Real World Event Discussions

Iraqi WMD's non-existence still confounding some buggers!

POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Friday, September 14, 2007 17:16
VIEWED: 19028
PAGE 5 of 27

Friday, September 7, 2007 3:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
and there’s no guarantee that we still won’t find those WMD’s somewhere.

...and there's no guarantee that the Romulans won't invade us next year...
Quote:

In 2003, the existence of WMDs in Iraq was conjecture either way – there was really no hard evidence to support either side –
Exactly! PRECISELY!!
And somehow you are okay with starting a war based on what you want to see in a situation....honestly Finn, a lot of times you have an argument for your perspective that I must respect, but your logic is in question, where WMD's are concerned.

Vulcanisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

RUE
Friday, September 7, 2007 3:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
Hindsight is 20/20?

Hindsight in 2003 ? Try again.

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 7, 2007 3:40 PM

Quote:

So tell me, Finn. How is it that some people knew there were no WMD in Iraq while you continued (and still continue) to believe Bush ?-Rue

You don’t know any more than anyone else. -Finn

Quote:

Hindsight is 20/20?-BDN
Hey, I knew from the get-go and I posted as such. And I explained WHY I knew: The closer Blix got to declaring Iraq in substantial compliance with UN mandates, the more shrill the Adminstration got. Some of the "evidence" that they put forth was clearly unjustified. (For example, the DOE found those infamous aluminum tubes didn't meet uranium centrifuge specs and were prolly purchased for rocket engines. But one thing Bush does quite well is brush aside "techie" evaulations. It's like physical reality doesn't exist for him.) Furthermore, there is plenty of evidence from past administrations (You can include Lyndon Johnson and Maggie Thatcher along with Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush) that wars are NOT always about defense. Politics requires a BIG dose of skepticism: Nobody is going to tell you outright that they're about the f*ck yu over. BY the time they're thru spinning the story, you'll be so dizzy you'll believe it's all for your own good! Just start out with the idea that most politicians lie most of the time... EVEN ABOUT WAR... and you'll be heading in the right direction

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 7, 2007 3:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
I did know there were no WMD and I posted that.

So, how did I and others know while you didn't ?


You have the same psi-ability that I possess, clearly.

Gifted Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 7, 2007 3:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
I did know there were no WMD and I posted that.

So, how did I and others know while you didn't ?


You were wrong. President Clinton, ALGore and dozens of other high ranking democrats disagreed with you.

Not to mention President Bush, Tony Blair and 95% of the world wide intellegence community.

It was you, Saddam, and a few guys from the UN. Heck, I still don't believe you. Lets face it I could plop a warhead filled with sarin gas and stamped 'Made in Iraq, March 1st 2003' taken live on video by a busload of nuns as it was removed from Saddam's bedroom minutes after he fled the building having completed a live internet sex tape staring him, Paris Hilton, and the warhead and witnessed by every person in the entire world and certified by Jesus Christ himself IN PERSON and you'd still say "but there were no WMDs, Bush lied".

Did they find a WMD program? No. Did they find WMDs and prohibited weapons? Yes, yes they did. Most were manufactured leftovers from the '80s and early '90s and no stockpiles, just some here and some there. Might Saddam have hidden more or moved them to Syria? Maybe. He sent his air force to Iran during the '91 War (except the Migs we found buried in the desert in 1993) , so there's precedent.

Tell you what. Give me ten years head start and I'll hide something in the state of California, if you find it then I'll admit I'm wrong.

H

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 7, 2007 3:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
BY the time they're thru spinning the story, you'll be so dizzy

that you might even destroy you country's economy trying to respond.

Saddam was goin' for a Reagan-a-dope Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 7, 2007 3:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
Lets face it I could plop a warhead filled with sarin gas and stamped 'Made in Iraq, March 1st 2003' taken live on video by a busload of nuns as it was removed from Saddam's bedroom minutes after he fled the building having completed a live internet sex tape staring him, Paris Hilton, and the warhead and witnessed by every person in the entire world and certified by Jesus Christ himself IN PERSON and you'd still say "but there were no WMDs, Bush lied".


The EXACT opposite is true for you, Hero.

And you won't even see it Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 7, 2007 3:49 PM

Quote:

You were wrong. President Clinton, ALGore and dozens of other high ranking democrats disagreed with you.
At the time they were in office they did not have the additional information generated by aggressive UNMOVIC inpsections. And it wasn't "the UN" that inpsected Iraq, the inspection team included Scott Ritter AND David Kay. I listened carefully to what they were doing and how they were doing it, and it didn't seem possible that Saddam would be producing WMD in meaningful quantities w/o it being detected. You have to pay attention to information as it comes in, not get stuck in 5-year-old data.
Quote:

Lets face it I could plop a warhead filled with sarin gas and stamped 'Made in Iraq, March 1st 2003' taken live on video by a busload of nuns as it was removed from Saddam's bedroom minutes after he fled the building having completed a live internet sex tape staring him, Paris Hilton, and the warhead and witnessed by every person in the entire world and certified by Jesus Christ himself IN PERSON and you'd still say "but there were no WMDs, Bush lied".
Is that the best you can come up with???? Why did you even post?
Quote:

Tell you what. Give me ten years head start and I'll hide something in the state of California, if you find it then I'll admit I'm wrong.
Is it bigger than a breadbox? Tell you what- you "hide" a uranium weapons program in California, or the ability to produce 5 tons of Sarin... or the ability to produce 25,000 liters of liquid anthrax and you win.





---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

RUE
Friday, September 7, 2007 3:54 PM

"You were wrong. President Clinton, ALGore and dozens of other high ranking democrats disagreed with you."

No, I was right.

Now maybe in your line of work (court clerk) you spend your time thinking about how things could have been construed and how to work with innuendo, but in my line of work (scientist) I deal with data and facts.

So, what did I know that made me right and you wrong ?

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, September 7, 2007 4:41 PM

Oh yeah... and make sure you hide that ICBM program you got going too. Also make sure to test your rockets and missiles in secret.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME