Planet X and Global Warming could there be a connection ?
POSTED BY: piratejenny
UPDATED: Monday, November 9, 2009 18:38
VIEWED: 20749
PAGE 5 of 9
So lets see some of this detailed information then.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
I don't believe you've even read his books, no I'm not ignorning others interpretation, its just that Stichen is the one that makes the most sense.
To you.
Quote:
Just like you cannot ignore the facts ,the same stories in the Bible are predated by more detailed stories of the same events in sumerian text. yet just because the Annunakki are there many other sholars want to say that they are myths...its a contridiction.
Not really, we are a country of Christians so calling the Bible a myth raises hackles, calling the Sumerian beliefs myth only pisses off people like you. Many of those scholars would probably be willing to privately call the Bible a myth they just don't want to deal with the backlash of calling it a myth in public.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
Stitchen can't be dismissed and he won't be
He can be and he has.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
Its all very fascinating, either way the thing I like about this is that it can be proven and will be proven or disproven either way bTime will soon tell
He has given a date for when this planet is going to show up right?
My money is on the following happening, the date comes and goes and he says something to the effect of "Oops, I transposed a variable, it won't be here for 20 more years" and you will believe him, and then 20 years later when it fails to appear again he will say "Oops, I replaced the wrong variable, it's going to be about 20 more years" and you will believe him again.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by fredgiblet:Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
Stitchen can't be dismissed and he won't be
He can be and he has.
Yes to me, most defintely to me
No stitchen will not be dismissed nor has he been, don't get it confused, I'm not proposing that anyone agree with me or stitchen I'm just putting it out there.
Well if the Time comes around and no planet arrives then where is the harm...But if it does then what? Stitchen didn't make up the time the planet would come around, the sumerians are the ones who said the planet has a 3,600 year orbit!! also Stichen is 84 years old I doubt if he'll be around in 20 years
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by fredgiblet:Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
I don't believe you've even read his books, no I'm not ignorning others interpretation, its just that Stichen is the one that makes the most sense.
To you.Quote:
Just like you cannot ignore the facts ,the same stories in the Bible are predated by more detailed stories of the same events in sumerian text. yet just because the Annunakki are there many other sholars want to say that they are myths...its a contridiction.
Not really, we are a country of Christians so calling the Bible a myth raises hackles, calling the Sumerian beliefs myth only pisses off people like you. Many of those scholars would probably be willing to privately call the Bible a myth they just don't want to deal with the backlash of calling it a myth in public.
Most scientist are evolutionst, so most don't have to take a stance on that , Science and religion are usually opposing eachother,
however the truth more than likely lies somewhere between the two extremes, the sumerians certainly do say so, we were both evolved and where created, so its no surprise that many would call the sumerian tales myths
However we cannot ingnore that there is a missing link that hasn't been found , and it won't be because the missing link is the annunakki , look you can ignore alot of the facts if you like its your choice, all I'm saying is before completely dismissing it look at everything
Why would you think I'd be pissed off, I'm not nor have I ever been, you obviously don't understand.
The Bible stories are predated by the same sumerian stories, which explains where those stories came from, so if you are calling the sumerian stories a myth then you are calling the Biblical stories a myth. the Biblical stories are but a condesed, less informative less detailed, edited version of the sumerian stories.
Also Abraham the founding father of judeaism was from Ur. which explains where they got their stories!!
I'm not religious so there is no need for me to be pissed off!!!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
Why would you think I'd be pissed off, I'm not nor have I ever been
Because they are calling the things you believe in myths. People usually get pissed when their beliefs are called myths.
Quote:
you obviously don't understand.
I don't understand the way your mind works, but I do have a decent grasp on the way most peoples minds work.
Quote:
The Bible stories are predated by the same sumerian stories, which explains where those stories came from, so if you are calling the sumerian stories a myth then you are calling the Biblical stories a myth. the Biblical stories are but a condesed, less informative less detailed, edited version of the sumerian stories.
Right, but most people have the amazing capacity to experience cognitive dissonance without a flinch, plus most people aren't aware that the Bible is based off of earlier works and many would deny it if you tried to tell them. As I said many people who actually study the history of the Bible would be willing to call the Bible mythical in private, but stating it publicly would cause a backlash.
Quote:
I'm not religious so there is no need for me to be pissed off!!!
Then what's with al the quotation marks?
EDIT: Geh, meant exclamation points.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The quotation marks are just a little quirk of mines, a habit really.
Yes most people don't understand the way my mind works because I'm not religious, and yet I do give the information handed down through antiquity credit in explining our orgins and how we came to have religion and how we came to be here.I don't take the stories as myths, I think part of the confusion is that most people who claim to be religious secretly do think of the stories as myths even though they would never say so;However, when they come across someone who isn't religious but actually gives the stories some crediblity..its hard for them to understand,
I look at them as being very real espeically when you go to the orginal source the sumerians, because those stories are not boggled down in symbology. Inorder to do that you have to go back to the 1rst known culture and civilzation on the planet. The Sumerians had knowlege and information even technology, all great civilzations that came after it have a direct tie and relation to Sumer, we cannot ignore what they said and what they told us.
And what they said was everything they have and learned was given to them by the annunakki.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
I don't take the stories as myths
Do you believe all of them? since so many of them contradict each other it would seem to be impossible.
Quote:
Inorder to do that you have to go back to the 1rst known culture and civilzation on the planet.
First known does not necessarily mean first though, something to keep in mind. Sumer is the first civilization that left enough traces for us to confirm it's existence, but that doesn't mean that there couldn't have been another civilization that simply didn't leave enough evidence (or we haven't looked in the right spot). In fact this hypothetical other civilization could be the aliens that the Sumerians supposedly came in contact with.
Quote:
all great civilzations that came after it have a direct tie and relation to Sumer
I'm pretty sure that the Aztecs, Incas, Mayans and maybe even the Chinese, Japanese and Mongols were already gone from the area before the rise of Sumer. As for the Middle East and the civilizations of Europe though you won't find me arguing against that.
Quote:
we cannot ignore what they said and what they told us.
Why should we give them more credence then any other ancient civilization?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sumer predates all other civilzations on the planet. and the Sumerians do say that the annunakki, were here 1rt and had already established cities before there were ever any Homo sapiens not other homnids but homo sapiens whom the sumerians distinguished the diffrence between themselves.So long before Sumerians had began to write down their history,The annunakki and later the sumerians themselves had already long been here As it stands all evidence supports that the sumerians were the 1rst, they themselves cobborate this. Scientific evidence supports this life and civilzation started in Africa southern and Civilzation in the eastern part around the Euphrates and Tigress river
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME