Real World Event Discussions

the cold hard scientific facts: 9/11 was an inside job

POSTED BY: antimason
UPDATED: Sunday, January 14, 2007 09:17
VIEWED: 15140
PAGE 9 of 13

Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BuffaloPhil:


You idiot. All they had to do was hit the building near the middle. Then, the steel would soften, causing bending. The bending would increase, until the upper floors were forced to fall down on their center of gravity (i.e. straight down, jackhole);



have you seen that happen personally?? no, thats what the government theorizes; i am no engineer, i doubt you are either.. but there are hundreds if not thousands of professionals in the field who have come out against the official story, so its not as cut and dry as you think. of course.. it eases your mind from actually being vigilante against government and protecting peoples rights the world over. out of sight out of mind! lets blame the muslims and be done with it.. ww3 here we come

Quote:

the top thirty to forty stories were falling down into the bottom sixty! Of course the damn building fell in less than twenty seconds! Dear God, why are you still propagating this crap?


if that helps you sleep better at night... in the meantime we'll just keep murdering Iraqis by the thousands and over turn ever last civil liberty until nothing happens without the government knowing about it. when you accept the '08 REAL ID act, and permantly have a RFID locator attached to your person.. you come back here and tell me that taking our liberties is for our own good. in 2010, when the NAFTA superhighway is completed and mexicans and canadians have free travel into the AMericas, you come back here and tell me that Bush cared about national security. youre the joke, you accept political events in a vacuum, as if they happen randomly- when some people, like Roosevelt for example, knew that NOTHING HAPPENS BY ACCIDENT IN POLITICS- that its all driven by a pre-existing agenda or motive. by the time you realize this, it will be too late for you to make a change

"I cannot abide useless people."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AnthonyT:
"I don't see where the Bush administration has to be in the middle of the plot to knowingly take advantage of it."

Amen, brother. The #1 Political response to any event: "How can we spin this to our advantage?"

--Anthony



you guys are sick.. do you think that makes you patriotic, because you defend the Bush family?? did you know they imbezzled money for HItler? or that they had business connections with the Bin Laden family? you simply do not understand the game! Bush didnt need to know anymore then to keep pushing the PNAC agenda

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by yinyang:

Quote:

antimason- the cold hard scientific facts: 9/11 was an inside job





you dont actually believe what the government tells you... do you? read Operation Northwoods documents from the 60's, where our own DoD PLANNED TO ATTACK AMERICANS AND STAGE IT AS A CUBAN TERROR EVENT to justify military action. they planned to murder INNOCENT AMERICANS! straight from the governments mouth.. but youll come on here and tell me im crazy, because I ACTUALLY LOOKED INTO IT! what a bunch of sheeple- Hitler would have loved people like you all

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
So you have testimony that Cheney was reluctant to shoot down a plane full of innocent people. And that’s your evidence that Cheney wanted to kill thousands of other innocent people? You really have to be a true believer to think that this is convincing evidence for your case.



this is why you werent in charge: shoot down the plane and lose the passengers, or LOSE THE PLANE ANYWAY and lose the targeted impact zone aswell! think about it... it hurts the official rediculous theory because Cheney is shown allowing the terror attack to occur! just as their political motives dictated





So you would just kill them without hesitation? Glad you'll never be in charge of anything important. It would scare me if it was an easy decison.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
thats silly. your saying a few floors of fires caused 80+ stories to implode! im saying prove it? show me the physics.. its impossible. the plane alone damaged a few floors, not the entire structure; it would have caused a fragmented collapse, not a perfect controlled demolition

“The structural analyses of this study on components, subsystem, isolated exterior walls and cores, and global models of the WTC1 and WTC2, as well as observations from photos and videos taken during events, showed that the tower collapses were caused by combined effects of the structural and thermal insulation damage from aircraft impact and the subsequent intense fires. [[]emphasis mine[]]”
-- Global Structural Analysis of the Response of the World Trade Center Towers to Impact Damage and fire, National Institute of Standards and Technology
http://wtc.nist.gov/oct05NCSTAR1-6index.htm



thats what the national institute for propoganda and disinformation claims.. that doesnt make it proven. you can plead to me all day that the impact from the jet, followed by some MINIMAL JET FIRES that burned at most 1000degrees, for 1 hr, to have caused 110 stories to collapse at freefall speeds... but it would never have fallen that way. see your ignoring what even the designers of the building said, which is that they designed it so that a plane crash would MERELY PUNCTURE THE BUILDING! it never would have collapsed controllable into its own footprint- the odds are slim to nil. i suggest you read what the actual engineers have to say... but then no one has talked to the designers since 9.11, since the lead engineer died IN THE TOWERS THAT DAY.. conveniently!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2-

It doesn't and that's where the theory falls apart. Huge conspiracies are hard to keep, the more people involved the greater the risk.



sure buddy.. the US government has no secrets?? wheres your proof.. and is the crux of your arguement?? get real




So what you are saying is that because it's imposible to prove a negative it must be true? Don't be an idiot.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:


So you would just kill them without hesitation? Glad you'll never be in charge of anything important. It would scare me if it was an easy decison.



if Cheney cant stand the heat.. why was he suddenly given control over the emergency bunker(months before) to begin with??

you all are so consumed by your emotional feelings of that day and your initital preconceptions that you are blinded by any peice of evidence that suggests that, suprisingly, those attacks didnt catch every westerner in the world by suprise! you think it was out of the blue, when the facts are so clear as to be painfull.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:21 AM

The building was designed to take a hit from a 707 fluing at low speed lost in fog not a 757 with an almost full fuel load traveling at over 400mph.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
The building was designed to take a hit from a 707 fluing at low speed lost in fog not a 757 with an almost full fuel load traveling at over 400mph.



full of fuel? apparently it was coasting when it almost landed at its intended destination, and turned completely around? i guess the people at FAA and NORAD were getting coffee too huh...

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:39 AM

if there was NNOOOO PRIOR KNOWLEDGE, like Condi Rice and the President, and the whole of mass media mouthpieces claimed at the time, then explain why the CIA director george Tenet, and associated members were exposed as having committed insider trading the morning of 9.11 selling AA and united stocks short. why were their rumors in NY, literally ask NYers this, that something bad would happen down town- and to skip work at the towers that day. their are persistant reports of this prior knowledge, its all factual, google it... and it all points to prior knowlendge, yet its information that has no place in your official story, where "no one could possibly have imagined a plane being flown into a building"... when the CIA was running an IDENTICAL DRILL THE MORNING OF.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME