Mahmoud Ahmadinejad murders gay people!
POSTED BY: CrevanReaver
UPDATED: Sunday, September 30, 2007 10:14
VIEWED: 7501
PAGE 1 of 10
Although he claims there are no gay people in Iran.
Clear evidence proves otherwise. Maybe it was a translation error and he meant "There will be no gays in Iran" because Ahmadinejad's government is doing its best to exterminate the gay population of Iran.
These are two Iranian gay teenagers who were kept in a cage, publicly humiliated, gruesomely hung, and left to dangle in front of the macabre crowd. That way they could serve as a warning to anyone who would dare be homosexual in Iran's Islamic utopia:
http://www.mererhetoric.com/archives/11274175.html
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's one way to stop the spread of AIDS. Have you seen Iranian women though?...yikes!, "too much hair"!....Kinda makes goin' homo almost a necessary option there. A'int no Gay Days at Disneyworld-Teheran. I also wonder how long Mr. DTMB would have lasted at Teheran University interrupting one of Achminassholeajhad's speeches. I wish all "open-minded" liberals the joyful opportunity to visit there...soon.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by CrevanReaver:
Although he claims there are no gay people in Iran.
Somebody is lying. Unless he means there are no gays in Iran because he's killed them all. In which case...he's right.
I suspect he looks foreward to the day when there are no Jews in Isreal...
Funny though how they applaud everything he says...the lies, the threats, the stupid assed assertions...they only boo his hardline stance on gays. I suspect, given a choice, that the majority of faculty at Columbia would gladly take this fellow over President Bush. After all the way liberals see it, if you can't trust civil liberties, the lives of countless Jews, gays, and women, and a nuclear bomb to an Iranian dictator...who can you trust?
H
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And this is the guy so many wanted to hear ? This is the 'world leader' that so many on the Left would rather have instead of George Bush ???
I'm beyond stunned. Look at this photo. THIS is who the Islamo fascist are! This is what they DO! This guy and his kind are 100x's worse and are donig EXACTLY what the Left accuses Bush and his types of doing. Only this isn't some piratenews bullshit, this is real life! WTF are folks thinking about when THIS is what he does to his own people, and they applaud him in the halls of Columbia University ??? Are folks out of their FUCKING MINDS?? 
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So, I suppose this is the reason to invade Iran. Save the Iranian gays from their leader. There is another alternative though, we could have the Iranian gays apply for status as political refugees.
BTW, I'm not joking or being sarcastic.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
I'm not sure I agree with much of the sentiment here.
First of all, it looks like the primary reason the Iranian president was invited to speak at the University was so that he could be insulted.
The University president actually said he felt the weight of the western world on his shoulders, and that it was his duty to express the revulsion of the world. He spent his entire introduction insulting his invited guest speaker.
And I guess... I guess I'm the only one who thinks that's wrong.
I really don't care who it is, but when you invite someone to speak you have a duty to be civil and respectful. No one wants Hitler to knock on their door for tea and cakes, but if you invite the man over, then it becomes your duty to treat him with respect. It makes no difference who he is, because it is not about the man you've invited. It's about you. You do yourself a disservice to display such disregard to a guest.
The Iranian president's visit to the University was an exceptional learning opportunity. His ignorant or homophobic remarks on gay people were vastly illuminating. His softening stance on jews may signal political pressures at home. A platform designed to learn about him, rather than to persecute him, could have gleaned innumerable insights into the man. It could have provided fodder for countless psychology and political essays.
But quite frankly we learned more about Americans than we did about Iranians during his visit. And to me, that's sad.
--Anthony
"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Judith:
So, I suppose this is the reason to invade Iran. Save the Iranian gays from their leader. There is another alternative though, we could have the Iranian gays apply for status as political refugees.
BTW, I'm not joking or being sarcastic.
Who said anything bout invading Iran?
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Anthony T wrote: But quite frankly we learned more about Americans than we did about Iranians during his visit. And to me, that's sad.
We learned more about American University Presidents, namely, from Columbia, than we did about Iranians. But we didn't learn more about AMERICANS. Not by a long shot.
I sorta cringe when I hear the position that no matter who you invite to speak, you can't criticize that person. While I think that's fine, as a general rule, I have to wonder if the same attitude would hold true should say, Bush accept an invitation to speak before the NAACP. The reason he's declined, of course, is the vile and hateful things which top members of that organization have gone on record and said about the President. It's no wonder he's declined an invite. I doubt very strongly that many there would be able to hold their tongues, from the things they've called him. Now, this isn't a direct, one to one comparison of the various parties, to be interchanged on the whim of one's political view, but an attempt to show the overall issue of inviting one to speak before you with who you may have strong disagreements.
But back to the main point. Ahmadinejad says there are no gays, there is no 'homosexuals' lifestyel in Iran. Then we see 2 teenage boys, being hung to death, for the crime of being gay.
What are we, as a evolved species, suppose to say about that ? Some will ignore it , dismiss it out of hand, and try to bring up some other irrelevent point. Some will scold Columbia's President, for being a bad host, as if that crime is so much worse than putting to death these 2 teenage boys. By the way some folk are responding, Bollinger is being made the villain here, while the blood is all over the hands of Ahmadinejad.
Strange days we live in. Very strange indeed.
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I think you miss the point, Auraptor.
First of all, if someone invited President Bush to speak, and they behaved this way, I'd have the same complaints. It's one thing to ask hard-hitting questions that reveal a guest's inequities. It's quite another to outright insult him, especially during an introduction!
Where you really miss the point is in this paragraph here:
"What are we, as a evolved species, suppose to say about that ? Some will ignore it , dismiss it out of hand, and try to bring up some other irrelevent point. Some will scold Columbia's President, for being a bad host, as if that crime is so much worse than putting to death these 2 teenage boys. By the way some folk are responding, Bollinger is being made the villain here, while the blood is all over the hands of Ahmadinejad."
Perhaps what you fail to remember, is that the moment the Iranian President said there were no homosexuals in Iran, he was greeted with laughter. Perhaps what you fail to realize, is that no one said to themselves, "There's no gays in Iran? Wow. I wonder what's different about Iran? Is it something in the water?" Everyone understood that he was quite incorrect.
Probably the best thing the Iranian President said during the entire interview was that there were no homosexuals in Iran. It put valuable context onto all of his other statements.
There is no doubt that the Iranian President's hands are covered in blood. That was known and understood at the time of invitation. I don't expect much from the President of Iran. I expect a great deal from our intellectual leaders. Leaders who create an example for the world, and demonstrate our values to the international community.
And the message was this: "Think twice before you accept a dinner invitation at that house."
--Anthony
"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There are eye-witness survivors who say that this guy was one of the kidnappers during the 440+day Teheran Embassy seige in 1979. Why can't the UN arrest him today?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME