Planet X and Global Warming could there be a connection ?

POSTED BY: piratejenny
UPDATED: Monday, November 9, 2009 18:38
VIEWED: 20749
PAGE 6 of 9

http://www.apollon.uio.no/vis/art/2006_4/Artikler/python_english
archaeological find in Botswana shows that our ancestors in Africa engaged in ritual practice 70,000 years ago

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

The difference between you and I, is that I only attack people who attack me first.

---

Citizen
No I said you were intelligent. Saying someone is intelligent is a compliment.

The difference between you and I is that you often don't believe you are intelligent and I always believe I am intelligent. If anyone is silly you automatically think they are being silly in order to show you that you are unintelligent. You don't like people saying things more intelligent than you because you have to question your intelligence. I don't care if anyone is silly or smarter than me. You think your intelligence is the only quality you have. I don't think intelligence is the only quality I have. Intelligence is not the only quality you have. One quality I have noticed you have is wit. You could find other qualities if you looked.


piratejenny
What were some of the predictions from Stichen about the world? (For those people like me that don't know much about Stichen's work)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

For anyone who's interested, I've read several articles about the discovery. It seems the ancient people worshipped a stone python. That was so long ago (70,000 years) that it's hard to believe an oral tradition survived, but I do wonder if that was part of the snake in the garden of Eden myth. (The garden being the pre-language stage of humanity.)

BTW the first evidence I know of for modern humans are fossilized footprints dating 100,000 years ago. So there is very recent evidence of modern humans followed shortly by evidence of myth and religion.

But none of this fits in with the Sumerian timetable which goes back a mere 7,000 years.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

PJ love your stuff. Even if its a fairy tale just great entertainment. I believe in Art Bell and God. Lets see I know Chaco canyon in northwest New Mexico has little space midgets drawn on it 1k years or so ago by injuns. Nirbiru hmmmm could be not sure but makes sense. This is why I stock up on root beer and chili dog sauce. I just think global Warming is from farting or just natural time occurances. Citizen had it sexual organs removed and thats why it has so much venom on its posts. Say anything you want. I like this type of topic. I always figured space midgets took apes and pigs and made the Irish race. Who really knows. Sitchin I enjoy but he is about selling his books. He always has been about making a buck. Scientologist have a take with the book Battlefield Earth. Keep up the interesting posts. Nobody really knows our past.

"Battle of Serenity, Mal. Besides Zoe here, how many-" "I'm talkin at you! How many men in your platoon came out of their alive".

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

This has been really entertaining...

There is a "planet" beyond pluto. The unofficial name was "Xena" it had one moon, unofficial name of "Gabrielle"... caused all manner of bru-ha-ha in astronomical circles.

They decided to create a new category of Dwarf Planets (not really planets, but still quite big and imperfectly orbiting the sun) Pluto was bumped into this category with the re-named planet (cant remember what they called it, should of stuck with Xena IMO).

Description sounds like a comet *not* a planet and the sources are disreputable. Funny debate though...

---------
I will think of a signature later. It will be so stunningly brilliant your entire life will pale into insignificance when compared to the few words that will be written here.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

@Trueblue

Xena does not conform in any way to the description given for Nibiru

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by piratejenny:
and don't have a religion, I think your the one thats religious, maybe thats why your so quick to dismiss what Stitchen is saying although if you haven't read any of his books, I honestly don't see where you can have formed such an opinion.

---

I'm the one who wants hard scientific evidence for something, and you are the one that takes Stitchen's word backed up by Stitchen's word that he has evidence, and I'm the one who's taking the religious view? You reject science for Stitchen pop-psuedo-science, just because you also reject 'mainstream' religions doesn't mean that yours is any less of a faith based stance.

Why are you so quick to reject mainstream science for Stitchen's say so? Sounds like the young Earth Creationist rejecting the 4 billion year old rocks, because the Bible scholar says the Earth was only created 6000 years ago.

Oh, and coincidently, I've read enough of Stitchen's work to know he bases his assumptions on leaps of faith worthy of works like the Bible.

Quote:

---

Its not as if Stitchen is just throwing stuff out there and saying believe what I say, there is evidence that supports what he and the sumerians have said, thetr are scientist that also agree, have you even read any of stitchen's books!! last time we we discussed this you had not

---

Have I read one of his books all the way through? No, I don't wish to authorise such drivel, nor do I wish too waste my money. I have read much of his work, indeed easily enough to make the assertions I do. Have you read anything from a credible source? Have you read anything that disagrees with Stitchen at all, let alone with the level of 'open mindedness' (i.e. blind faith) that you expect me to show Stitchen?

I rather expect not. Even IF we are to accept Stitchen's translation as correct, and we accept that his interpretation is also correct, (which I, and it would seem just about everyone who can read Cuneiform do not) then there's the basic fact that as far as these concepts have been outlined to me they are physically impossible. Even if he is 100% correct with his interpretations, that doesn't not therefore mean the Summerians were, or that this was anything more than a children's bed time story, or religious dogma.

Think about it, two thousand years from now some Martian Archaeologist comes to Earth to study 19th/20th Century Western Earth culture, and digs up a copy of 'Alice in Wonderland'. She returns to Mars, and proclaims it as proof that a little girl living in Victorian England travelled to the Fourth Dimension, and met a mad hatter. Sheds a new light on your rigid observance that Stitchen has a credible claim to the existence of Planet X, even in lieu of any real evidence of it's existence, at least to me.

Who are these scientist that agree with Stitchen? Mrs Stitchen perhaps? Professor Tiddles, AKA Stitchens Tabby? Anything to back up this assertion, at all?

Quote:

---

I don't believe you've even read his books, no I'm not ignorning others interpretation, its just that Stichen is the one that makes the most sense.

---

I don't believe you've read anything besides Stitchen on this matter, not even basic astrophysics, let alone alternate interpretations. Of course Stitchen's interpretation makes the most sense if you're only exposure to other interpretations was on a Stitchen friendly website that tells you it's 'all lies', and/or cherry picks the weakest examples.

Here's another interpretation even accepting what Stitchen has to say is 100% correct: It's just a religious fable. How on Earth (or Planet X-Y or Z for that matter) does "there's a planet with an advanced race of super beings floating around space, that our telescopes just happen to be unable to see" make more sense than that?

Quote:

---

Just like you cannot ignore the facts ,the same stories in the Bible are predated by more detailed stories of the same events in sumerian text. yet just because the Annunakki are there many other sholars want to say that they are myths...its a contridiction.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME