Cartoon Network performs human sacrifice to Satan

POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 19:22
VIEWED: 4029
PAGE 2 of 4

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 NEXT PAGE

LEADB

Sunday, October 14, 2007 11:43 AM

Frem,
I want to make sure I have this straight. There are molesters who use the trappings of satanic rituals to either control, frighten or confuse the victims (entirely believable), and, when the victims testify to this, the molesters are left off? I don't get it. Is it the judge or the jury that is finding this hard to believe?

FREMDFIRMA

Sunday, October 14, 2007 4:17 PM

Both - it seems an instant, reflexive, pre-programmed dismissal, the same way folks eventually learn to tone out annoying co-workers or church sermons.

The freaks are playing on a psychological blind spot, the automatic relegation of such things to kind of a mental dump bin - now, whether that blind spot was *intentionally* created or not, is a matter of some debate, which is why stuff like what PN posted, and Rap's automatic reaction to it concerns me so.

Just think of how MUCH stuff one can cram in those blind spots... depending on the masses to automatically dismiss it instantly without a second thought as conspiracy theory.

Case example:
(no, this has never been done, yet, but one reason for the value of my advice is that I can think ahead of these slimy bastards.)

Say a freak lived near a heavily forested area, sees how well this satanic trick comes off... and thinks, hey, let's play on that, and gets himself a bigfoot outfit.

First, there's catchin him, any witnesses trying to report it will be laughed out of town by the police, if not locked up themselves as crazies, and totally discredited.

Then, IF they catch him, they may not bag the suit, or it could be dismissed cause it wasn't specifically on the warrant or what have you - then you got nothin.

And even IF they get him, the suit, and credible physical evidence...
All the defense has to do is put the witnesses on the stand, and publicly mock them.

Bang, game over.

See how easy it is ?

Especially if folks don't WANT to believe it, goes right along with their natural tendancy to find some other, easier explaination that doesn't require actual thought and assauges their conscience - the same way folks who witness a crime, say.. auto theft, in progress like to think "No, he probably just locked his keys in there, not my business, not my problem.." and totally dismiss it because to do anything else would require time, effort, and a bit of mental/moral fortitude, something which, frankly, most people lack - or have crushed out of them by our society over time.

And most especially, when dealing with THIS issue, and the severity of the automatic denial response, something played on by freaks for YEARS (to this day there's still folk playing the "no such thing" card!) finding any pyschological 'out' to utilize, thus allowing folks to deny it ever happened, will blow a case, cause no one WANTS to believe it.

Until it happens to them.

And no, this isn't the only issue the concept applies to, just the most pointedly obvious one, which is why one should be VERY careful what they dismiss without a second glance.

I play on it myself, for crying out loud... who even NOTICES one more cab in a city, one more janitorial staff in coveralls in an office building, one more bluesuit at crime scene, one more flunky in scrubs at a hospital ?

It's what you don't see - that some day will hurt you.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

CHRISISALL

Sunday, October 14, 2007 4:42 PM

PN is correct on this one, mostly. This is beyond peeps like AU's ability to take seriously- hide in plain sight and all that.

It works Chrisisall

AURAPTOR

Sunday, October 14, 2007 4:47 PM

Quote:
The freaks are playing on a psychological blind spot, the automatic relegation of such things to kind of a mental dump bin - now, whether that blind spot was *intentionally* created or not, is a matter of some debate, which is why stuff like what PN posted, and Rap's automatic reaction to it concerns me so.

Sorry, but I'm not into accepting tabloid fiction as hard factual accounts. I'd be more willing to believe that J.R.R. Tolkien's tales of Middle Earth are actual accounts of man's lost history than the tripe that PN spills all over these boards. Why ? Because of a thing called believability. Mainly, because PN offers nothing in the way of substantive fact, save for volumes of more ficticious writing and disjointed logic / wild conjecture.

I'm all about being skeptical, and until I see solid proof, I'm not buying into the hysterical claims so often presented here.

