Cartoon Network performs human sacrifice to Satan
POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 19:22
VIEWED: 4029
PAGE 3 of 4
Pirate News is his own worst enemy, and the best friend of any real conspirators in the world.
His fothy-mouthed exuberant posts replete with random insults of Jewish people cause anything he says to be blocked from the reasoning part of the brain.
Pirate News is the very phenomenon you describe here. A witness who is begging to be laughed off the stand.
It reminds me of the episode of the X-Files where Men In Black visit a UFO witness and declare, ominously, "What you saw was Swamp Gas reflecting light from the planet Venus!"
The scene rendered the witness unbelievable. His eye-witness account of the UFO would naturally be followed by his account of the rediculous 'Men in Black' and their equally ludicrous 'planet Venus' speech.
If Pirate News could only adjust the signal-to-noise ratio, he could do so much better. I often wonder if he isn't a 'Man in Black' himself.
--Anthony
"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Anthony, you ain't sayin nothin I haven't told him a dozen times or more already, even when he's got the goods, his presentation and stretched assumptions blow his case and make folks roundfile it in their brain without even thinkin about it - beyond which, burying folk in information generally makes em ignore you.
In fact most muckrakers do a bad job of it, you really can't force information on folk, not only does it somewhat offend me as a coercive thing (being an anarchist and all) but people really don't like to be told what to think, or that they're dumb/foolish/gullible... I am sure that the irony of the example Rap handily provided will be forever completely lost on him.
My method is to put just enough up front to show that there is evidence backing the claim, and let folk make their own call, they can take the blue pill and dream on, or they can investigate and reach a different conclusion, or maybe reach the same one, but I ultimately leave the decision up to them, what they wanna do about it - tho I am not at all above mocking folk who refuse to even question their own assumptions.
Faith is fine for religion, but for anything else it's generally a mistake and folks should look at things they 'know' and ask themselves "And I believe this... why ?"
And if the answer is, "Because I want to."... I just don't think that's good enough.
I like PN, oft times he asks some hard questions no one else would dare, sometimes questions that should be asked, that need to be - but agreed that he's his own worst enemy and his presentation sucks... although this thread was better than most, I must admit.
And if I have to hear from one radical end of the political spectrum, which we seem to have in abundance here, even discounting the sock puppets, I'd like to hear from all extremes thereof, just to see what's on their mind and what their issues are.
As for the rest...
Nothin wrong with skepticism, but the first and most important place to apply it is to your own assumptions, if you ever wanna learn anything - in fact that was probably the only thing I actually "learned" from the heavily propagandized so-called "history" class taught in my school.
Everyone should question their assumptions, if naught else, it provides a clearer picture of the world around you.
-Frem
It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I wonder why folks are so ready to dismiss information because of what they judge to be the poor character of the informant. Does that seem right to you? For the most part, I see information as information and judge it according to its own merits. It's almost as if folks are looking for a reason not to take someone seriously because they didn't want to believe the story in the first place. 
I mean, in the case of this thread: OF COURSE the cartoonists were aware of the photos of Bohemian Grove when they drew the picture of Moloch. Most people are aware of the Internet and if you're writing a kitchy story about Satan's daughter the source material is just begging to be incorporated. Bohemian Grove has been in the news since I was a kid.
Speakin' of which, back when I was a kid, incest was itself one of these things that never really happened, or was at most vanishingly rare, and survivors were put on the stand and discredited. Now, thanks to folks like Oprah Whinfrey, incest is taken a little more seriously. I have faith ( ) that these child sex rings will be exposed in time.
It all seems to come back to the authoritarian mindset--how folks feel the need to support their leaders/parents and institutions even if it cost them their freedom or their connection to reality. Freedom just isn't comfortable, it's certainly not secure and it comes with a lot of personal responsibility and there are never any guarantees. It really is a choice between the blue pill and the red.
HKCavalier
Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Your threshhold is a bit off, AURaptor.
