Planet X and Global Warming could there be a connection ?

POSTED BY: piratejenny
UPDATED: Monday, November 9, 2009 18:38
VIEWED: 20749
PAGE 4 of 9

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NEXT PAGE

PIRATEJENNY

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 6:50 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by fredgiblet:
Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
Planet X is supposedly heated by it's inner core!!

If it is still being heated by it's core then it must have been amazingly hot recently (recently in geological terms that is), this would have likely made it extremely difficult for life to evolve.

That may very well be true, but then again it maynot be. Some scientist say that a habitable planet can be heated by its inner core, it depends on alot of things, but again if the planet doesn't exist then it will be proven not to exist.

you should check out Xfacts.com and click on sumerian culture, it will answer alot of your questions.

PIRATEJENNY

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 6:56 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by oldenglanddry:
Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:

According to Mespotamian Text when Nibiru/ Planet X does come into the solar system it will be so bright that we will be able to see it shining even in the daytime espeically in the morning and towards evening.

Sounds like a Comet to me.
How about some links to your sources, I mean the Sumerian texts not Sitchin. You keep saying "according to Sumerian texts" well lets have some qoutes so that we can judge for ourselves. But if the texts you are reading are in Sitchin's books then you'r not reading Sumerian text, you'r reading Sitchin's interpretation of them, or his interpretation of someone elses translation which is even less accurate.

Sumerian Text according to Stitchen, there are only a handful of people if that in the whole world that can read and understand sumerian text, the only real diffrence between Sitchen and some other scholars is that he takes what the sumerians say as literal truth, many others just look at the text as myths...

I happen to think that Stitchen is on the right track not saying he is correct in every detail of his interpetation, but I think he's probably got about 90 percent of it correct.

if he's wrong, then time will soon tell. but if he's right...This is going to be something major.

MAZAEN

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:22 AM

piratejenny
citizen is like this with everyone.
Knowledge is pretty much reliant on facts. Sitchen hypothesises that there is a planet Nibiru. Hypthesises is a word that means an idea that hasn't been proven to be a fact. Because Nibiru is a hypothesis, wouldn't that mean it is not a fact? When a hypothesis becomes proven, then it becomes a fact.

Citizen
Bunny-land- glad you've discovered it and appreciate it's value. Tell us about it. I know, bunny's aren't for intelligent people like yourself because then you have to question you're intelligence or something like that.

PIRATEJENNY

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:45 AM

I know about Citizen he doesn't bother me, he wants hardcore facts, and thats fine by me, Actually thats not a bad thing at all,until the planet actually shows up, yeah its just a hypothesis as you say atleast for many. But really it isn't. The sumerians had the 1rst ever civilization, the rose up literally overnight and out of the blue, out of their civilization and culture they gave many of our 1rst, math,science,atronomy, religion, music, and they themselves have said everything they know was given to them by the annunakki!!

I see it as more than that because this is something that has happened before and information thats been passed down

I happen to think Stitchen has got it right!! After all he's just going by what the sumerians themselves have said. Its all very fascinating, either way the thing I like about this is that it can be proven and will be proven or disproven either way bTime will soon tell

But, if its true and I do think it is,
well the World as we know it is in for some major changes!!! exciting for some, scary for others and challenging for us all I imagine.

PIRATEJENNY

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:15 AM

Quote:
like a Comet to me.
How about some links to your sources, I mean the Sumerian texts not Sitchin. You keep saying "according to Sumerian texts" well lets have some qoutes so that we can judge for ourselves. But if the texts you are reading are in Sitchin's books then you'r not reading Sumerian text, you'r reading Sitchin's interpretation of them, or his interpretation of someone elses translation which is even less accurate.

Nope the sumerians were talking about a planet, that the annunakki came from.

OLDENGLANDDRY

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:27 PM

Your still relying too much on Stitchin's INTERPRETATIONS of texts that you imply he TRANSLATED HIMSELF. In other words, since you and I dont read Sumerian or Cuniform, Stitchin could be making it all up. We only have his word for it.
Once again I ask you to quote some sources other than Stitchin. Post some of these text translations and let us judge for ourselves, otherwise everything you say is just your personal opinion (and Stitchin's).

CITIZEN

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:59 PM

Yeah I don't take Stitchens word at face value, unlike you. A little digging soon goes to show that Stitchens interpretation has no credibility, he won't even dare publish it as a peer review, if you cared about the reality of the situation you'd do some checking beyond Stitchen's say so. If there's 200 people who can read Summerian cuniform then there's 199 other interpretation you dismiss and care nothing for, because, it would seem, they don't say what you want to hear.

It's not science, and it's insulting that you and Stitchen dress up this faith as anything but.

There's numerous ways we can dimiss Stitchens account, the fact that his interpretations are dubious, at best, is the least of them. The fact that his fable, for it is not even a hypothesis, is impossible under physics would be a major one.

EDITED: For tone.

CITIZEN

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 5:01 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mazaen:
Citizen
Bunny-land- glad you've discovered it and appreciate it's value. Tell us about it. I know, bunny's aren't for intelligent people like yourself because then you have to question you're intelligence or something like that.

The difference between you and I, is that I only attack people who attack me first.

Secondly, what the hell are you babbling about? Glad you've discovered bunny-land... bunnies aren't for intelligent people like you. You contradict yourself in two run-on sentences.

CITIZEN

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 5:02 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
I know about Citizen he doesn't bother me, he wants hardcore facts,

Science wants hardcore facts, religion wants faith. If this is your religion then thats a different matter entirely.

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

PIRATEJENNY

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:41 PM

Citizen I think I've told you before that I'm not religious...and don't have a religion, I think your the one thats religious, maybe thats why your so quick to dismiss what Stitchen is saying although if you haven't read any of his books, I honestly don't see where you can have formed such an opinion.

Its not as if Stitchen is just throwing stuff out there and saying believe what I say, there is evidence that supports what he and the sumerians have said, thetr are scientist that also agree, have you even read any of stitchen's books!! last time we we discussed this you had not

Quote:
.Yeah I don't take Stitchens word at face value, unlike you. A little digging soon goes to show that Stitchens interpretation has no credibility, he won't even dare publish it as a peer review, if you cared about the reality of the situation you'd do some checking beyond Stitchen's say so. If there's 200 people who can read Summerian cuniform then there's 199 other interpretation you dismiss and care nothing for, because, it would seem, they don't say what you want to hear.

I don't believe you've even read his books, no I'm not ignorning others interpretation, its just that Stichen is the one that makes the most sense. Just like you cannot ignore the facts ,the same stories in the Bible are predated by more detailed stories of the same events in sumerian text. yet just because the Annunakki are there many other sholars want to say that they are myths...its a contridiction.

Stitchen doesn't ignore whats right before him because its to dangerous or does not fit with his world view, he lays it out there.

Stitchen can't be dismissed and he won't be, their is lots of informtion detailed very detailed information that comes from the sumarians, if you want to ignore it you can do so , but I'm not going too.

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NEXT PAGE