freely admit your partisanship - only coming around when "the blue sharks" are circling - yet you seem to want the rest of us to be nonpartisan. Does that seem right to you? I've never seen one single instance of you pointing out the errors of those on YOUR side of the argument. Why is that, do you think? Shouldn't you be proving to us all how impartial you are?
Please see my response to Signy regarding this matter.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well BDN, as I had originally posted my request yesterday (Yesterday? Maybe the day before.) I was under the impression you were avoiding answering.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Actually, you have asked me about it twice today.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And brought it up yesterday as well.
Anyway I have to go. TTUL.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Right after you prove how impartial YOU are. Good luck with that.
Never said I was impartial. Can you make the same claim regarding the targets of your grammar finger waggings?
Can I claim that I never said I was impartial? Why yes, I think I can make that claim. Since you dispute it, can you provide us all with some evidence?
Quote:Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Do I really have to go through EVERY post, or can I just start with yours? That should keep me busy for quite a while. You tend to misuse your "apostrophe-s" an awful lot, referring to multiple posters as "other's" when you're not trying to imply ownership.
Check. We already know your tactics for Posters who disagree with you. Now show us all how you can point out errors in the posts of those you agree with and we're onto something.
Actually, it's something I tend to reserve for posters (no need to capitalize that, really) who try to insinuate that they're smarter, in an effort to imbue themselves with a false sense of security.
So, since we already know your tactics for posters who disagree with you, why don't you show us all how you can point out errors in the posts of those you agree with?
Quote:Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
By the way, you freely admit your partisanship - only coming around when "the blue sharks" are circling - yet you seem to want the rest of us to be nonpartisan. Does that seem right to you? I've never seen one single instance of you pointing out the errors of those on YOUR side of the argument. Why is that, do you think? Shouldn't you be proving to us all how impartial you are?
Please see my response to Signy regarding this matter.
So you gang up with others because you don't like it when others "gang up"? How very... ironical of you.
Mike
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I'd like to thank you for starting a pit of hell thread. The forum always needs one around just to swallow the partisan bickering, and keep it away from everyone else. Judos. I mean Kudos.
Glad to be of service.
Mike
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
So you gang up with others because you don't like it when others "gang up"? How very... ironical of you.
How very fabricated of you.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