There really is a Bohemian Grove. The location is not in doubt.*
There really is a large cement statue of an owl situated on a pond and a ceremony where something is burned.
Influential people really do go to the Bohemian Grove for yearly gatherings.
None of these things are in any way shape or form controversial.
Now what goes on at those retreats, and what is the intent of the ceremony(ies) and what is burned, etc. that is where the ambiguity crops up.
* On my birthday drive two years ago, while looking for a road to the coast on my way up to Fort Ross, I happened to drive past a part of the Bohemian Grove. I had pretty much assumed that PN was making all that stuff up so I was surprised to find out this place actually existed and had roadside signage and everything. Turns out, after doing a little reading, it really is a big deal - in an elite country club kind of way - and big whigs meet and greet there on a regular basis. And have been meeting and greeting there for more than a hundred years.
So it's not that the existence of the place is in doubt, it's just what goes on at this place that is in dispute.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And basing children's entertainment off issues of the day is hardly new....
Ring around the rosy,
Pockets full of posies,
Ashes, Ashes,
We all fall down!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
Your threshhold is a bit off, AURaptor.
There really is a Bohemian Grove. The location is not in doubt.*
There really is a large cement statue of an owl situated on a pond and a ceremony where something is burned.
Influential people really do go to the Bohemian Grove for yearly gatherings.
None of these things are in any way shape or form controversial.
Now what goes on at those retreats, and what is the intent of the ceremony(ies) and what is burned, etc. that is where the ambiguity crops up.
* On my birthday drive two years ago, while looking for a road to the coast on my way up to Fort Ross, I happened to drive past a part of the Bohemian Grove. I had pretty much assumed that PN was making all that stuff up so I was surprised to find out this place actually existed and had roadside signage and everything. Turns out, after doing a little reading, it really is a big deal - in an elite country club kind of way - and big whigs meet and greet there on a regular basis. And have been meeting and greeting there for more than a hundred years.
So it's not that the existence of the place is in doubt, it's just what goes on at this place that is in dispute.
I think you just made my point, and there's not too much in particular on which we disagree. The big " ? " is the who goes there, and for what reason. There are influential people, and then there are INFLUENTIAL people. Unanswered questions, for some , are simply an excuse to let their imaginations run wild.
That ain't me.
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Chrisisall whined:
And after he used them, they were, like, you know...USED.
But he very much enjoyed the rumour, which he fostered, that he had MORE, and nastier ones....until it looked to bite him on the ass, that is.
See, the BIG problem the rest of the world had w/ Saddam was that he wasn't exactly the most honest of the world's tyrants. And when all the intel suggested he had WMD, and the U.N. kept finding things which Saddam 'swore' he had gotten rid of, or didn't remember even existed ( Remember the 500+ chem warhead shells ? Duh. ), we all tended to believe that Saddam wasn't on the up and up. And he wasn't. But was his lie so far off from the truth that it warrented going to war ? Now THAT is a legitimate question ! Sadly, too few are willing to touch on that topic. It's easier to simply say stupid things like ' Bush lied, people died ' when we know that's not the case at all. Far more complicated than that.
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Lucky I wasn't drinking soda when I read this
Chrisisall whined:
.20 Quatloos to AU for the funny! Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There is no doubt about BG. Watch this video where David Gergen gets bumrushed by Alex Jones
Gergen admits it and Jones shows his footage of the rituals...This is fact..However, Jones does make Art Bell look like CNN. And there is the problem. Who the hell would listen to Jones?
That said, watch the video anyway. I think Gergen's response speaks volumes.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't doubt this stuff, but I doubt its relevence. The goal here is to create lackies who must obey or be exposed for some horrible crime. So, that's how they get their lackies. I was just visiting Deer Island where Skull and Bones does the same thing. This just explains why the lackies never disobey. But it's not like every gang and drug ring in America, or the world, isn't doing the same thing.
I'm less concerned with how they got their lackeys, then in stopping the mindless hordes from carrying out their plans.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME