A spanking fetish, perhaps?

POSTED BY: canttakesky
UPDATED: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 20:26
VIEWED: 1529
PAGE 1 of 1

CANTTAKESKY

Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:37 AM

http://radgeek.com/gt/2008/06/11/beating_up/

I couldn't resist posting this, since so many people disputed that a judge's offer for leniency in sentencing was not "coercion" in the last thread I participated in.

--------------------------
Not gonna argue, just tossing this out.

SERGEANTX

Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:43 AM

Is there a video link?

...

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

FLETCH2

Thursday, June 12, 2008 5:49 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by canttakesky:
http://radgeek.com/gt/2008/06/11/beating_up/

I couldn't resist posting this, since so many people disputed that a judge's offer for leniency in sentencing was not "coercion" in the last thread I participated in.

--------------------------
Not gonna argue, just tossing this out.

Everybody thought you were wrong last time. Scouring the internet for a completely different case doesn't make you "right." Get over it.

PIRATENEWS

Friday, June 13, 2008 2:03 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SergeantX:
Is there a video link?

...

SergeantX

Here's the video:

CANTTAKESKY

Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:09 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fletch2:
Everybody thought you were wrong last time. Scouring the internet for a completely different case doesn't make you "right." Get over it.

I didn't scour the internet for anything. I saw something interesting, which happened to remind me of an old conversation here. I thought I could make just ONE post without getting any nastiness flung at me, but that is too much to expect, isn't it?

Thanks for reminding me why I left RWED. This board has become a depository of spiteful contumelies and knee-jerk incivilities. What happened to graciousness or sportsmanship in debates? Why is there a need to automatically assume the worst of people you disagree with?

Shame on you, Fletch. Shame on you.

FLETCH2

Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:19 PM

I respond to your track record. Had you posted this and just said "wow this is interesting" I might have looked on it differently but you didn't, you chose to link it to your rant over your criminal tax evader friend. You linked the subjects then get upset when I question your motivation for linking the subjects!!

I just find you funny.

WASHNWEAR

Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:26 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by canttakesky:
Quote:
Originally posted by Fletch2:
Everybody thought you were wrong last time. Scouring the internet for a completely different case doesn't make you "right." Get over it.
I didn't scour the internet for anything. I saw something interesting, which happened to remind me of an old conversation here. I thought I could make just ONE post without getting any nastiness flung at me, but that is too much to expect, isn't it?

Thanks for reminding me why I left RWED. This board has become a depository of spiteful contumelies and knee-jerk incivilities. What happened to graciousness or sportsmanship in debates? Why is there a need to automatically assume the worst of people you disagree with?

Shame on you, Fletch. Shame on you.

Two thoughts off-hand: Okay, I lied - I don't even have one thought, except...we need to get Cheney in here. Dick Cheney would have an absolute "go F yourself" field day in the RWED.

It was almost like releasing him back into the wild when we got here!