Be comforted, not concerned.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

CHRISISALL

Sunday, October 14, 2007 4:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:

I'm all about being skeptical, and until I see solid proof, I'm not buying into the hysterical claims so often presented here.

There IS no "solid proof" where your emotionally invested beliefs are concerned, AURaptor. You've proved that time and again.

Let's waste no time Chrisisall

FREMDFIRMA

Sunday, October 14, 2007 5:51 PM

"I'm all about being skeptical, and until I see solid proof, I'm not buying into the hysterical claims so often presented here."

Oh but you sure bought those iraqi WMDs, didn't you - just got down on your knees and chug-a-lugged it, morelike.

If it fits with what you WANT to believe, you'll swallow anything.

As far as proof goes, there is indeed hard proof of some of the stuff PN posts, and that's the scary part, really - but it all falls right into your massive pyschological blindspot cause it doesn't fit your view of how the world is supposed to work.

To me, that's the very definition of gullibility, in both directions.

Thanks for the case example of exactly how it works, Rap.

-F

CHRISISALL

Sunday, October 14, 2007 6:16 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

Oh but you sure bought those iraqi WMDs, didn't you -

But Frem, that's different! There IS SOLID PROOF for their existence...

uhhh...it's just that someone hid the proof...

Chrisisall

AURAPTOR

Sunday, October 14, 2007 7:30 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:

I'm all about being skeptical, and until I see solid proof, I'm not buying into the hysterical claims so often presented here.

There IS no "solid proof" where your emotionally invested beliefs are concerned, AURaptor. You've proved that time and again.

Let's waste no time Chrisisall

Emotion has nothing to do w/ it.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

AURAPTOR

Sunday, October 14, 2007 7:33 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
"I'm all about being skeptical, and until I see solid proof, I'm not buying into the hysterical claims so often presented here."

Oh but you sure bought those iraqi WMDs, didn't you - just got down on your knees and chug-a-lugged it, morelike.

If it fits with what you WANT to believe, you'll swallow anything.

As far as proof goes, there is indeed hard proof of some of the stuff PN posts, and that's the scary part, really - but it all falls right into your massive pyschological blindspot cause it doesn't fit your view of how the world is supposed to work.

To me, that's the very definition of gullibility, in both directions.

Thanks for the case example of exactly how it works, Rap.

-F

Iraq's WMD existed. Everyone knows that. From Clinton, Gore, Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy, etc..to the 5,000 + Kurds who died from Saddam's use of said weapons. The point is moot. It has zero to do w/ what I " want " , it's an undeniable fact. Proof positive. The U.N. and every damn intelligence agency around the world agreed.

Seems you're trying to convince yourself rather than me. Gullible is believing that which can't be verified. PN seems to think that the world leaders worship Molech, or some such nonsense. You buy into that, for who knows what reason.

Alex Jones makes Art Bell look like CNN.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

CHRISISALL

Sunday, October 14, 2007 8:39 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:

Iraq's WMD existed.

At one time, he had some, yes.

Quote:
Everyone knows that. From Clinton, Gore, Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy, etc..to the 5,000 + Kurds who died from Saddam's use of said weapons.

He used them, yes.

Quote:
The point is moot. It has zero to do w/ what I " want " , it's an undeniable fact.

Yes, YES- he used them, that's not IN QUESTION!!!

Quote:
Proof positive.

I GET THAT ALREADY!!!!!!

Quote:
The U.N. and every damn intelligence agency around the world agreed.

YES-YES!!!THEY ALL KNOW HE USED THEM!!!!

And after he used them, they were, like, you know...USED.
But he very much enjoyed the rumour, which he fostered, that he had MORE, and nastier ones....until it looked to bite him on the ass, that is.

ARE WE LEARNING YET??????

Silly me, I forgot, you can't DO that
'CAUSE YOU'RE A GORRAM RUTTIN' BIPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chrisisall

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 NEXT PAGE