Monday nights ratings are in
POSTED BY: whozit
UPDATED: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 01:21
VIEWED: 1213
PAGE 1 of 1
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/10/monday-ratings-dancing-with-the-s
tars-returns-bigger-than-before/14206
You may like these, they do'nt suck 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
They don't suck? They do if you are a fan of "Chuck," and "Castle" didn't do much with that huge Dancing lead-in.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Castle is a show word of mouth will assist, and it's not arc-driven, that helps.
Originally posted by ecgordon:
They don't suck? They do if you are a fan of "Chuck," and "Castle" didn't do much with that huge Dancing lead-in.

The laughing Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey Castle did better than 24 and that's supposed to be a big hit show... so it's all good
To love someone is to see a miracle invisible to others.
--Francois Mauriac
It's fuzzy-minded liberal thinking like that that gets you eaten.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Castle did fine over 11 million viewers, Big Bang with Summer did fine. That means the ratings did'nt suck, I forgot about Adam on CHUCK tho.
Originally posted by ecgordon:
They don't suck? They do if you are a fan of "Chuck," and "Castle" didn't do much with that huge Dancing lead-in.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ratings are not just a matter of number of viewers. Networks also take into account how later shows hold onto a previous show's audience. Castle lost half of Dancing with the Stars' audience. That can't be viewed very positively, no matter how you want to spin the numbers.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME