Public Safety Must Trump Individual's Safety
POSTED BY: ShinyEd
UPDATED: Friday, August 30, 2024 19:23
VIEWED: 7633
PAGE 1 of 5
This maniac Cho should NEVER have been allowed to be walking around free. He should have been locked in a straight-jacket inside a padded cell back in 2005....instead they checked off a box on a form that said: "imminent threat and danger to himself and others" and let him just walk out the door.
What we are increasingly facing here is a battle...a battle for the definition of our country. I say...the safety of the public comes first, no exceptions. These elitist "professionals" and their WALLS OF PROTECTION must be defeated. Psychiatrists, doctors, lawyers, etc MUST be compelled to report A DANGER TO SOCIETY whenever they have reasonable and documented suspicion.
Where is it written that a mob lawyer can chat with his murdering Mafia thug in jail and have attorney-client privilidge? It's not in the US Constitution...it was made up. Where is it written that pyschiatrists and suicide hotlines can use privacy concerns as a reason to expose all of us to monsters like this Cho?...Nowhere, except in their own self-gratifying world of superiority.
This is ALL an outgrowth of Political Correctness run fucking amok....Everyone AFRAID to pass a judgement, afraid to report, afraid to question...all due to the fear of a fucking LAWSUIT....and of course all the bleeding heart liberals and their pedophillic-friendly judges who refuse to call sex crimes...crimes...but instead look at all these monsters as needing treatment. Does all this scare you a bit? I'm sure it does here at FFF. It's fucking time for personal accountability to the general good and safety of our citizens...if you can't get over all your apprehensions about loss of privacy, then don't ever fucking ask why when the next massacre occurs.
Logic dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Scuse me while I call bullshit on you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the_University_of_
California
mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. The original 1974 decision mandated warning the threatened individual, but a 1976 rehearing of the case by the California Supreme Court called for a "duty to protect" the intended victim. The professional may discharge the duty in several ways, including notifying police, warning the intended victim, and/or taking other reasonable steps to protect the threatened individual.
The shrink screwed the pooch on this one, they ARE compelled to do so, and he/she dropped the ball - take issue with that instead of whining.
And next time you shoot off your mouth, maybe load your brain first, cause it's the empty weapon that fires the loudest.
-Frem
It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This whole issue would of been avoided if our government would REQUIRE the carrying of firearms at all times by all individuals over the age of 18.
"And I think calling him that is an insult to the psychotic lowlife community."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Can't argue with that....statistics prove that carry-permit states have seen their gun deaths drop significantly, as opposed to strict gun control places like Washington DC, where it continues to skyrocket.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by ShinyEd:
Piss off maggot.
What a clever and mature response to someone pointing out you've got your facts wrong.
But hey, why should facts matter?
Moron.
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
pointing it out with HIS "facts" & by calling it bullshit right...you can join him.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well... when one states something which is not true, like you did, as if it were fact, when it is indeed not - it's generally called bullshit.
He backed up his info - which is more than you seem capable of. You ranted like a petulent child, then called names when someone pointed out that you were full of.... bullshit.
Try backing up what you say, with, you know... something factual, and maybe you'll be taken more seriously.
But I'll gladly join him, as I tend to side with those who know what the fuck they're talking about, and not those who are just ranting like an idiot about how everything is the fault of those evil liberals.
But thanks for proving my observation that you're a moron.
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by ShinyEd:
This maniac Cho should NEVER have been allowed to be walking around free. He should have been locked in a straight-jacket inside a padded cell back in 2005....instead they checked off a box on a form that said: "imminent threat and danger to himself and others" and let him just walk out the door.
What we are increasingly facing here is a battle...a battle for the definition of our country. I say...the safety of the public comes first, no exceptions. These elitist "professionals" and their WALLS OF PROTECTION must be defeated. Psychiatrists, doctors, lawyers, etc MUST be compelled to report A DANGER TO SOCIETY whenever they have reasonable and documented suspicion.
Where is it written that a mob lawyer can chat with his murdering Mafia thug in jail and have attorney-client privilidge? It's not in the US Constitution...it was made up. Where is it written that pyschiatrists and suicide hotlines can use privacy concerns as a reason to expose all of us to monsters like this Cho?...Nowhere, except in their own self-gratifying world of superiority.
This is ALL an outgrowth of Political Correctness run fucking amok....Everyone AFRAID to pass a judgement, afraid to report, afraid to question...all due to the fear of a fucking LAWSUIT....and of course all the bleeding heart liberals and their pedophillic-friendly judges who refuse to call sex crimes...crimes...but instead look at all these monsters as needing treatment. Does all this scare you a bit? I'm sure it does here at FFF. It's fucking time for personal accountability to the general good and safety of our citizens...if you can't get over all your apprehensions about loss of privacy, then don't ever fucking ask why when the next massacre occurs.
Logic dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
Subject is irrational, hostile and abusive to others. Has referred repeatedly to "them" and "they" who have allowed bad things to happen to society. Seems to believe there is some kind of conspiricy involving "bleeding heart liberals" and "pedophillic friendly judges." Becomes extremely agitated when this theory is questioned, resorting to swearing, abusive responses etc.
Recommend that subject be detained for futher observation and treatment. Please prepare the straightjacket and padded room.
Banners, avatars and other fun stuff at www.desktophippie.com
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
We could have him sectioned....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2204983.stm
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME