National Historic Landmark

POSTED BY: whozit
UPDATED: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 18:14
VIEWED: 3939
PAGE 1 of 3

1 2 3 NEXT PAGE

WHOZIT

Friday, July 17, 2009 10:10 PM

I was by there the other day, it's still there. I think some aliens pissed on it tho

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,533536,00.html

KWICKO

Friday, July 17, 2009 10:32 PM

It doesn't matter whether the mission happens or not. If it does happen, and it indeed proves the Moon landings, PN and his kind will simply retort that THIS mission was a fake as well. If it doesn't happen due to budgetary constraints or a failure to launch, why then THAT proves that the lunar expeditions were fake, too. It's a no-win for us, and a win-win for PN.

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

If it wasn't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college...

PIRATENEWS

Saturday, July 18, 2009 6:26 AM

A Masonic Landmark...

Several Lunar orbiter flights failed to photo any evidence of Apollo, even with sufficient resolution. Photochop dont count.

Apollo 11 MIA
www.boulder.swri.edu/~durda/Apollo/ls_11h.html

Suddenly TODAY, NASA claims FOR THE FIRST TIME to have photos of Apollo LEMs at Apollo landing sites on LOWERCASE "moon"...
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=7&t=39145

Today NASA also claims to have "digitally enhanced" the Apollo 11 video, which video was discovered FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 40 YEARS this month... "Digital enhancement" includes eliminating wires hanging from the ceiling to simulate weightlessness, lack of stars, lack of rocket exhaust and NASA helpers in the background.
www.thedailytimes.com/article/20090717/NEWS/307179995/-1/FRONTPAGE

LEADB

Saturday, July 18, 2009 4:35 PM

If you'd like to read NASA's version of the tape restoration portion of this discussion, take a look here:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/40th/apollo11_tapes.html

You decide which is more credible.

Personally, I think the 'original' digital tapes were lost when NASA started re-using tapes. I suspect the tech who mounted the tape didn't have a clue what he was setting up to be taped over.

OLDENGLANDDRY

Saturday, July 18, 2009 5:24 PM

How can this be a "National" historic landmark when it is a very, VERY long way away from your own country?

PIRATENEWS

Monday, July 20, 2009 12:26 PM

Kosher Geraldo says moon landing was faked:

Moon Landing Conspiracy Faked by Fox Part 1:

NASA spokesman Brian Welch was assassinated after this video, for asking NASA to actually offer proof of the moon landing. He died of a "heart attack". He was 42 years old.

HERO

Monday, July 20, 2009 12:46 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by oldenglanddry:
How can this be a "National" historic landmark when it is a very, VERY long way away from your own country?

The moon is US territory.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you"- Chrisisall, 2009.

PIRATENEWS

Monday, July 20, 2009 1:16 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Hero:

Quote:
Originally posted by oldenglanddry:

How can this be a "National" historic landmark when it is a very, VERY long way away from your own country?

The moon is US territory.

Yes, robots have now replaced humans, since only robots can live on the Moon. Soon they will have their own government.

Quote:
"Surprisingly, the Moon is a moderately bright gamma-ray source. The only part of the electromagnetic spectrum where the Moon is brighter than the Sun is gamma rays. The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares. When cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet, and trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!"
-Dr Robert Naeye PhD, NASA GLAST, FERMI GAMMA RAY SPACE TELESCOPE, 23 August 2007
www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/GLAST/science/solar_system.html

Quote:
"If we had actually landed on the Moon in 1969, we'd now have International House of Pancakes on the Moon. We'd have Walmarts on the Moon by now. Instead NASA said, 'Been there done that. Poof, no need to go back...'"
-Capt Joyce Riley USAF, The Power Hour Radio Show, 20 July 2009
http://thepowerhour.com

AGENTROUKA

Monday, July 20, 2009 1:20 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Hero:
Quote:
Originally posted by oldenglanddry:
How can this be a "National" historic landmark when it is a very, VERY long way away from your own country?

The moon is US territory.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you"- Chrisisall, 2009.

'Scuse me, what?

PIRATENEWS

Monday, July 20, 2009 1:28 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by leadb:
If you'd like to read NASA's version of the tape restoration portion of this discussion, take a look here:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/40th/apollo11_tapes.html

You decide which is more credible.

Personally, I think the 'original' digital tapes were lost when NASA started re-using tapes. I suspect the tech who mounted the tape didn't have a clue what he was setting up to be taped over.

"Restoration" by NASA contractors includes eliminating wires hanging from the ceiling to simulate weightlessness, lack of stars, lack of rocket exhaust, objects falling at the speed of gravity on Earth, NASA helpers not wearing spacesuits on the moon...

Note how that NASA story about "restoration" censors the fact that Apollo computer tapes were already found at McDonalds:
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=35091&m=642567
www.thelivingmoon.com/47john_lear/02files/Lunar_Orbiter_Tapes_Found.ht
ml
http://data4science.net/essays.php?EssayID=848

No "chain of custody" means those tapes are inadmissible as evidence in every court of law.

Pirate flag was not photochopped, but NASA photochopped "new" Apollo 11 video in 2009
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=35091&m=642567

1 2 3 NEXT PAGE